How to Handle a Work Outing with Your Ex

Company offsite with your ex? Use a science-based plan for boundaries, small talk, emotions and HR safety. Stay professional and calm, with or without a reunion.

10 min. read Attachment & Psychology

Why you should read this

A work outing is often a social challenge even without a breakup. When your ex is there, triggers, memories and group pressure can turn into a volatile mix. In this guide, you will get science-based strategies from attachment and emotion research, neuropsychology and relationship science. You will learn how to prepare, how to stay calm in tricky moments, how to set boundaries, and how to shape the evening so it serves you long term, whether you need distance or want to carefully test if there is a serious chance for reconnection.

The context: Why a work outing with an ex is different

A work outing blends private emotion with a public stage. You are not one-on-one, you are in a social microcosm with managers, colleagues, team tasks, alcohol, group photos and maybe an overnight stay. This mix increases: (1) the chance of triggers, (2) the risk of impulsive actions, (3) the importance of impression management. There are also opportunities: you can show emotional stability, communicate as equals and demonstrate social skill, all factors that signal safety and increase attractiveness according to attachment research.

Important: a work outing is not a therapy session or reconciliation stage. It is a work event with a clear priority: professionalism and teamwork. This frame protects you, and it requires strategy so you do not fall back into old patterns.

Scientific background: What happens inside you at the "work outing with an ex"

Several research streams explain why encounters with an ex feel so intense:

  • Attachment system: Following Bowlby and Ainsworth, people respond to separation with an attachment alarm. Depending on your attachment style (secure, anxious, avoidant) you may cling, ruminate or withdraw. At work, these reactions are amplified by social evaluation (Hazan & Shaver; Mikulincer & Shaver).
  • Neurochemistry: Romantic rejection activates reward and stress networks similar to addiction and pain systems (Fisher et al.; Kross et al.; MacDonald & Leary). A glance, a scent or a voice can trigger dopaminergic expectation and separation pain at the same time. That is why a neutral “Hi” can feel like a heavy relapse on the inside.
  • Social threat: Humans are highly sensitive to rejection. In group settings like a work outing, perceived exclusion can feel especially painful (Kross; Williams). Do not underestimate how strongly a brief comment or nonverbal cue can hit.
  • Negativity bias: Negative impressions outweigh positive ones (Baumeister et al.). A single slip, for example tears in front of others, can distort your self-view and sometimes your team’s impression. Preparation protects you.

What does that mean in practice? Your biggest resource is emotion regulation. Strategies like reappraisal, attentional control, breathing techniques and planned scripts are effective (Gross). Research on breakup recovery shows that controlled exposure, in small, planned doses, can support healing when you behave safely (Sbarra). A work outing is a natural exposure. Use it intentionally instead of reacting.

The neurochemistry of love has addiction-like features, a look, a message or a memory can kick the reward system back on.

Dr. Helen Fisher , Anthropologist, Kinsey Institute

Core decision: Prioritize distance or test gentle reconnection?

Before you make plans, choose your guiding line:

  • Prioritize distance: You want to heal, reduce rumination and stay professional. The goal is low-emotion, clearly bounded behaviour with no mixed signals.
  • Test reconnection: You want to show, carefully and without pressure, that conditions have improved (for example communication, stability) and see whether your ex responds minimally positively. The goal is not a push-button reunion, it is safe signals.

Both goals require the same basics: stability, respect, boundaries. They differ in the dose and direction of contact offers.

If distance is your goal

  • Minimal, polite interaction
  • Clear time and social boundaries
  • Focus on the team, not on your ex
  • No private topics, no excess alcohol
  • Aftercare with self-compassion

If reconnection is your goal

  • Short, warm, non-committal signals
  • No relationship talk, only light, safe topics
  • Show consistency across the evening
  • Respect every no and every withdrawal
  • Aftercare: do not follow up, give space

Preparation: Your pre-event plan

Good preparation reduces spur-of-the-moment mistakes and makes emotion regulation easier.

  • State your goal in one sentence: “I will stay professional and leave at 10:30 p.m.” Or: “I will project calm, make 3 good team contributions and avoid deep conversations.”
  • Implementation intentions (if–then plans): If I see my ex, then I say, “Hey, good to see you. Have fun tonight!” and walk to person X. If I feel my heart racing, then I will exhale longer than I inhale for 6 breaths.
  • Social anchors: Coordinate with 1 to 2 colleagues who are not involved in the breakup. They are your safe harbour in the group flow.
  • Exit strategy: Plan a plausible reason to leave early (early morning start, early meeting). Ending early is better than derailing late.
  • Define boundaries: No alcohol or max one drink. No debrief about the breakup with coworkers. No private messages to your ex before, during or after the event.
  • Physical priming routine: 5 minutes of brisk walking before the event, 2 minutes of slow extended exhale breathing (inhale 4 seconds, exhale 6 to 8 seconds). Movement and breathing dampen stress systems.
  • Clothing: Choose a look that feels authentic, competent and easy to move in. The goal is not to provoke jealousy, it is to signal safety and self-respect.

Bonus: WOOP plan for the evening

  • Wish: “Stay composed and leave without drama.”
  • Outcome: “I feel proud and professional. The team sees me as steady.”
  • Obstacle (inner): “Jealousy triggers, rumination, urge to talk.”
  • Plan (if–then): “If I feel jealousy, I will step outside for 2 minutes, then complete a micro-task.” Mental contrasting plus implementation intentions strengthen goal commitment (Oettingen; Gollwitzer).

Scripts and sentences: What you can say

When you script behaviour in advance, you can access it in the moment.

  • Neutral greeting: “Hi! Nice to see you. How are you? Have fun tonight!” Smile, brief eye contact, move on.
  • Team small talk: “The view is great. Who is paddling the first leg in the canoe?” Shift topics to the activity and group.
  • Stop overly personal questions: “Happy to talk privately another time. I am sticking to work topics tonight.” Friendly, firm.
  • Alcohol boundary: “Just water for me tonight, I have an early start tomorrow.”
  • Handling digs: “Let’s keep it respectful. I do not want to get into that here.”
  • Praise and warmth (reconnection, dosed): “Thanks for organizing, this is really well planned.” No private subtext.

Note: short sentences, clear I-statements, no over-explaining. You reduce room for interpretation.

BIFF formula for delicate messages or questions

If a written or spontaneous tricky question pops up, answer BIFF:

  • Brief: “Thanks for the info.”
  • Informative: “I am sticking to work topics tonight.”
  • Friendly: “Have a good evening.”
  • Firm: “Let’s discuss private matters another time and sober.” This structure reduces escalation and protects your boundary (Eddy).

Emotion regulation in real time: The 4 most effective tools

From emotion research (Gross) and breakup studies (Sbarra, Field), four tools stand out for the work outing with an ex:

Attentional control
  • Focus on tasks, objects, nature, sounds. Count steps to the fire pit, set up the bowling lane, hold eye contact with teammates instead of your ex.
  • Micro-tasking: “I will bring 3 glasses to the table”, “I will ask 2 colleagues about their project”. Action reduces rumination.
Reappraisal
  • Instead of “He is ignoring me, I do not matter”, say “We are both staying professional. That is respect.”
  • Instead of “She is laughing with others”, say “She is relaxing with the team. Good that the environment is friendly.”
Breathing and body regulation
  • 6 to 8 calm breaths with longer exhales. Drop your shoulders, release your jaw, feel your feet.
  • Kinetic self-soothing: Sip water slowly, rinse hands with cool water, step outside for 30 seconds of fresh air.
Social regulation
  • Brief exchange with a trusted colleague: “I am stepping out for a breath, back in a sec.” No breakup details.

These strategies are not cosmetics. They change stress and reward network activity and subjective social pain (Kross; MacDonald & Leary). A meta-analysis shows adaptive strategies like reappraisal and problem-solving correlate with better long-term wellbeing (Aldao et al.).

Alcohol caution: Alcohol lowers inhibition and amplifies attachment-driven impulses. If your inner voice says “Just one more”, that is often your cue to leave.

Fine-tuning by attachment style

Different patterns need different micro-strategies:

  • Anxious-ambivalent
    • Do: Set clear plans and times in advance, activate your social anchor, practise self-soothing (breath, self-compassion).
    • Don't: Seek subtle reassurance (glances, tests, hints). No “We need to talk” attempts.
    • Line: “I can want closeness and still keep distance tonight to protect myself.”
  • Avoidant
    • Do: Choose polite presence over total withdrawal. Aim for 1 to 2 brief, positive team interactions.
    • Don't: Cold devaluation or ignoring that others can read as hostility.
    • Line: “I can hold boundaries without putting others down.”
  • Disorganized or mixed
    • Do: Small, predictable steps, clear exit times, zero alcohol.
    • Don't: Sudden flips, seeking closeness then pushing away.
    • Line: “Small, consistent actions are safer than intense moments.”

This micro-adjustment increases your sense of inner leadership, which reads as stability to others.

  • Positioning: Stand so you are not directly opposite your ex the whole time. Move naturally, you control sightlines.
  • Activities: Take small, visible, not dominant tasks (coordinate photos, place name cards). This shows competence and distracts.
  • Humour: Use light, inclusive humour. Avoid inside jokes from your past, they can trigger you or confuse others.
  • Avoid coalitions: Do not ask friends to take sides. It increases group pressure and can look unprofessional.
  • No breakup debriefs: Talking about the breakup at work almost always hurts your long-term position and privacy, and it undermines trust, including with your ex.

Remote or hybrid events

  • Camera management: Do not pin your ex’s video feed, use gallery view.
  • Chat hygiene: No private DMs during the event. Skip reaction emojis for your ex.
  • Break pacing: Plan mini breaks between breakout sessions for breathing and reappraisal.
  • Background: Calm, professional frame, no trigger objects in view.
  • Early exit is always an option, let the host know briefly.

The delicate moment: When you end up side by side

These mini islands pop up often at work outings, at the buffet, walking to an activity, by the campfire.

  • Keep it short, 30 to 90 seconds.
  • Choose neutral topics: “How did your sprint review go?” or “That team challenge was fun.”
  • Watch signals: If your ex is curt, respect it immediately. If they are warm, do not automatically extend, stick to your planned dose.
  • Close actively: “I am going to grab some water. See you later.” You lead the situation.

If you are testing reconnection, dosing is the art. Secure signals are warmth, consistency, respect for boundaries and self-regulation, not drama, jealousy or pressure (Gottman; Johnson).

Trigger management: Scents, music, photos, insider spots

Breakup and attachment research show that sensory cues strongly link to memories.

  • Scent: If a perfume or aftershave triggers you, discreetly carry a calming scent you like (for example a drop of essential oil on a tissue).
  • Music: Ask organizers in advance for a playlist without your shared songs if possible. Or use breaks to reset with different music on your own for a moment.
  • Photos: In group photos, aim for neutrality. Do not stand right next to your ex, but do not step far away. Later, avoid story-spinning.
  • Insider spots: If the venue triggers memories, breathe, label it as “memory”, then shift your gaze to new details (colours, sounds). That is in-the-moment reappraisal.

If your ex mentions new dates or flirts

Jealousy is normal and risky. Research shows social rejection feels especially painful and can lead to hostile interpretations (Williams; MacDonald & Leary).

  • Immediate steps: Break eye contact, lengthen your exhale, focus on a task. No snark, no comparisons.
  • Inner line: “This hurts, and I will stay true to myself.” Acknowledge the emotion, avoid reactive behaviour.
  • Behaviour: Stay neutral and keep distance. If needed, leave for a few minutes.

If you are testing reconnection, seeing flirts with others is not a green light. People who want a real restart show respect. Your best response is maturity, paradoxically the most attractive.

HR and safety: When to protect boundaries

  • Confidentiality: Do not share relationship details. It protects you and your professional image.
  • Overstepping: Be clear, “I do not want to discuss that here.” If boundaries are ignored, calmly involve a neutral person or inform HR later.
  • Alcohol and consent: No private advances under the influence. Professionalism first. This protects everyone.
  • Overnights: If the event includes an overnight stay, clarify rooming, seating and shuttles in advance. Transparency prevents misunderstandings.

If you lead a team, you have double responsibility

  • Model boundaries: No hushed private chats, no alcohol excess.
  • Equal treatment: No visible special favours or coldness toward your ex.
  • No performance talks: No feedback or career discussions that night.
  • Conflict prevention: Plan seating, team mix and tasks to reduce tension.
  • Documentation: If incidents occur, document facts promptly and pass to HR or your union representative without value judgments.

Mini opportunities for trust signals without pressure

If you are testing reconnection, focus on five safe micro behaviours:

  • Consistent calm throughout the evening (no mood swings)
  • Prosocial actions with no agenda (offer a seat, lend a hand)
  • Respectful distance: you do not chase closeness, you do not refuse it either
  • No hot topics, no rehashing the past
  • Clean ending: friendly goodbye with no “We need to talk” hook

Gottman’s work suggests stable, positive micro interactions build trust. A work outing can be a stage for that, but only if you control the dose.

5:1

Positive to negative, the rule of thumb for stable impressions (Gottman). Aim for more positive than tricky micro moments.

10 breaths

About this many slow breaths are often enough to reset before you speak.

30 days

Plan a low-contact period after the event to consolidate, especially if it was emotional.

Timeline: Before, during and after the event

Preparation

48 to 72 hours before

  • Define your goal, write scripts, choose clothing
  • Inform your social anchor, set an exit plan
  • Stabilize sleep and nutrition, skip alcohol
Arrival

First 15 minutes

  • Arrive with a smile, neutral small talk
  • Scan the room: seat, exits, anchor person
  • Take 1 to 2 micro tasks
Mid-event

During activities

  • Focus on team tasks, steer eye contact
  • Breathing breaks, short walks, drink water
  • Do not open private or historical topics
Late evening

When fatigue or alcohol kick in

  • Clear boundary: no delicate talks, no relationship talk
  • Friendly early exit if tension rises
Follow-up

24 to 72 hours after

  • Journal: what went well, what triggered you
  • Do not check in with your ex, focus on self-care
  • Consider a therapy or coaching session if helpful

Concrete scenarios and solutions

  • Sarah, 34, Marketing: Fresh breakup, 3 weeks. At a barbecue, her ex loudly praises the steak they used to cook together. Solution: Sarah smiles, says “Good taste wins out” and pivots to “Who wants more salad?” Later she takes a 5 minute walk. Result: no escalation, inner pride.
  • Jason, 41, IT: He wants distance, his ex seeks closeness and asks, “Why do you not text me anymore?” Solution: Jason replies calmly, “I want to respect both of us and keep things work-only tonight.” Then he asks colleague A about the next game.
  • Aaliyah, 29, HR: She wants to gently test reconnection. At bowling her ex sits beside her. Solution: Aaliyah offers a neutral positive note, “Your team handled the cloud migration well, congrats”, stays 2 minutes, then changes seats. Later a friendly farewell, no follow-up.
  • Tom, 38, Sales: His ex flirts with others. Jealousy rises. Solution: Tom steps out briefly, drinks water, repeats “Accept, breathe, act”. He volunteers to facilitate the next round. Action focus over reactivity.
  • Mira, 33, Product: The group pushes for a jokey “ex-couple photo”. Solution: Mira smiles and says, “Team only tonight”, then suggests an alternative group shot. Humour plus boundary.
  • Daniel, 46, Operations: His ex starts talking about the breakup in a small circle. Solution: Daniel says calmly, “I do not want to get into that here. Thanks for understanding.” He moves to colleagues discussing the new ERP.
  • Leila, 27, Customer Success: Overnight event. Her room is next to her ex’s. Solution: She asks organizers early for a switch, “I sleep better at the end of the hall.” Prevention over escalation.
  • Emily, 32, Design: Near the end her ex messages, “Want to talk for a minute?” Solution: Emily checks her goal card, replies, “Not tonight, thanks. Let’s keep it professional.” She leaves on time.

Inner work: Self-talk that works

  • “I am allowed to be hurt, and I will act professionally.”
  • “Their behaviour says nothing about my worth, only about their current state.”
  • “My goal is calm, not winning.”
  • “Attractive is the person who can lead themselves.”

These lines are more than mantras. They operationalize reappraisal and self-regulation, two core mechanisms of effective emotion control (Gross; Nolen-Hoeksema et al.).

Micro exercise in self-compassion (60 to 90 seconds)

  • Name it: “This is a moment of pain or jealousy.”
  • Common humanity: “Lots of people feel this after a breakup. I am not alone.”
  • Kindness: Place a hand on your chest or neck and say quietly, “I am here for me. One step at a time.” Short, evidence-based, it regulates stress and shame (Neff).

What to avoid at all costs

  • Advances or intimate talks under alcohol
  • Passive aggression, digs, old inside jokes
  • “We have to sort this out now”, never at a work outing
  • Coalitions with colleagues against your ex
  • Social media stories with jabs or hidden messages

No-go: Jealousy as a tactic. Manipulation erodes trust, increases defensiveness and hurts your professional standing and your wellbeing.

If you slip after the event

A slip can mean messaging your ex, social media checking, crying in the bathroom, ruminating until 3 a.m. It happens, you are human.

  • Stop guilt spirals. Use a meta view: “I reacted to a strong trigger with an old pattern. Starting today I will adjust.”
  • Concrete plan: 48 hours off social media, move your body, prioritize sleep, brief check-in with a trusted person (not your ex).
  • Learn: What was the tipping point? What did you need? Next time plan an earlier exit or an extra anchor person.

“Get your ex back” via a work outing, is that realistic?

One evening rarely brings a relationship back. What it can do:

  • Create a first impression of stability, respect and emotional maturity
  • Check whether minimal warmth exists on both sides
  • Gently correct past negative impressions

What it should not do:

  • Solve deep conflicts
  • Ultimatums, confessions or love negotiations

If you are open in principle, prioritize secure signals, consistency, empathy and boundaries over pressure. Attachment and trust research shows safety is attractive, unpredictability is risky (Hazan & Shaver; Johnson; Gottman).

Clothing, body language, voice: Subtle safety signals

  • Clothing: Authentic, neat, functional. Aim for competence over glamour.
  • Body language: Open shoulders, calm hands, feet grounded. No oversized gestures, no forced leaning in.
  • Voice: Speak a touch slower, finish your sentences, allow pauses. You regulate yourself and the situation.

Digital hygiene before and after

  • Before: Mute notifications from your ex, archive instead of delete to reduce impulses.
  • During: No stories about proximity or distance. No live commentary on your ex’s reactions.
  • After: 72 hours with no DMs to your ex. No debriefs in the team chat. Journal for yourself instead.

Why small steps matter

  • Breakup recovery comes in waves. Fluctuations are normal (Sbarra & Emery). Small, controlled exposures can help build safe new schemas when you protect yourself.
  • Social rejection shares brain networks with physical pain (Kross). Breathing, attentional control and reappraisal reduce subjective pain intensity.
  • Attachment needs remain active after a breakup (Fraley & Shaver). Soothe them by giving yourself safe signals: predictability, self-care, clear boundaries.

Your personal event compass to print

  • My goal: …
  • My 3 scripts: …
  • My anchor person or people: …
  • My exit time: …
  • My self-care plan for tomorrow: …

Fill this in beforehand. You will not have to improvise in the key moment.

Common cognitive traps and corrections

  • Mind reading: “He ignored me, he hates me.” Correction: accept ambiguity, gather data, do not interpret.
  • Catastrophizing: “This night will ruin everything.” Correction: single events are rarely final, focus on the next good step.
  • Personalizing: “She laughed at me.” Correction: people act from their states, not against you.

If your ex actively seeks closeness

  • Test intent and sobriety: “Let’s talk another time, sober and in calm.”
  • Stick to your timeline: no deep talk after 10 p.m., no conversation in the cab, no room chats.
  • If the initiative stays respectful and sober: set up a brief daytime walk, days later, with no expectations.

Want to skip the work outing instead?

  • Professionally fine if you have good reasons and it does not violate obligations.
  • Psychologically fine if the risk of a slip is high. Self-protection is legitimate.
  • Communicate professionally, not personally. Do not cite breakup reasons.

Last minute checklist

  • Water bottle, gum, tissue with a calming scent
  • Note with your goal, scripts, exit time
  • Contact for a trusted person not involved
  • Comfortable, stable shoes (more control, fewer mishaps)

Advanced: Shaping micro encounters (reconnection without pressure)

  • 1 to 2 short, positive interactions, never longer than 2 minutes
  • Neutral, shared humour (for example the weather or the venue)
  • Visible contribution and kindness to everyone, no selective glow just for your ex
  • No follow-up the same night. If it went well, let it stand without trying to capitalize immediately.

The day after: Stabilize, do not over-interpret

  • Note continuously: what is fact, what is interpretation?
  • Move your body: walk, light workout, stretch
  • Social hygiene: 1 to 2 contacts with people outside work
  • Media hygiene: no photo rewinds, no mood music loop

Decision tree: Follow-up after 72 hours

  • If your goal is distance: no follow-up. Only factual work notes if needed.
  • If your goal is to test reconnection and the night was respectful throughout and there were 1 to 2 warm, low-key interactions: optionally send a short, neutral message with a work link, “Thanks for organizing or for the input on X, it helped.” No question mark, no proposal.
  • If there was friction, uncertainty or alcohol in the mix: no follow-up. Stabilize, 2 to 3 weeks of quiet, then potentially a factual work contact.

Mini pitfalls in detail and counters

  • “Just a quick chat” in the dark or off to the side: increase visibility, stay in group areas.
  • “Shared ride home”: plan your own ride in advance.
  • “They drank and got emotional”: kindly set a boundary, never relationship talks under the influence.

Core principles to take with you

  • Safety over intensity
  • Consistency over brilliance
  • Respect over being right
  • Action over rumination

These align with research on trust, attachment and regulation. Reliability and self-leadership are steadily more attractive and healthier than short-term fireworks.

If it is very fresh and you feel high risk of slipping, skipping is legitimate. Prioritize self-protection and professionalism. If attendance is required, minimize time on site and hold strict boundaries.

Acknowledge the pain and do not react impulsively. Step away briefly, regulate, focus on a task. No jabs, no comparisons. You win long term with calm.

It can build trust through small safe signals, it does not replace clarifying talks. Use it to test mature, respectful coexistence. No pressure, no tactics.

Best is no alcohol or a maximum of one drink. Alcohol increases impulsivity and makes relationship mistakes more likely.

Protect boundaries: stop calmly, “Not here, please”, involve a neutral person, leave the situation. Inform HR later if needed. Document facts.

“Thanks for checking in, I keep private things outside of work.” Keep it short, friendly and consistent.

Allow the feeling, find a private space (washroom, fresh air). Then wash your face, breathe, take a clear action like getting water or a small task.

Generally no, give at least 48 to 72 hours of space. If a work-related follow-up is needed, keep it brief and neutral.

Sit near neutral people. Avoid a direct frontal line with your ex. Keep exits open.

Postpone: “Not tonight. If needed, we can talk another time, sober and in calm.” Hold the boundary.

Conclusion: Hope through posture

A work outing with your ex is not a night of fate, it is training for self-leadership. With clear goals, scripts and emotion regulation, you turn triggers into tests, and tests into trust in yourself. Whether you need distance or want to keep a door gently open, your posture decides. Safe signals, respect, consistency and a clean ending are always the better choice. And if something goes wrong, you learn, adjust and take the next step. That is the path that heals, and the one that makes real closeness possible if at all.

What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?

Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic reconciliation with your ex-partner is - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.

Scientific Sources

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, E. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Fisher, H. E., Xu, X., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275.

MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223.

Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213–232.

Sbarra, D. A. (2006). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 298–312.

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2009). Breakup distress in university students. Adolescence, 44(176), 705–727.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221–233.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What Predicts Divorce? The Relationship Between Marital Processes and Marital Outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The Practice of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy: Creating Connection (2nd ed.). Brunner-Routledge.

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402.

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424.

Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separation contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1198–1212.

Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, C., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.

Denson, T. F., Moulds, M. L., & Grisham, J. R. (2012). The effects of rumination on anger and aggressive behavior: An experience-sampling study. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(4), 631–639.

Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.

Eddy, B. (2014). BIFF: Quick Responses to High-Conflict People. HCI Press.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.

Oettingen, G. (2014). Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation. Current.

Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation. W. W. Norton.