Work offsite with your ex: how to handle it

Work offsite with your ex? Use science-backed strategies to stay calm, set boundaries and make smart choices. What to say, avoid and how to recover.

10 min read Attachment & Psychology

Why you should read this guide

A work offsite is often a social challenge even without a breakup. When your ex is there, triggers, memories and group dynamics can become a volatile mix. In this guide you will get science-backed strategies from attachment and emotion research, neuropsychology and relationship science. You will learn how to prepare, stay calm in hot moments, set boundaries, and shape the night so it benefits you long term, whether you need distance or want to carefully test if reconnection has a serious chance.

The context: Why a work offsite with an ex plays by different rules

A work offsite blends private emotion with a public stage. You are not a duo, you are in a social microcosm with managers, teammates, shared tasks, alcohol, group photos and possibly an overnight stay. This mix increases: (1) the likelihood of triggers, (2) the risk of impulsive actions, (3) the importance of impression management. There are also opportunities: you can show emotional stability, communicate as equals and demonstrate social skill, all factors that signal safety and lift attractiveness according to attachment research.

Important: a work offsite is not a stage for therapy or reconciliation. It is first and foremost a work event with a clear priority: professionalism and teamwork. That frame protects you and also requires strategy so you do not fall into old patterns.

The science: What a "work offsite with your ex" does inside you

Several strands of research explain why ex-encounters feel so intense:

  • Attachment system: Following Bowlby and Ainsworth, separation triggers a "bonding alarm". Depending on your attachment style (secure, anxious, avoidant) you may cling, ruminate or withdraw. At work, social evaluation can amplify these patterns (Hazan & Shaver; Mikulincer & Shaver).
  • Neurochemistry: Romantic rejection activates reward and stress networks similar to addiction and pain systems (Fisher et al.; Kross et al.; MacDonald & Leary). A brief look, a scent or a voice can trigger dopaminergic expectation and separation pain at once. That is why a neutral "Hi" can feel like a heavy relapse inside.
  • Social threat: Humans are highly sensitive to rejection. In group settings like a work offsite, perceived exclusion can feel especially painful (Kross; Williams). Do not underestimate how strongly a short comment or nonverbal cue can land.
  • Negativity bias: Negatives weigh more than positives (Baumeister et al.). A single slip, for example tears in front of others, can distort your self-image and sometimes the team's impression of you. Preparation helps.

What does that mean in practice? Your biggest resource is emotion regulation. Strategies like reappraisal, attentional control, breathing techniques and planned scripts have robust effects (Gross). Studies on breakup recovery show that controlled exposure, in small planned doses, can support healing if you behave safely while doing it (Sbarra). A work offsite is a form of "natural exposure": use it deliberately, not reactively.

The neurochemistry of love has addiction-like qualities, a look, a message or a memory can fire up the reward system again.

Dr. Helen Fisher , Anthropologist, Kinsey Institute

A core choice: Prioritise distance or test gentle reconnection?

Before you plan, pick a guiding line:

  • Prioritise distance: You want to heal, reduce rumination and stay professional. The goal is low-emotion, well-bounded behaviour with no room for interpretation.
  • Test reconnection: You want, carefully and without pressure, to show that conditions have improved (for example communication, stability) and see if your ex responds with minimal positivity. The goal is not "win them back instantly", it is safe signals.

Both goals require the same basics: stability, respect, boundaries. They differ in the dose and direction of contact.

If distance is your goal

  • Minimal, polite interaction
  • Clear time and social boundaries
  • Focus on the team, not your ex
  • No private topics, no excess alcohol
  • Debrief with self-care afterwards

If reconnection is your goal

  • Short, warm but non-committal signals
  • No relationship talk, only light, safe topics
  • Show consistency across the night
  • Respect any "no" and any withdrawal
  • Aftercare: do not chase, leave space

Preparation: Your pre-event plan

Good preparation reduces impulsive mistakes and makes regulation easier.

  • State your goal in one sentence: "I will stay professional and leave at 10:30 pm." Or: "I will show calm, make three useful team contributions and avoid deep chats."
  • Implementation intentions (If–Then plans): If I see my ex, then I say: "Hey, nice to see you. Have a good one tonight!" and walk to person X. If my heart races, then I will exhale longer for six breaths than I inhale.
  • Social anchors: Arrange to stick near one or two colleagues who have nothing to do with the breakup. They are your safe harbour in the group flow.
  • Exit strategy: Prepare a plausible reason to leave early (early train, morning appointment). Ending early is always better than unravelling late.
  • Define boundaries: No alcohol or max one drink. No debrief about the breakup with colleagues. No private messages to your ex before, during or after the event.
  • Physical priming routine: 5 minutes of brisk walking before the event, then 2 minutes of slow exhalation (4 seconds in, 6–8 seconds out). Movement and breath calm stress systems.
  • Clothing: Choose a look that feels authentic, competent and easy to move in. The goal is not to spark jealousy, it is to signal safety and self-respect.

Bonus: A WOOP plan for the night

  • Wish: "Stay composed and leave without drama."
  • Outcome: "I feel proud and professional, the team sees me as steady."
  • Obstacle (inner): "Jealousy triggers, rumination, urge to talk."
  • Plan (If–Then): "If I feel jealousy, then I will get two minutes of fresh air and complete a micro task afterwards." This mental contrasting plus implementation intentions strengthens commitment (Oettingen; Gollwitzer).

Scripts and lines: What you can actually say

If you plan your behaviour in advance, you can access it in the moment.

  • Neutral greeting: "Hi! Nice to see you. How are you? Enjoy tonight!" Smile, brief eye contact, keep moving.
  • Team small talk: "The view is great. Who is taking the first leg in the kayak?" Shift to the activity and the group.
  • Stop overly personal questions: "Happy to talk privately another time. Tonight I will stick to work topics." Friendly and firm.
  • Boundaries with alcohol: "Just water for me tonight, I have an early start."
  • Handling digs: "Let’s keep it respectful. I don’t want to get into that here."
  • Praise and warmth (reconnection, in dose): "Thanks for organising, this is really well planned." No private connotation.

Remember: short sentences, clear I-statements, no long justifications. That limits the room for interpretation.

The BIFF formula for tricky messages or questions

If a written or spontaneous tense question pops up, answer BIFF:

  • Brief: "Thanks for the info."
  • Informative: "For tonight I will stick to work topics."
  • Friendly: "Hope you have a good evening."
  • Firm: "Let’s keep anything private for another time and when we are sober." This structure reduces escalation and protects your boundary (Eddy).

Emotion regulation in real time: The four most effective tools

From emotion science (Gross) and breakup studies (Sbarra, Field) we can pull four tools for the work offsite with an ex:

Attentional control
  • Focus on tasks, objects, nature, sounds. Count steps to the firepit, set up the bowling lane, hold eye contact with teammates instead of your ex.
  • Micro-tasking: "I’ll take these three glasses to the table", "I’ll ask two colleagues about their project". Action reduces rumination.
Reappraisal
  • Instead of "He is ignoring me, I don’t matter": "We are both keeping it professional. That is respect."
  • Instead of "She is laughing with others": "She is relaxing with the team. Good that the environment stays friendly."
Breath and body regulation
  • 6–8 slow breaths with a longer exhale. Drop your shoulders, unclench your jaw, feel your feet.
  • Kinetic self-soothing: Sip water slowly, rinse your hands with cool water, step outside for 30 seconds of fresh air.
Social regulation
  • Brief check-in with a trusted colleague: "I’m taking a quick breather, back in a minute." No breakup details.

These are not cosmetic. They measurably shift stress and reward activity and the felt pain of social rejection (Kross; MacDonald & Leary). A meta-analysis shows that adaptive strategies like reappraisal and problem-solving are linked with better wellbeing over time (Aldao et al.).

Alcohol caution: Alcohol lowers inhibition and amplifies impulsive attachment reactions. If your inner voice says "Just one more", that is often the cue to leave.

Fine-tuning by attachment style

Different patterns need different micro-strategies:

  • Anxious-ambivalent
    • Do: Set clear plans and times in advance, use your social anchor, practise self-soothing (breath, self-compassion).
    • Don’t: Seek subtle reassurance (glances, tests, hints). No "We need to talk" attempts.
    • Line: "I can want closeness and still keep distance tonight, for my protection."
  • Avoidant
    • Do: Show measured, polite presence instead of total withdrawal. Aim for 1–2 short positive interactions in the team.
    • Don’t: Cool devaluation or ignoring that others may read as hostility.
    • Line: "I can hold boundaries without putting others down."
  • Disorganised/mixed
    • Do: Small predictable steps, clear exit times, zero alcohol.
    • Don’t: Sudden switches (seek closeness then push away).
    • Line: "Small consistent actions are safer than intense moments."

This micro-adjustment boosts your sense of inner leadership, and that shows as stability on the outside.

Group dynamics: How to move through the team with poise

  • Positioning: Stand so you are not stuck facing your ex. Move naturally, you control sightlines.
  • Activities: Take small visible tasks without dominating (coordinate photos, sort place cards). It signals competence and distracts you.
  • Humour: Use light, inclusive humour. Avoid insider jokes from your past together, they can trigger you or confuse others.
  • Avoid coalitions: Do not ask friends to take sides. That ramps up group pressure and looks unprofessional.
  • No breakup debriefs: Talking about the breakup at work almost always harms your long-term position and privacy, and undermines trust, including with your ex.

Remote or hybrid offsites (digital events)

  • Camera management: Do not pin your ex’s video, use gallery view.
  • Chat hygiene: No private DMs during the event. Skip reaction emojis on your ex.
  • Breaks: Plan mini-pauses between breakout sessions for breathing and reappraisal.
  • Background: Calm, professional setting, no memory triggers in frame.
  • Leaving early is still possible, let the host know briefly.

The awkward moment: When you end up side by side

These little islands happen often at offsites, at the buffet, on the way to an activity, at the firepit.

  • Keep it short, roughly 30–90 seconds.
  • Pick neutral topics: "How did your sprint review go?" "That team challenge was funny."
  • Watch signals: If your ex is brief, respect it immediately. If they are warm, do not extend automatically, stick to your planned dose.
  • End it actively: "I’m grabbing some water. Catch you later!" You lead the situation.

If you are testing reconnection, dosing is the art. Safe bonding signals are warmth, consistency, respect for boundaries and self-regulation, not drama, jealousy or pressure (Gottman; Johnson).

Trigger management: Smells, music, photos, insider spots

Breakup and attachment research shows that senses tie strongly to memory.

  • Scent: If perfume/aftershave triggers you, carry your own calming scent (for example a drop of essential oil on a tissue) and use it discreetly.
  • Music: Ask the organisers beforehand for a playlist without your songs if possible. Or use quick music shifts in breaks (earbuds for a minute outside).
  • Photos: If group photos happen, aim for neutral. Do not stand right next to your ex, but do not obviously step away either. Later: avoid story-spinning.
  • Insider spots: If the venue brings up memories, breathe, label it internally as "memory", and shift your gaze to new details (colours, sounds). That is live reappraisal.

If your ex mentions new dates or flirts

Jealousy is normal but risky. Research shows social rejection hurts and easily leads to hostile interpretations (Williams; MacDonald & Leary).

  • Immediate steps: Break eye contact, lengthen your exhale, focus on a task. No sarcastic jabs, no comparisons.
  • Inner line: "This hurts, and I will stay true to myself." Accept the feeling, avoid reactive action.
  • Behaviour: Stay neutral, keep distance. If needed, leave the situation for a few minutes.

Testing reconnection? Flirting with others is not a green light. People who want a real restart signal respect. Your best response is maturity, paradoxically the most attractive move.

HR and safety: When to protect your boundaries

  • Confidentiality: Do not discuss relationship details. This protects you and your professional image.
  • Overstepping: Be clear, "I don’t want to discuss that here." If boundaries are ignored, involve a neutral person calmly or inform HR later.
  • Alcohol and consent: No private advances under the influence. Professionalism first. That protects everyone.
  • Overnights: If the event includes an overnight stay, sort rooms, seating and shuttles in advance. Clarity prevents misunderstandings.

If you are a manager, double responsibility

  • Role-modelling: Model boundaries (no hushed confiding, no alcohol excess).
  • Equal treatment: No visible special favours or coldness towards your ex.
  • No performance chats: Do not give feedback or career talks that night.
  • Conflict prevention: Plan seating, team mix and tasks to reduce tension.
  • Documentation: If incidents occur, document promptly and factually and pass to HR without judgements.

Mini opportunities for trust signals without pressure

If you are testing reconnection, focus on five safe micro behaviours:

  • Steady calm across the evening (no mood swings)
  • Prosocial acts with no strings attached (offer a seat, help out)
  • Respectful distance: you do not chase closeness, you do not refuse it either
  • No sensitive topics, no rehashing the past
  • Clean ending: friendly goodbye with no "We need to talk" hook

Gottman’s work suggests stable positive micro-interactions build trust. The offsite can be a stage for that, but only if you control the dose.

5:1

Positives/negatives, a rule of thumb for stable impressions (Gottman). Aim for more positive than tricky micro-moments.

10 breaths

That many intentional breaths often help you round the corner before you speak.

30 days

Plan a low-contact phase after the event to consolidate, especially if it was emotional.

Timeline: Before, during and after

Preparation

48–72 hours before

  • Define your goal, write scripts, choose clothing
  • Brief your social anchor, set your exit plan
  • Steady sleep and nutrition, skip alcohol
Arrival

First 15 minutes

  • Greet with a smile, neutral small talk
  • Scan the room: seat, exits, anchor person
  • Take on 1–2 micro tasks
Middle

During activities

  • Focus on team wins, steer eye contact
  • Breath breaks, short walks, drink water
  • Do not open private or historical topics
Late evening

When fatigue/alcohol kick in

  • Clear boundary: no sensitive talks, no relationship chat
  • If tension rises, leave early with a friendly goodbye
Aftercare

24–72 hours after

  • Journal: what worked, what triggered you?
  • Do not "check in" with your ex, prioritise self-care
  • Consider a therapy or coaching session

Concrete scenarios and solutions

  • Sophie, 34, Marketing: Fresh breakup (3 weeks). At the BBQ her ex raves about the steak they used to cook together. Solution: Sophie smiles, says "Good taste wins out" and pivots to "Who wants more salad?" Later she takes a 5-minute walk. Result: no escalation, inner pride.
  • Jack, 41, IT: He wants distance, but his ex seeks closeness and asks, "Why don’t you text me anymore?" Solution: Jack replies calmly, "I want to respect both of us and keep tonight to work topics." Then he asks colleague A about the next game.
  • Aisha, 29, HR: She wants to test reconnection long term. At bowling her ex sits next to her. Solution: Aisha brings a neutral positive topic ("Your team pulled off the cloud migration well, congrats"), stays two minutes, then changes seats. Later a friendly goodbye, no follow-up.
  • Tom, 38, Sales: His ex flirts openly. Tom feels jealousy rising. Solution: Tom leaves the room briefly, drinks water, repeats internally "Accept, breathe, act". He volunteers to host the next round, action focus over reactivity.
  • Mia, 33, Product: The group demands a "fun ex-couple photo". Solution: Mia smiles, says "Team only tonight" and suggests an alternative group shot. Humour plus boundary.
  • Daniel, 46, Operations: His ex starts talking about the breakup in a small circle. Solution: Daniel says calmly, "I don’t want to discuss that here. Thanks for understanding." He moves to colleagues discussing the new ERP.
  • Layla, 27, Customer Success: Overnight event. Her room is next to her ex. Solution: She asks the organisers early for a change ("I sleep better at the end of the corridor."). Prevention over escalation.
  • Emily, 32, Design: Toward the end a message from her ex: "Want to talk quickly?" Solution: Emily checks her goal card. She replies: "Not tonight, thanks. Let’s keep the evening professional." She leaves on time.

Inner work: Self-talk that works

  • "I’m allowed to be hurt, and I will act professionally."
  • "Their behaviour says nothing about my worth, only their current state."
  • "My aim is calm, not victory."
  • "Attractive is someone who can lead themselves."

These lines are more than mantras. They operationalise reappraisal and self-regulation, both core mechanisms of effective emotion control (Gross; Nolen-Hoeksema et al.).

Micro exercise in self-compassion (60–90 seconds)

  • Name it: "This is a moment of pain/jealousy."
  • Common humanity: "Many people feel this after a breakup, I’m not alone."
  • Kindness: Place a hand on chest or neck and say quietly, "I’m here for me. One step at a time." Short, evidence-aligned, it calms stress and shame (Neff).

What to avoid at all costs

  • Advances or intimate talks under alcohol
  • Passive aggression, digs, insider jokes from your relationship
  • "We need to sort this now", never at a work offsite
  • Coalitions with colleagues against your ex
  • Social media stories with barbs or hidden messages

No-go: jealousy as a tactic. Manipulation undermines trust, fuels defence and harms your professional standing, and you.

If you "relapse" after the event

Relapse means texting your ex, social media checking, crying in the bathroom, ruminating until 3 am. It happens, you are human.

  • Stop the guilt spiral. Use a meta view: "I reacted to a strong trigger with an old pattern. From today I will adjust."
  • Concrete plan: 48 hours of social media pause, move your body, prioritise sleep, a brief check-in text to a trusted person (not your ex).
  • Learn: What was the tipping point? What did you need? Next time plan an earlier exit or an extra anchor person.

"Win an ex back" via a work offsite?

One night rarely brings a relationship back. What it can do:

  • Offer a first impression of stability, respect and emotional maturity
  • Check whether minimal warmth exists on both sides
  • Make a small correction to earlier negative impressions

What it should not do:

  • Resolve deep conflicts
  • Ultimatums, confessions, love negotiations

If you are open in principle, opt for safe bonding signals (consistency, empathy, boundaries) rather than pressure. Attachment and trust research shows safety is attractive, unpredictability is risky (Hazan & Shaver; Johnson; Gottman).

Clothing, body language, voice: Subtle safety signals

  • Clothing: Authentic, neat, functional. Aim for competence over glamour.
  • Body language: Open shoulders, calm hands, grounded stance. No oversized gestures, no forced leaning in.
  • Voice: Speak a touch slower, finish sentences, allow pauses. You regulate yourself and the situation.

Digital hygiene before and after

  • Before: Mute your ex’s notifications, archive instead of delete to reduce impulses.
  • During: No proximity/distance stories. No live commentary on your ex’s reactions.
  • After: No DMs to your ex for 72 hours. No debriefs in the team chat. Journal for yourself instead.

Quick science view: Why small steps matter

  • Breakup recovery comes in waves. Fluctuation is normal (Sbarra & Emery). Small controlled exposures can help build new safe schemas if you protect yourself.
  • Social rejection shares networks with physical pain (Kross). Breath, attention and reappraisal reduce the felt intensity.
  • Attachment needs stay active post-breakup (Fraley & Shaver). Soothe them by giving yourself safe signals: predictability, self-care, clear boundaries.

Your personal event compass to print

  • My goal: …
  • My three scripts: …
  • My anchor person(s): …
  • My exit time: …
  • My self-care tomorrow: …

Fill this out beforehand. It stops you from improvising at the crucial moment.

Common thinking traps and correctives

  • Mind reading: "He ignored me, he hates me." Correction: accept ambiguity, gather data, do not interpret.
  • Catastrophising: "This night will ruin everything." Correction: single events are rarely final, focus on the next good step.
  • Personalising: "She laughed, at me." Correction: people act from their state, not against you.

If your ex actively seeks closeness

  • Test intent and sobriety: "Let’s talk another time, in daylight and sober."
  • Stick to your timeline: no deep talk after 10 pm, no chat in the taxi, no room chat.
  • If the initiative stays respectful and sober: consider a short daytime walk days later, with no expectations.

Prefer to skip? Can you say no to the offsite?

  • Work-wise fine if you have valid reasons and no obligation is breached.
  • Psychologically fine if relapse risk is high. Self-protection is legitimate.
  • Communicate professionally, not privately. Do not cite breakup reasons.

Last-minute checklist

  • Water bottle, gum, tissue with calming scent
  • Note with goal, scripts, exit time
  • Contact of a trusted person not involved
  • Comfortable, stable shoes (more control, fewer mishaps)

For advanced users: Orchestrating micro-encounters (reconnection without pressure)

  • 1–2 short positive interactions, never longer than two minutes
  • Shared neutral humour (for example about the weather or the venue)
  • Visible contribution and kindness to everyone, not a selective glow only for your ex
  • No follow-up the same night. If it was good, it stays good without capitalising immediately.

The day after: Stabilise, don’t over-interpret

  • Note as you go: what is fact, what is interpretation?
  • Body work: walk, light training, stretching
  • Social hygiene: 1–2 contacts outside your workplace
  • Media hygiene: no photo replays, no mood music loops

Decision tree: Follow-up after 72 hours

  • If your goal is distance: no follow-up. Only factual work notes if needed.
  • If your goal is to test reconnection AND the night was respectful throughout AND you had 1–2 warm low-key interactions: optionally send a short neutral work-related note ("Thanks for the organising/the input on X, that helped.") No question mark, no proposal.
  • If there was friction, uncertainty or alcohol in the mix: no follow-up. Stabilise, take 2–3 weeks, then contact if needed in a work context.

Common pitfalls in detail and counters

  • "Just a quick chat" in the dark or off to the side: increase visibility, stay in the group area.
  • "Shared trip home": organise your own way home in advance.
  • "They drank and got emotional": be friendly and firm, set boundaries, never relationship talks under influence.

Core principles to take with you

  • Safety over intensity
  • Consistency over brilliance
  • Respect over being right
  • Action over rumination

These align with research on trust, attachment and regulation. Reliability and self-leadership beat short-term theatrics every time.

If the breakup is very recent and you feel high relapse risk, skipping is legitimate. Prioritise self-protection and professionalism. If attendance is required, minimise your time and keep strict boundaries.

Acknowledge the pain, do not react impulsively. Step away, regulate, focus on a task. No jabs, no comparisons. In the long run you win through calm.

It can foster trust through small safe signals, but it does not replace clarifying talks. At most, use it to test mature respectful coexistence. No pressure, no tactics.

Ideally none or at most one drink. Alcohol boosts impulsivity and makes relationship mistakes more likely.

Protect boundaries: stop calmly ("Not here, please"), involve a neutral person, leave the situation. Inform HR later if needed. Document facts.

"Thanks for caring, I keep private matters outside of work." Keep it short, friendly and consistent.

Allow the feeling but find a private space (bathroom, fresh air). Then wash your face, breathe, take a clear action (get water, take a task).

Usually no, give at least 48–72 hours of space. If a work-related follow-up is required, keep it brief and neutral.

Sit near neutral people. Avoid direct line of sight with your ex. Keep exits open.

Deflect to later: "Not tonight. If needed, let’s talk another time when we are sober and unhurried." Hold the boundary.

Bottom line: Hope through posture

A work offsite with your ex is not a night of fate, it is a training ground for self-leadership. With clear goals, scripts and regulation you turn triggers into tests, and tests into trust in yourself. Whether you need distance or prefer to keep a door slightly open, your posture decides. Safe signals, respect, consistency and a clean exit are always the better choice. If something goes wrong, you will learn, adjust and take the next step. That is the path that heals and, if at all, makes real closeness possible again.

What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?

Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic getting back with your ex-partner is - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.

Scientific Sources

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, E. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Fisher, H. E., Xu, X., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275.

MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223.

Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213–232.

Sbarra, D. A. (2006). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 298–312.

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2009). Breakup distress in university students. Adolescence, 44(176), 705–727.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221–233.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed.). Brunner-Routledge.

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402.

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424.

Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separation contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1198–1212.

Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.

Denson, T. F., Moulds, M. L., & Grisham, J. R. (2012). The effects of rumination on anger and aggressive behavior: An experience-sampling study. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(4), 631–639.

Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.

Eddy, B. (2014). BIFF: Quick responses to high-conflict people. HCI Press.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.

Oettingen, G. (2014). Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation. Current.

Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation. W. W. Norton.