Work function with your ex: how to handle it well

Work function with your ex? Learn calm, evidence-based strategies to set boundaries, avoid drama and stay professional. NZ-focused tips and scripts.

18 min. read Attachment & Psychology

Why you should read this

A work function is a social challenge even without a breakup. If your ex is there, triggers, memories and group pressure can become a volatile cocktail. In this guide you get evidence-based strategies from attachment and emotion research, neuropsychology and relationship science. You will learn how to prepare, how to stay calm in tricky moments, how to set boundaries - and how to shape the night so it serves you long term, whether you need distance or want to carefully assess a genuine chance to reconnect.

The context: why a work function with your ex plays by different rules

A work function mixes private emotions with a public stage. You are not one-on-one, you are in a social microcosm with managers, colleagues, team activities, alcohol, group photos and possibly an overnight stay. This mix increases: (1) the likelihood of triggers, (2) the risk of impulsive behaviour, (3) the importance of impression management. There are also opportunities: you can show emotional stability, communicate as equals and demonstrate social skill - all factors that, according to attachment research, signal safety and increase attractiveness.

Important: a work function is not a stage for therapy or reconciliation. It is first and foremost a work event with a clear priority: professionalism and teamwork. This frame protects you, and it requires a strategy so you do not slip into old patterns.

The science: what happens in you at the "work function with an ex"

Several lines of research explain why encounters with an ex feel so intense:

  • Attachment system: Following Bowlby and Ainsworth, breakups trigger a "bonding alarm". Depending on your attachment style (secure, anxious, avoidant) you may cling, ruminate or distance. At work, social evaluation can amplify these patterns (Hazan & Shaver; Mikulincer & Shaver).
  • Neurochemistry: Romantic rejection activates reward and stress networks similar to addiction and pain systems (Fisher et al.; Kross et al.; MacDonald & Leary). A glance, a scent or a voice can trigger dopaminergic expectation and separation pain at the same time. That is why a neutral "Hi" can feel internally like a major relapse.
  • Social threat: Humans are highly sensitive to rejection. In group settings like a work function, exclusion feels especially painful (Kross; Williams). Do not underestimate how much a brief comment or nonverbal cue can sting.
  • Negativity bias: Negative impressions weigh more than positive ones (Baumeister et al.). A single "slip" (for example, tears in front of others) can distort your self-view, and sometimes the team’s view. Preparation protects.

What does this mean in practice? Your greatest resource is emotion regulation. Strategies like reappraisal, attentional control, breathing techniques and pre-planned scripts are proven to help (Gross). Studies on breakups and recovery show that controlled exposure - in small, planned doses - can support healing when you behave safely (Sbarra). A work function is a form of natural exposure: use it deliberately instead of reacting.

The neurochemistry of love has addiction-like features, a glance, a text, a memory can switch the reward system back on.

Dr. Helen Fisher , Anthropologist, Kinsey Institute

Core decision: prioritise distance or test a gentle approach?

Before you plan, pick a guiding direction:

  • Prioritise distance: You want to heal, reduce rumination and stay professional. Aim for low-emotion, clearly bounded behaviour with no room for misreadings.
  • Test a gentle approach: You want to, carefully and without pressure, show that conditions have improved (for example, communication, stability) and see if your ex responds at least minimally positively. The goal is not an instant reunion, it is safe signals.

Both require the same basics: stability, respect, boundaries. They differ in the dose and direction of contact bids.

If distance is your goal

  • Minimal, polite interaction
  • Clear time and social boundaries
  • Focus on the team, not the ex
  • No private topics, no excess alcohol
  • Aftercare with self-compassion

If you are testing reconnection

  • Brief, warm but non-committal signals
  • No relationship talk, only light, safe topics
  • Show consistency across the night
  • Respect every "no" and any retreat
  • Aftercare: do not follow up, leave room

Preparation: your pre-event plan

Good preparation reduces snap mistakes and makes regulation easier.

  • State your goal in one sentence: "I will stay professional and leave at 10:30 pm." Or: "I will show calm, make 3 solid team contributions and avoid deep talks."
  • Implementation intentions (if-then plans): If I see my ex, then I say: "Hey, good to see you. Have a good one tonight!" and head to Person X. If I feel my heart racing, then I exhale longer than I inhale for 6 breaths.
  • Social anchors: Line up 1–2 colleagues who are uninvolved in the breakup. They are your safe harbour in the group flow.
  • Exit strategy: Prepare a plausible reason to leave early (early train, morning commitment). Finishing early beats unraveling late.
  • Define boundaries: No alcohol or max one drink. No debrief of the breakup with the team. No private messages to the ex before, during or after the event.
  • Physical priming: 5 minutes of brisk walking before the event, 2 minutes of slow exhale breathing (inhale 4 seconds, exhale 6–8 seconds). Movement and breath calm stress systems.
  • Clothing: Choose a look that feels authentic, competent and comfortable. The aim is not to spark jealousy, it is to signal safety and self-respect.

Extra: your WOOP plan for the night

  • Wish: "Stay composed and leave without drama."
  • Outcome: "I feel proud and professional, the team sees me as steady."
  • Obstacle (inner): "Jealousy triggers, rumination, urge to talk."
  • Plan (If-Then): "If I feel jealousy, then I step outside for 2 minutes and complete a micro task afterwards." This mental contrasting plus implementation intentions boosts goal commitment (Oettingen; Gollwitzer).

Scripts and lines: what you can actually say

If you shape your behaviour beforehand, you can access it in the moment. Examples:

  • Neutral greeting: "Hi! Good to see you. How are you? Enjoy tonight!" Smile, brief eye contact, move on.
  • Team small talk: "The view is great. Who is taking the first leg in the kayak?" Shift the topic to the activity and the group.
  • Stop overly personal questions: "Happy to talk privately another time. I’m keeping it work-focused tonight." Friendly, firm.
  • Alcohol boundary: "Just water for me tonight, I have an early start."
  • Handling digs: "Let’s keep it respectful. I don’t want to go into that here."
  • Praise and warmth (reconnection, dosed): "Thanks for organising, this is really well planned." No private undertones.

Remember: short sentences, clear I-statements, no over-explaining. This reduces room for misinterpretation.

The BIFF method for tricky messages or questions

If a written or spontaneous tricky question comes up, reply BIFF:

  • Brief: "Thanks for the info."
  • Informative: "I’m keeping to work topics tonight."
  • Friendly: "Hope you have a good evening."
  • Firm: "Let’s discuss private matters another time, and sober." This structure reduces escalation and protects your boundary (Eddy).

Emotion regulation in real time: the 4 most effective tools

From emotion research (Gross) and breakup studies (Sbarra, Field) four tools apply to the work function with your ex:

Attentional control
  • Focus on tasks, objects, nature, sounds. Count steps to the fire pit, set up the games area, maintain eye contact with teammates rather than your ex.
  • Micro-tasking: "I’ll take these 3 glasses to the table", "I’ll ask two colleagues about their project". Doing reduces rumination.
Reappraisal
  • Instead of "He is ignoring me, I mean nothing": "We are both keeping it professional. That is a sign of respect."
  • Instead of "She is laughing with others": "She is relaxing with the team. Good that the vibe is friendly."
Breath and body regulation
  • 6–8 calm breaths with a longer exhale. Drop your shoulders, loosen your jaw, feel your feet.
  • Kinetic self-soothing: Sip water slowly, rinse hands with cool water, step outside for 30 seconds of fresh air.
Social regulation
  • Brief check-in with a trusted colleague: "I’m grabbing some air, be right back." No breakup details.

These are not cosmetic. They measurably shift stress and reward networks and the subjective pain of social rejection (Kross; MacDonald & Leary). A meta-analysis shows that adaptive strategies like reappraisal and problem solving are linked to better long-term wellbeing (Aldao et al.).

Watch alcohol: alcohol lowers inhibition and ramps up impulsive attachment reactions. If your inner voice says "Just one more", that is usually your cue to head off.

Fine-tuning by attachment style

Different patterns benefit from different micro strategies:

  • Anxious-preoccupied
    • Do: Set clear plans and times in advance, activate your social anchor, practise self-soothing (breath, self-compassion).
    • Don’t: Fish for reassurance with looks, tests or hints. No "We need to talk" attempts.
    • Line: "I can want closeness and still keep distance tonight, for my own safety."
  • Avoidant
    • Do: Show measured, polite presence instead of a total retreat. Aim for 1–2 brief, positive team interactions.
    • Don’t: Cold devaluation or blanking that can read as hostility.
    • Line: "I can hold boundaries without putting others down."
  • Disorganised/fearful
    • Do: Small, predictable steps, clear exit times, zero alcohol.
    • Don’t: Whiplash shifts (seeking closeness then pushing away).
    • Line: "Small, consistent actions are safer than intense moments."

This micro-adjustment boosts your sense of inner leadership, and that reads as stability to others.

Group dynamics: how to move with confidence in the team

  • Positioning: Stand so you are not facing your ex the whole time. Move naturally, you control sight lines.
  • Activities: Take small, visible, non-dominant tasks (coordinate photos, sort place cards). This shows competence and distracts.
  • Humour: Use light, inclusive humour. Avoid insider jokes from your past together, they can trigger or alienate others.
  • Avoid coalitions: Do not ask friends to take sides. It ramps up group pressure and looks unprofessional.
  • No breakup debriefs: Talking about the breakup at work almost always harms your long-term position and privacy, and undermines trust, including with your ex.

Remote or hybrid events

  • Camera management: Do not pin your ex’s screen, use gallery view.
  • Chat hygiene: No private DMs during the event. Skip reaction emojis on your ex’s comments.
  • Pause control: Plan mini breaks between breakout sessions for breathing and reappraisal.
  • Background: Calm, professional setting, no trigger objects in view.
  • Early exit is always an option, let the host know briefly.

The tricky moment: when you end up side by side

These mini islands are common at work functions, at the buffet, walking to an activity, by the fire pit.

  • Keep it short (30–90 seconds).
  • Choose neutral topics: "How did your sprint review go?" "That team challenge was a laugh."
  • Watch signals: If your ex is brief, respect it straight away. If they respond warmly, do not automatically extend, stick to your planned dose.
  • Close proactively: "I’ll grab some water. Catch you later!" You lead the situation.

If you are testing reconnection, dosage is the art. Secure signals are warmth, consistency, respect for boundaries and self-regulation, not drama, jealousy or pressure (Gottman; Johnson).

Trigger management: smells, music, photos, insider places

Breakup and attachment research show how tightly senses link to memory.

  • Scent: If perfume/aftershave triggers you, bring your own calming scent (for example, a drop of essential oil on a tissue) discreetly.
  • Music: Ask the organiser beforehand for a playlist without your shared "songs" if possible. Or use short music resets during breaks (quick headphones out time).
  • Photos: If group photos happen, aim for neutral. Do not stand directly next to your ex, but do not step away obviously either. Later: no story reading.
  • Insider places: If the venue holds memories, breathe, label it internally as "memory", and shift your gaze to new details (colour, sounds). That is reappraisal in real time.

If your ex mentions new dates or flirts

Jealousy is normal and risky. Research shows social rejection is especially painful and easily sparks hostile interpretations (Williams; MacDonald & Leary).

  • Immediate steps: Break eye contact, lengthen your exhale, focus on a task. No snark, no comparisons.
  • Inner line: "This hurts, and I stay true to myself." Acknowledge the emotion, avoid reactive behaviour.
  • Behaviour: Stay neutral, keep distance. If needed, leave the situation for a few minutes.

Testing reconnection? Flirting with others is not a green light. Someone serious about a fresh start signals respect. Your best move is maturity, paradoxically that is most attractive.

HR and safety: when to protect your boundaries

  • Confidentiality: Do not share relationship details. It protects you and your professional image.
  • Overstepping: Be clear, "I don’t want to discuss that here." If boundaries are ignored, quietly involve a neutral person or inform HR later.
  • Alcohol and consent: No private advances under the influence. Professionalism first. That protects everyone.
  • Overnights: If the event includes a night away, sort rooms, seating and shuttles early. Clarity prevents misunderstandings.

If you are a manager - double the responsibility

  • Model behaviour: Model boundaries (no hushed chats, no overdrinking).
  • Equal treatment: No obvious extra attention or chilliness toward the ex.
  • No performance talks: No feedback or career chats on the night.
  • Prevent conflict: Plan seating, team mix and tasks to reduce tension.
  • Documentation: If incidents occur, document promptly and factually and share with HR or your union delegate, no editorialising.

Micro chances to signal trust - without pressure

If you are testing reconnection, focus on five safe micro behaviours:

  • Consistent calm across the night (no swings)
  • Prosocial actions with no strings attached (offer a seat, help out)
  • Respectful distance: you are not chasing, you do not need closeness, and you do not refuse it outright either
  • No hot-button topics, no rehashing the past
  • Clean ending: friendly goodbye with no "We need to talk" hook

Gottman’s work suggests that stable, positive micro interactions build trust. A work function can be a stage for that, but only if you control the dose.

5:1

Positive to negative, the rule of thumb for stable impressions (Gottman). Aim for more positive than tricky micro moments.

10 breaths

That many deliberate breaths often help you regain your curve before you speak.

30 days

Plan a low-contact period after the event to consolidate, especially if it was emotional.

Timeline: before, during and after

Preparation

48–72 hours before

  • Define your goal, write scripts, choose clothing
  • Brief your social anchor, lock in your exit plan
  • Stabilise sleep and food, avoid alcohol
Arrival

The first 15 minutes

  • Arrive with a smile, neutral small talk
  • Scan the room: seat, exits, anchor person
  • Take on 1–2 micro tasks
Mid-event

During activities

  • Focus on team outcomes, steer your eye contact
  • Breath breaks, short walks, drink water
  • Do not open private or historical topics
Late evening

When fatigue/alcohol kick in

  • Clear rule: no tricky talks, no relationship chat
  • Early, friendly exit if tension rises
Follow-up

24–72 hours after

  • Journal: what worked, what triggered
  • Do not check in with the ex, practise self-care instead
  • Consider therapy or coaching time

Concrete scenarios and solutions

  • Sophie, 34, Marketing: Fresh breakup (3 weeks). At the barbecue her ex raves about the steak they used to cook together. Solution: Sophie smiles, says "Good taste never dies" and pivots to "Who wants more salad?" Later she takes a 5 minute walk. Result: no escalation, quiet pride.
  • Jack, 41, IT: He wants distance, but his ex seeks closeness and asks: "Why don’t you text me anymore?" Solution: Jack answers calmly: "I want to respect both sides and keep private things out of tonight." Then he asks colleague A about the next game.
  • Aria, 29, HR: She wants to gently test reconnection. At bowling her ex sits beside her. Solution: Aria brings a neutral, positive topic ("Your team handled the cloud migration well, congrats"), stays 2 minutes, then changes seats. Later a friendly farewell - no follow up.
  • Liam, 38, Sales: His ex is flirting with others. Liam feels jealousy rising. Solution: Liam steps out briefly, drinks water, runs his inner cue "Accept, breathe, act". He volunteers to MC the next round, action over reactivity.
  • Maia, 33, Product: The group demands a "just for fun ex-couple pic". Solution: Maia smiles, says "Team only tonight" and suggests an all-in team photo. Humour and a boundary.
  • Daniel, 46, Operations: The ex starts talking about the breakup in a small group. Solution: Daniel says calmly: "I don’t want to discuss that here. Thanks for understanding." He moves to colleagues chatting about the new ERP.
  • Leila, 27, Customer Success: Overnight offsite. Her room is next to her ex’s. Solution: She asks the organiser early for a swap ("I sleep better at the end of the corridor"). Prevention beats escalation.
  • Emily, 32, Design: Near the end, a message from the ex: "Want to chat quickly?" Solution: Emily checks her goal card. She replies: "Not tonight, thanks. Let’s keep it professional." Then she leaves on time.

Inner work: self-talk that actually helps

  • "I am allowed to be hurt, and I act professionally."
  • "Their behaviour says nothing about my worth, only about their current state."
  • "My goal is calm, not victory."
  • "Attractive is the person who can lead themselves."

These lines are more than mantras, they operationalise reappraisal and self-regulation, both core mechanisms of effective emotion control (Gross; Nolen-Hoeksema et al.).

Micro self-compassion exercise (60–90 seconds)

  • Name it: "This is a moment of pain/jealousy."
  • Common humanity: "Many people feel this after a breakup, I am not alone."
  • Kindness: Place a hand on chest or neck and say quietly: "I’ve got me. One step at a time." Short, evidence-aligned, calming for stress and shame (Neff).

What to avoid at all costs

  • Intimate chats or advances under alcohol
  • Passive aggression, digs, insider jokes from your relationship
  • "We must sort this now" - never at a work function
  • Recruiting colleagues to take sides
  • Social media stories with jabs or hidden messages

No-go: jealousy as a tactic. Manipulation undermines trust, increases defensiveness and damages your professional standing - and you.

If you relapse after the event

Relapse means: texting the ex, social media stalking, crying in the bathroom, ruminating till 3 am. It happens, you are human.

  • Stop the guilt spiral. Use meta perspective: "I reacted to a strong trigger with an old pattern. From today I adjust."
  • Concrete plan: 48 hours off social media, move your body, prioritise sleep, quick check-in message to a trusted person (not the ex).
  • Learn from it: What was the tipping point? What did you need? Next time plan an earlier exit or an extra anchor person.

"Get back together" - can a work function help?

A single night rarely brings a relationship back. What it can do:

  • Offer a first impression of stability, respect and emotional maturity
  • Check whether minimal warmth exists on both sides
  • Gently correct past negative impressions

What it should not do:

  • Try to resolve deep conflicts
  • Ultimatums, confessions or love negotiations

If you are open in principle: signal secure attachment (consistency, empathy, boundaries) rather than apply pressure. Research on attachment and trust shows that safety attracts, unpredictability damages relationships (Hazan & Shaver; Johnson; Gottman).

Clothing, body language, voice: subtle signals of safety

  • Clothing: Authentic, neat, functional. Aim for competence over glamour.
  • Body language: Open shoulders, calm hands, feet grounded. No oversized gestures, no instant over-leaning.
  • Voice: Speak a touch slower, finish your sentences, allow pauses. You regulate yourself, and the situation.

Digital hygiene before and after

  • Before: Mute notifications from your ex, archive rather than delete to reduce impulse.
  • During: No stories about closeness/distance. No live commentary about your ex’s reactions.
  • After: No DMs to the ex for 72 hours. No debriefs in the team chat. Journal privately instead.

Why small steps matter

  • Recovery after breakup comes in waves. Fluctuations are normal (Sbarra & Emery). Small, controlled exposures can help build new, safer schemas if you protect yourself.
  • Social rejection shares brain networks with physical pain (Kross). Breath, attentional control and reappraisal reduce subjective pain.
  • Attachment needs remain active after a breakup (Fraley & Shaver). You can soothe them by giving yourself secure signals: predictability, self-care, clear boundaries.

Your personal event compass to print

  • My goal: …
  • My 3 scripts: …
  • My anchor person/people: …
  • My exit time: …
  • My self-care the next day: …

Fill this in beforehand. That way you do not have to improvise at crunch time.

Common thinking traps - and how to correct them

  • Mind reading: "He ignored me, he hates me." Correction: allow ambiguity, gather data, do not interpret.
  • Catastrophising: "This night ruins everything." Correction: single events are rarely final, focus on your next good step.
  • Personalising: "She laughed, against me." Correction: people act from their own states, not against you.

If your ex actively seeks closeness

  • Test intent and sobriety: "Let’s discuss that another time, and sober."
  • Stick to your timeline: no deep talks after 10 pm, no chat in the taxi, no room chats.
  • If the initiative stays respectful and sober: consider a short daytime walk days later, no expectations.

If you’d rather skip it: can you opt out of the work function?

  • Professionally fine if you have sound reasons and it does not breach clear obligations.
  • Psychologically fine if relapse risk is high. Self-protection is legitimate.
  • Communicate professionally, not personally. Do not cite breakup reasons.

Checklist: last-minute before you go

  • Water bottle, gum, tissue with a calming scent
  • Note with goal, scripts, exit time
  • Contact of a trusted, uninvolved person
  • Comfortable, secure shoes (more control, fewer mishaps)

Advanced: shaping micro encounters (reconnection without pressure)

  • 1–2 brief positive interactions, never longer than 2 minutes
  • Shared, neutral humour (for example, the weather, the venue)
  • Visible contribution and kindness to everyone, no selective glow only for the ex
  • No follow up the same night. If it was good, let it be good without capitalising.

The day after: stabilise, do not over-interpret

  • Keep a log: what is fact, what is interpretation?
  • Body work: walk, light training, stretch
  • Social hygiene: 1–2 contacts with people outside work
  • Media hygiene: no photo rewinds, no mood-music loops

Decision tree: follow-up after 72 hours

  • If your goal is distance: no follow-up. Only factual work notes if needed.
  • If your goal is to test reconnection AND the night was consistently respectful AND there were 1–2 warm, low-key interactions: optional short, neutral message with a work link ("Thanks for the organising/input on X, that helped.") No question mark, no proposal.
  • If there were irritations, uncertainty or alcohol in the mix: no follow-up. Stabilise, 2–3 weeks of quiet, then possibly a factual work contact.

Mini pitfalls in detail - and counters

  • "Just a quick chat" in the dark or off to the side: increase visibility, stay in the group area.
  • "Shared ride home": set up your own ride in advance.
  • "They have been drinking and are emotional": friendly, firm boundaries, never relationship talks under the influence.

Core principles to take away

  • Safety over intensity
  • Consistency over brilliance
  • Respect over being right
  • Action over rumination

These principles align with research on trust, attachment and regulation: reliability and self-leadership are more attractive and healthier than short-term fireworks.

If the breakup is very fresh and you feel high relapse risk, skipping is legitimate. Prioritise self-protection and professionalism. If attendance is required, minimise your time there and keep strict boundaries.

Acknowledge the pain, do not react impulsively. Step away briefly, regulate, focus on a task. No jabs, no comparisons. Long term you win with calm.

It can build trust through small, safe signals, but it does not replace real conversations. Use it at most to test mature, respectful coexistence. No pressure, no tactics.

Best is alcohol-free or at most one drink. Alcohol increases impulsivity and makes relationship mistakes more likely.

Protect boundaries: stop calmly ("Not here, please"), involve a neutral person, leave the situation. Inform HR later if needed. Document incidents factually.

"Thanks for caring, I keep private matters outside work." Keep it short, friendly, consistent.

Allow the feeling, find a private spot (toilet, fresh air). Then wash your face, breathe, do a clear action (get water, take on a task).

Usually no, leave 48–72 hours of space. If a work-related follow-up is necessary, keep it brief and neutral.

Sit near neutral people. Avoid direct line of sight to your ex. Keep exits open.

Delay: "Not tonight. If needed, we can chat another time and sober." Hold the boundary.

Bottom line: hope through posture

A work function with your ex is not a night of destiny, it is a training ground for self-leadership. With clear goals, scripts and emotion regulation you turn triggers into tests, and tests into trust in yourself. Whether you need distance or you gently keep a door ajar, your posture is what counts. Secure signals, respect, consistency and a clean ending are always the better choice. And if something goes sideways, you learn, adjust and take the next step. That is the path that heals, and the one that makes real closeness possible, if at all.

What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?

Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic getting back together with your ex is - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.

Scientific Sources

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, E. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Fisher, H. E., Xu, X., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275.

MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223.

Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213–232.

Sbarra, D. A. (2006). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 298–312.

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2009). Breakup distress in university students. Adolescence, 44(176), 705–727.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221–233.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed.). Brunner-Routledge.

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402.

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424.

Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separation contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1198–1212.

Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.

Denson, T. F., Moulds, M. L., & Grisham, J. R. (2012). The effects of rumination on anger and aggressive behavior: An experience-sampling study. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(4), 631–639.

Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.

Eddy, B. (2014). BIFF: Quick responses to high-conflict people. HCI Press.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.

Oettingen, G. (2014). Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation. Current.

Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation. W. W. Norton.