Company away day with your ex: what to do

Work event with your ex? Use evidence-based tactics to stay calm, set boundaries and look professional. Scripts, timeline and tools for real-time regulation.

10 min. read Attachment & Psychology

Why you should read this

A company away day is a social challenge even without a breakup. If your ex is there, triggers, memories and group pressure can turn into a volatile mix. In this guide you get science-backed strategies from attachment and emotion research, neuropsychology and relationship science. You will learn how to prepare, how to stay calm in delicate moments, how to set boundaries, and how to shape the evening so it serves you in the long run, whether you need distance or want to assess a serious chance of reconnection.

The context: Why a work event with your ex plays by different rules

A work event blends private emotions with a public stage. You are not in a duo, you are inside a social microcosm with managers, colleagues, team tasks, alcohol, group photos and possibly an overnight stay. This mix increases: (1) the likelihood of triggers, (2) the risk of rash actions, (3) the importance of impression management. At the same time there are chances: you can show emotional stability, communicate on equal footing and demonstrate social competence, all factors that attachment research links to safety signals and higher attractiveness.

Important: a work event is not a therapy or reconciliation stage. It is mainly a work function with a clear priority: professionalism and teamwork. This frame protects you, and it requires strategic behaviour so you do not slip back into old patterns.

The science: What happens in you at a work event with your ex

Several lines of research explain why encounters with an ex feel so intense:

  • Attachment system: Following Bowlby and Ainsworth, people respond to separation with a kind of attachment alarm. Depending on your style (secure, anxious, avoidant) you tend to cling, ruminate or distance. At work, social evaluation can amplify these patterns (Hazan & Shaver; Mikulincer & Shaver).
  • Neurochemistry: Romantic rejection activates reward and stress networks similar to addiction and pain systems (Fisher et al.; Kross et al.; MacDonald & Leary). A brief glance, a scent or a voice can trigger dopamine expectations and separation pain at once. That is why a neutral "Hi" can feel like a heavy relapse inside.
  • Social threat: Humans are highly sensitive to rejection. In group settings like a work event, rejection feels particularly painful (Kross; Williams). Do not underestimate how strongly a short comment or a nonverbal cue can land.
  • Negativity bias: Negative impressions weigh more than positive ones (Baumeister et al.). A single slip, for example tears in front of others, can distort your view of yourself and sometimes the team’s view. Preparation protects.

What does this mean practically? Your greatest asset is emotion regulation. Strategies like reappraisal, attentional shifting, breathing techniques and planned scripts have proven effects (Gross). Research on breakups and recovery shows that controlled exposure, in small, predictable doses, can support healing when you behave safely (Sbarra). A work event is a natural exposure. Use it deliberately rather than reacting on autopilot.

The neurochemistry of love has addiction-like features, a look, a message, a memory can kick the reward system back into gear.

Dr. Helen Fisher , Anthropologist, Kinsey Institute

Core decision: Prioritise distance or test gentle rapprochement?

Before you plan, pick a guiding line:

  • Prioritise distance: You want to heal, cut rumination and keep things professional. The goal is low-emotion, clearly bounded behaviour with no invitations to interpret.
  • Test rapprochement: You want, gently and without pressure, to show that conditions have improved, for example communication, stability, and see if your ex responds at least minimally positively. The goal is not push button reconciliation, it is safe signalling.

Both aims require the same basics: stability, respect, boundaries. They differ in the dose and direction of contact signals.

If distance is your goal

  • Minimal, polite interaction
  • Clear time and social boundaries
  • Focus on the team, not the ex
  • No private topics, no excess alcohol
  • Post-event self-care

If testing rapprochement is your goal

  • Short, warm but noncommittal signals
  • No relationship talk, only light, safe topics
  • Show consistency throughout the evening
  • Respect any no and any withdrawal
  • Aftercare: no follow up, give space

Preparation: Your pre-event plan

Good preparation reduces snap mistakes and makes emotion regulation easier.

  • State your goal in one sentence: "I will stay professional and leave at 10:30 pm." Or: "I will show calm, contribute well three times to the team and avoid deep conversations."
  • Implementation intentions (if then plans): If I see my ex, then I will say: "Hey, good to see you. Have a nice evening," and walk to person X. If I feel my heart racing, then I will exhale six breaths longer than I inhale.
  • Social anchors: Line up one or two colleagues who are not involved in the breakup. They are your safe harbour in the group flow.
  • Exit strategy: Prepare a plausible reason to leave early, early train, morning appointment. Ending early is always better than late unravelling.
  • Define boundaries: No alcohol or max one drink. No debrief of the breakup with colleagues. No private messages to the ex before, during or after the event.
  • Physical priming routine: 5 minutes brisk walk before the event, 2 minutes slow exhalation, breathe in for 4 seconds, out for 6 to 8 seconds. Movement and breathing dampen stress systems.
  • Clothing: Pick a look that feels authentic, competent and easy to move in. The goal is not to spark jealousy, it is to signal safety and self respect.

Bonus: WOOP plan for the evening

  • Wish: "Stay composed and leave without drama."
  • Outcome: "I feel proud and professional, the team sees me as steady."
  • Obstacle, inner: "Jealousy triggers, rumination, urge to talk."
  • Plan, if then: "If I feel jealousy, then I will step outside for 2 minutes and then complete one micro task." Mental contrasting plus implementation intentions strengthens goal commitment (Oettingen; Gollwitzer).

Scripts and phrases: What you can say

If you formulate your behaviour in advance, you can access it in the moment. Examples:

  • Neutral greeting: "Hi, good to see you. How are you? Enjoy the evening." Smile, brief eye contact, move on.
  • Small talk in the team: "Cracking view. Who is taking the first leg in the canoe?" Shift the topic to the activity and the group.
  • Stop for too personal questions: "Happy to talk privately another time. Tonight I’m sticking to work topics." Friendly and firm.
  • Boundary on alcohol: "Just water for me tonight, early start tomorrow."
  • Handling jabs: "Let’s keep it respectful. I do not want to go into that here."
  • Praise and warmth, rapprochement, measured: "Thanks for organising, this is really well planned." Without private connotation.

Remember: short sentences, clear I statements, no over explaining. This reduces room for interpretation.

The BIFF formula for tricky messages or queries

If a written or spontaneous tricky question pops up, answer BIFF:

  • Brief: "Thanks for the info."
  • Informative: "For tonight I will stick to work topics."
  • Friendly: "Hope you have a good evening."
  • Firm: "Let’s speak about private matters another time and sober." This structure reduces escalation and protects your boundary (Eddy).

Real-time emotion regulation: The 4 most effective tools

From emotion research (Gross) and breakup studies (Sbarra, Field) we can derive four tools for the work event with ex:

Attentional shifting
  • Focus on tasks, objects, nature, sounds. Count steps to the fire pit, straighten the bowling lane, keep eye contact with teammates rather than the ex.
  • Micro tasking: "I will carry three glasses to the table now", "I will ask two colleagues about their project." Action reduces rumination.
Reappraisal
  • Instead of "He ignores me, I do not matter": "We are both being professional. That is respect."
  • Instead of "She is laughing with others": "She is relaxing with the team. Good to have a friendly atmosphere."
Breath and body regulation
  • 6 to 8 calm breaths with a longer exhale. Drop your shoulders, relax your jaw, feel your feet.
  • Kinetic self soothing: Drink water slowly, rinse your hands briefly in cold water, step outside for 30 seconds.
Social regulation
  • Brief exchange with a trusted colleague: "I am taking a quick breather, back in a mo." No breakup details.

These strategies are not window dressing. They change the activity of stress and reward networks and the subjective pain of social rejection (Kross; MacDonald & Leary). A meta analysis shows that adaptive strategies like reappraisal and problem solving link to better wellbeing in the long term (Aldao et al.).

Mind alcohol: Drink reduces inhibition and amplifies impulsive attachment reactions. If your inner voice says "just one more", that is often your cue to leave.

Fine tuning by attachment style

Different patterns need different micro strategies:

  • Anxious ambivalent
    • Do: Set clear plans and times beforehand, activate your social anchor, practise self soothing, breath, self compassion.
    • Don't: Subtly seeking reassurance, looks, tests, hints. No "we need to talk" attempts.
    • Line: "I can want closeness and still keep distance tonight, to protect myself."
  • Avoidant
    • Do: Measured, polite presence instead of total withdrawal. One or two short positive team interactions.
    • Don't: Cold devaluation or ignoring that others may read as hostility.
    • Line: "I can hold boundaries without putting others down."
  • Disorganised or mixed
    • Do: Small, predictable steps, clear exit times, zero alcohol.
    • Don't: Sudden switches, seeking closeness then pushing away.
    • Line: "Small, consistent actions are safer than intense moments."

This micro adjustment increases your sense of inner leadership, which reads as stability from the outside.

Group dynamics: How to move with confidence in the team

  • Positioning: Stand so you are not facing your ex for long stretches. Move naturally, this lets you control sight lines.
  • Activities: Take on small, visible but not dominant tasks, coordinate photos, set out place cards. This signals competence and is a helpful distraction.
  • Humour: Use light, inclusive humour. Avoid in jokes from your relationship, they can trigger you or alienate others.
  • Avoid coalitions: Do not ask friends to take sides. It ramps up group pressure and looks unprofessional.
  • No breakup debriefs: Talking about the relationship in the team almost always hurts your long term position and privacy, and undermines trust, including with your ex.

Remote or hybrid events

  • Camera management: Do not pin your ex’s tile, use gallery view.
  • Chat hygiene: No private DMs during the event. Skip reaction emojis for your ex.
  • Breaks: Plan mini breaks between breakout sessions for breathing and reappraisal.
  • Background: Calm, professional setting, no trigger objects in shot.
  • Early exit remains possible, let the host know briefly.

The tricky moment: When you end up side by side

These little islands pop up often at work events, by the buffet, on the way to the activity, near the fire pit.

  • Keep the window short, 30 to 90 seconds.
  • Choose neutral topics: "How did your sprint review go?" "The team challenge was good craic."
  • Watch signals: If your ex is curt, respect it. If they are warm, do not lengthen by default, stick to your planned dose.
  • Make an active exit: "I am grabbing some water. Catch you later." You lead the situation.

If you are testing rapprochement, the art is dosing. Secure signals are warmth, consistency, respect for boundaries and self regulation, not drama, jealousy or pressure (Gottman; Johnson).

Trigger management: Smells, music, photos, insider spots

Breakup and attachment research show that senses bind to memories.

  • Scent: If perfume or aftershave triggers you, bring a discreet calming scent, for example a drop of essential oil on a tissue.
  • Music: Ask the organisers in advance for a playlist without your songs if possible. Or use short music switches in breaks, quick headphones time.
  • Photos: If group photos happen, aim for neutral. Do not stand right next to your ex, but do not step out obviously either. Later, avoid story making.
  • Insider spots: If the venue holds memories, breathe, label internally "memory", and direct your gaze to new details, colours, sounds. That is reappraisal in real time.

If your ex mentions new dates or flirts

Jealousy is normal and risky. Research shows social rejection hurts and easily leads to hostile interpretations (Williams; MacDonald & Leary).

  • Immediate steps: Break eye contact, lengthen your breathing, focus on a task. No ironic digs, no comparisons.
  • Inner line: "This hurts, and I stay true to myself." Accept the emotion, avoid reactive action.
  • Behaviour: Stay neutral, keep distance. If needed, leave for a few minutes.

Testing rapprochement? Flirting with others is not a green light. If someone is serious about a new start, they show respect. Your best response is maturity, which is paradoxically the most attractive.

HR and safety: When to protect your boundaries

  • Confidentiality: Do not discuss relationship details. This protects you and your professional image.
  • Overstepping: Stay clear, "I do not want to discuss this here." If boundaries are ignored, bring in a neutral person calmly or inform HR later.
  • Alcohol and consent: No private advances under the influence. Professionalism comes first. This protects everyone.
  • Overnights: If the event includes a night away, clarify rooms, seating, shuttle in advance. Transparency prevents misunderstandings.

If you are a manager, double responsibility

  • Role modelling: Model boundaries, no intimate whispering, no excess drinking.
  • Equal treatment: No visible special attention or chilliness toward the ex.
  • No performance chats: No feedback or career talks that night.
  • Conflict prevention: Plan seating, team mix and tasks to reduce tension.
  • Documentation: If incidents occur, document promptly and factually and pass to HR or your employee representative, without value judgements.

Mini opportunities for trust signals without pressure

If you are testing rapprochement, focus on five safe micro behaviours:

  • Consistent calm throughout the evening, no mood swings
  • Pro social actions without agenda, offer a seat, help out
  • Respectful distance: you do not chase closeness, you do not refuse it either
  • No sensitive topics, no digging up the past
  • Clean ending: friendly goodbye without a we need to talk hook

Gottman’s work suggests that stable, positive micro interactions build trust. A work event can be a stage for this, but only if you control the dose.

5:1

Positives to negatives, the rule of thumb for stable impressions (Gottman). Aim for more positive than tricky micro moments.

10 breaths

That many conscious breaths often help you round the inner corner before you speak.

30 days

Plan a low contact phase after the event to consolidate, especially if it was emotional.

Timeline: Before, during and after the event

Preparation

48 to 72 hours before

  • Define your goal, write scripts, choose clothing
  • Inform your social anchor, set an exit plan
  • Stabilise sleep and nutrition, skip alcohol
Arrival

First 15 minutes

  • Greet with a smile, neutral small talk
  • Scan the room: seating, exits, anchor person
  • Take on one or two micro tasks
Middle

During activities

  • Focus on team wins, steer eye contact
  • Breath breaks, short walks, drink water
  • Do not open private or historical topics
Late evening

When tiredness or alcohol kick in

  • Clear line: no sensitive conversations, no relationship talk
  • Early, friendly goodbye if tension rises
Aftercare

24 to 72 hours after

  • Journal: what went well, what triggered you
  • No checking in with your ex, choose self care instead
  • Consider a therapy or coaching session

Concrete scenarios and solutions

  • Aoife, 34, marketing: Fresh breakup, 3 weeks. At the barbecue her ex stands opposite and loudly praises the steak they used to cook together. Solution: Aoife smiles, says "Good taste wins out" and shifts to "Who wants more salad?" Later she takes a 5 minute walk. Result: no escalation, inner pride.
  • Conor, 41, IT: He wants distance, yet the ex seeks closeness and asks: "Why do you not message me any more?" Solution: Conor answers calmly: "I want to respect both sides and leave private matters out tonight." Then he asks colleague A about the next game.
  • Niamh, 29, HR: She wants to test gentle rapprochement. At bowling her ex sits next to her. Solution: Niamh brings a neutral, positive topic, "Your team handled the cloud migration well, fair play", stays 2 minutes, then changes seats. Later a friendly goodbye, no follow up.
  • Liam, 38, sales: The ex flirts. Jealousy rises. Solution: Liam steps out briefly, drinks water, runs the inner cue "accept, breathe, act". He volunteers to host the next round, action focus instead of reactivity.
  • Ciara, 33, product: The group asks for a fun ex couple photo. Solution: Ciara laughs lightly, says "Team only tonight" and suggests an alternative group photo. Humour plus boundary.
  • Seán, 46, operations: The ex starts talking about the breakup in a small circle. Solution: Seán says calmly: "I do not want to discuss that here. Thanks for understanding." He moves to colleagues chatting about the new ERP.
  • Orla, 27, customer success: Overnight event. Her room is next to her ex. Solution: She asks the organisers early for a swap, "I sleep better at the end of the corridor." Prevention over escalation.
  • Eimear, 32, design: Near the end a message from the ex: "Fancy a quick chat?" Solution: Eimear checks her goal card. She replies: "Not tonight, thanks. Let’s keep the evening professional." Then she leaves on time.

Inner work: Self talk that works

  • "I am allowed to be hurt, and I act professionally."
  • "Their behaviour says nothing about my worth, only about their current state."
  • "My goal is calm, not winning."
  • "Attractive is the person who can lead themselves."

These lines are more than mantras. They implement reappraisal and self regulation, both core mechanisms of effective emotion control (Gross; Nolen Hoeksema et al.).

Micro exercise self compassion, 60 to 90 seconds

  • Label: "This is a moment of pain or jealousy."
  • Common humanity: "Many people feel this after a breakup, I am not alone."
  • Kindness: Place a hand on chest or neck and say quietly: "I am here for myself. One step at a time." Short, evidence based, calming for stress and shame (Neff).

What to avoid at all costs

  • Advances or intimate talks under the influence
  • Passive aggression, jabs, in jokes from your relationship
  • "We need to sort this now" never at a work event
  • Coalitions with colleagues against the ex
  • Social media stories with digs or hidden messages

No go: Jealousy as a tactic. Manipulation erodes trust, fuels defensiveness and harms your professional standing and yourself.

If you slip after the event

Slip means: messaging the ex, social media stalking, crying in the loo, ruminating till 3 am. It happens, you are human.

  • Stop the guilt spiral. Use meta perspective: "I reacted to a strong trigger with an old pattern. From today I will adjust."
  • Concrete plan: 48 hours social media break, move your body, prioritise sleep, a short check in to a trusted person, not the ex.
  • Learn: What was the tipping point, what did you need, plan an earlier exit time next round or an extra anchor person.

Getting back together via a work event?

One evening rarely restores a relationship. What it can deliver:

  • A first impression of stability, respect and emotional maturity
  • A check if there is minimal, calm warmth on both sides
  • A small correction of earlier negative impressions

What it should not do:

  • Resolve deep conflicts
  • Ultimatums, confessions, love negotiations

If you are open in principle, lean on secure signals, consistency, empathy, boundaries, not pressure. Attachment and trust research shows: safety is attractive, unpredictability is risky (Hazan & Shaver; Johnson; Gottman).

Clothing, body language, voice: Subtle safety signals

  • Clothing: Authentic, neat, functional. Aim for competence over glamour.
  • Body language: Open shoulders, calm hands, standing with ground contact. No oversized gestures, no instant leaning in.
  • Voice: Speak a bit slower, finish sentences, allow pauses. This regulates you and the situation.

Digital hygiene before and after

  • Before: Mute notifications from your ex, archive instead of delete to reduce impulses.
  • During: No stories about distance or closeness. No live commentary on your ex’s reactions.
  • After: 72 hours without DM to the ex. No debriefs in the team chat. Journal for yourself instead.

The short science bit: Why small steps matter

  • Recovery after breakup comes in waves. Fluctuations are normal (Sbarra & Emery). Small, controlled exposures can help build safe patterns when you protect yourself.
  • Social rejection shares brain networks with physical pain (Kross). Breath, attentional shifting and reappraisal change the subjective pain.
  • Attachment needs stay active after a breakup (Fraley & Shaver). You calm them by giving yourself safe signals: predictability, self care, clear boundaries.

Your printable event compass

  • My goal: …
  • My three scripts: …
  • My anchor person or people: …
  • My exit time: …
  • My self care the next day: …

Fill this in beforehand. You will not need to improvise in the crucial moment.

Common thinking traps and corrections

  • Mind reading: "He ignores me, he hates me." Correction: accept ambiguity, gather data, avoid interpreting.
  • Catastrophising: "This evening ruins everything." Correction: single events are rarely final, focus on the next good step.
  • Personalising: "She laughs, against me." Correction: people act from their states, not against you.

If your ex actively seeks closeness

  • Test intent and sobriety: "Let’s talk about this another time and sober."
  • Stick to your timeline: no deep talk after 10 pm, no chat in a taxi, no room conversations.
  • If the initiative stays respectful and sober: arrange, days later if needed, a short daytime walk without expectations.

Prefer to skip the event? Is it OK?

  • Professionally OK if you have good reasons and it does not breach clear duties.
  • Psychologically OK if the risk of a slip is high. Self protection is legitimate.
  • Communicate professionally, not privately. Do not cite the breakup.

Checklist: Last minute before you leave

  • Water bottle, chewing gum, tissue with calming scent
  • Note with goal, scripts, exit time
  • Contact of a trusted person not involved
  • Comfortable, secure shoes, more control, fewer mishaps

For advanced readers: Shaping micro encounters, rapprochement without pressure

  • One or two short, positive interactions, never longer than 2 minutes
  • Shared, neutral humour, for example the weather, the venue
  • Visible contribution and kindness to everyone, no selective glow only for the ex
  • No follow up the same night. If it was good, it stays good without you trying to cash in.

The day after: Stabilise rather than interpret

  • Note as you go: what is fact, what is interpretation
  • Body work: walk, light training, stretching
  • Social hygiene: one or two contacts with people outside work
  • Media hygiene: no photo rehash, no mood music loop

Decision tree: Follow up after 72 hours

  • If your goal is distance: no follow up. Only factual work notes if needed.
  • If your goal is to test rapprochement AND the evening was respectful throughout AND there were one or two warm, calm interactions: optionally a short, neutral message with a work hook, "Thanks for organising or for the input on X, that helped." no question mark, no suggestion.
  • If there was friction, uncertainty or alcohol in the mix: no follow up. Stabilise, give it 2 to 3 weeks, then if needed, a factual contact within a work context.

Mini pitfalls and counters

  • "Just a quick chat" in the dark or off to the side: increase visibility, stay in the group area.
  • "Shared way home": set your own way home in advance.
  • "They have been drinking and get emotional": set a friendly, clear boundary, never relationship talks under the influence.

Core principles to take away

  • Safety over intensity
  • Consistency over brilliance
  • Respect over being right
  • Action over rumination

These principles align with research on trust, attachment and regulation. Reliability and self leadership are more attractive and healthier than short term fireworks.

If the breakup is very fresh and you feel a high risk of slipping, it is legitimate to skip. Prioritise self protection and professionalism. If attendance is required, minimise your time there and hold strict boundaries.

Acknowledge the pain, do not react impulsively. Step out briefly, regulate, focus on a task. No digs, no comparisons. You win long term through calm.

It can build trust through small, safe signals, but it does not replace clear conversations. Use it at most as a test of mature, respectful coexistence. No pressure, no tactics.

Ideally alcohol free or at most one drink. Alcohol raises impulsivity and makes relationship mistakes more likely.

Protect your boundary: stop it calmly, "Not here please", bring in a neutral person, leave the situation. Inform HR later if needed. Document incidents factually.

"Thanks for the concern, I keep private matters outside work." Keep it short, friendly, consistent.

Allow the feeling, find a private space, loo or fresh air. Then wash your face, breathe, take a clear action, get water, take on a task.

Generally no, give it 48 to 72 hours. If a work related follow up is necessary, keep it brief and neutral.

Sit near neutral people. Avoid direct face off with your ex. Keep exits open.

Postpone: "Not tonight. If needed, we’ll talk another time and sober." Hold the boundary.

Conclusion: Hope through stance

A work event with your ex is not fate night, it is a training ground for self leadership. With clear goals, scripts and emotion regulation you turn triggers into tests, and tests into trust in yourself. Whether you need distance or gently keep a door ajar, your stance decides. Safe signals, respect, consistency and a clean ending are always the better choice. And if something goes wrong, you learn, adjust and take the next step. That is the path that heals, and the path that, if at all, makes real closeness possible again.

What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?

Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic reconciliation with your ex-partner is - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.

Scientific Sources

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, E. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualised as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Fisher, H. E., Xu, X., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275.

MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223.

Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213–232.

Sbarra, D. A. (2006). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 298–312.

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2009). Breakup distress in university students. Adolescence, 44(176), 705–727.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behaviour, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221–233.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed.). Brunner-Routledge.

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402.

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424.

Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separation contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1198–1212.

Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.

Denson, T. F., Moulds, M. L., & Grisham, J. R. (2012). The effects of rumination on anger and aggressive behaviour: An experience-sampling study. Journal of Behavioural Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(4), 631–639.

Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.

Eddy, B. (2014). BIFF: Quick responses to high-conflict people. HCI Press.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.

Oettingen, G. (2014). Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation. Current.

Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualisation of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation. W. W. Norton.