Company outing with your ex: how to handle it

Company outing with your ex? Use science-backed scripts, boundaries and emotion tools to stay professional, avoid pitfalls and handle the night with confidence.

18 min. read Attachment & Psychology

Why you should read this article

A company outing is often a social challenge even without a breakup. When your ex is there, triggers, memories and group pressure can quickly become a volatile mix. In this guide you get science-backed strategies from attachment and emotion research, neuropsychology and relationship science. You will learn how to prepare, how to stay composed in tricky moments, how to set boundaries, and how to shape the night so it serves you long term, whether you need distance or want to carefully test if reconnection is realistic.

The context: Why a company outing with an ex is different

A company outing blends private emotions with a public stage. You are not one-on-one, you are in a social microcosm with managers, colleagues, team tasks, alcohol, group photos and maybe an overnight stay. This mix increases: (1) the likelihood of triggers, (2) the risk of impulsive behaviour, (3) the importance of impression management. There are opportunities too: you can show emotional stability, communicate as equals and demonstrate social competence, all of which signal safety and increase attractiveness according to attachment research.

Important: a company outing is not therapy or a reconciliation stage. It is first and foremost a work event with a clear priority: professionalism and teamwork. That frame protects you, and it also requires strategic behaviour so you do not fall back into old patterns.

The science: What happens in you during a "company outing with an ex"

Several research streams explain why encounters with an ex feel so intense:

  • Attachment system: Following Bowlby and Ainsworth, people respond to separation with a "bonding alarm". Depending on attachment style (secure, anxious, avoidant) you tend to cling, ruminate or distance. At work, these patterns can be amplified by social evaluation (Hazan & Shaver; Mikulincer & Shaver).
  • Neurochemistry: Romantic rejection activates reward and stress networks similar to addiction and pain systems (Fisher et al.; Kross et al.; MacDonald & Leary). A quick glance, a scent or a voice can trigger dopamine expectations and separation pain at the same time. That explains why a neutral "Hi" can feel like a heavy relapse internally.
  • Social threat: Humans are highly sensitive to rejection. In group settings like a company outing, perceived exclusion can feel especially painful (Kross; Williams). Do not underestimate how strong a short comment or nonverbal cue can be.
  • Negativity bias: Negative impressions weigh more than positive ones (Baumeister et al.). A single "slip" (for example tears in front of others) can distort your self-image, and sometimes the team’s impression. Preparation protects.

What does this mean practically? Your greatest resource is emotion regulation. Strategies like reappraisal, attentional shifting, breathing techniques and planned scripts are effective (Gross). And breakup recovery research shows that controlled exposure, in small, planned doses, can support healing if you behave safely (Sbarra). A company outing is a "natural exposure": use it deliberately instead of reacting.

The neurochemistry of love has addiction-like qualities, a look, a message, a memory can kick the reward system back into gear.

Dr. Helen Fisher , Anthropologist, Kinsey Institute

Core decision: Prioritise distance or test gentle reconnection?

Before you plan, choose a guiding line:

  • Prioritise distance: You want to heal, reduce rumination and stay professional. The goal is low-emotion, clearly bounded behaviour with no room for misinterpretation.
  • Test reconnection: You want to show, carefully and without pressure, that conditions have improved (for example communication, stability) and see if your ex responds with minimal positivity. The goal is not "win them back on demand", it is safe signals.

Both goals require the same basics: stability, respect, boundaries. The difference lies in the dose and direction of contact offers.

If distance is your goal

  • Minimal, polite interaction
  • Clear time and social boundaries
  • Focus on the team, not the ex
  • No private topics, no alcohol excess
  • Aftercare with self-care

If reconnection is your goal

  • Short, warm but non-committal signals
  • No relationship talk, only light, safe topics
  • Show consistency throughout the night
  • Respect every "no" and every withdrawal
  • Aftercare: do not follow up, give space

Preparation: Your pre-event plan

Good preparation reduces spur-of-the-moment mistakes and makes emotion regulation easier.

  • Put your goal into one sentence: "I will stay professional and leave by 10:30 pm." Or: "I show calm safety, make 3 good team contributions and avoid deep conversations."
  • Implementation intentions (if-then plans): If I see my ex, then I say, "Hey, good to see you. Have fun tonight!" and move to person X. If my heart starts racing, then I will exhale 6 breaths longer than I inhale.
  • Social anchors: Arrange to link up with 1 to 2 colleagues who have nothing to do with the breakup. They are your safe harbour in the group flow.
  • Exit strategy: Plan a plausible reason to leave early (morning meeting, early train). Ending early is always better than spiralling late.
  • Define boundaries: No alcohol or at most 1 drink. No debrief about the breakup with colleagues. No private messages to the ex before, during or after the event.
  • Physical priming routine: 5 minutes of brisk walking before the event, 2 minutes of slow exhalation breathing (inhale 4 seconds, exhale 6 to 8 seconds). Movement and breathing dampen stress systems.
  • Clothing: Choose a look that feels authentic, competent and easy to move in. The goal is not "make them jealous", it is "signal safety and self-respect".

Bonus: A WOOP plan for the night

  • Wish: "Stay composed and leave without drama."
  • Outcome: "I feel proud and professional, the team sees me as steady."
  • Obstacle (internal): "Jealousy triggers, rumination, urge to talk."
  • Plan (if-then): "If I feel jealousy, I step outside for 2 minutes of fresh air, then I do a micro task." This mental contrasting plus implementation intentions strengthens goal commitment (Oettingen; Gollwitzer).

Scripts and phrases: What you can say

When you shape your behaviour in advance, you can access it in the moment. Examples:

  • Neutral greeting: "Hi! Good to see you. How are you? Have fun tonight!" Smile, brief eye contact, move on.
  • Small talk in the team: "The view is great. Who is taking the first leg in the kayak?" Shift to activity and group topics.
  • Stop overly personal questions: "Happy to talk privately another time. Tonight I am keeping to work topics." Friendly, firm.
  • Alcohol boundary: "Just water for me tonight, I have an early start."
  • Handling jibes: "Let’s keep it respectful. I do not want to get into this here."
  • Praise and warmth (reconnection, measured): "Thanks for organising, this is really well planned." No private undertone.

Remember: short sentences, clear I-statements, no lengthy justifications. That reduces room for interpretation.

The BIFF formula for tricky messages or questions

If a written or spontaneous tricky question comes up, reply BIFF:

  • Brief: "Thanks for the info."
  • Informative: "I am keeping to work topics tonight."
  • Friendly: "Wishing you a good evening."
  • Firm: "Let’s discuss private matters another time, and sober." This structure reduces escalation and protects your boundary (Eddy).

Real-time emotion regulation: The 4 most effective tools

From emotion research (Gross) and breakup studies (Sbarra, Field) four tools apply to the company outing with an ex:

Attentional shifting
  • Focus on tasks, objects, nature, sounds. Count steps to the fire pit, set up the bowling lane, hold eye contact with teammates instead of the ex.
  • Micro tasking: "I’ll bring 3 glasses to the table now", "I’ll ask 2 colleagues about their project". Action reduces rumination.
Reappraisal
  • Instead of "He is ignoring me, I do not matter": "We are both keeping it professional. That is respect."
  • Instead of "She is laughing with others": "She is relaxing with the team. Good that the environment stays friendly."
Breath and body regulation
  • 6 to 8 calm breaths with longer exhale. Drop your shoulders, release your jaw, feel your feet.
  • Kinetic self soothing: Sip water slowly, rinse hands briefly with cold water, step outside for 30 seconds.
Social regulation
  • Brief check in with a trusted colleague: "I am taking a quick breather, be right back." No breakup details.

These strategies are not cosmetic. They measurably change activity in stress and reward networks and the subjective pain of social rejection (Kross; MacDonald & Leary). A meta analysis shows that adaptive strategies like reappraisal and problem solving are associated with better wellbeing over time (Aldao et al.).

Caution with alcohol: it lowers inhibition and amplifies impulsive attachment reactions. If your inner voice says "Just one more", that is often your cue to leave.

Fine tuning by attachment style

Different attachment patterns benefit from different micro strategies:

  • Anxious ambivalent
    • Do: Set clear plans and times in advance, activate your social anchor, practise self soothing (breath, self compassion).
    • Don't: Subtle bids for reassurance (glances, tests, hints). No "We need to talk" attempts.
    • Phrase: "I can want closeness and still keep distance tonight, to protect myself."
  • Avoidant
    • Do: Measured, polite presence instead of total withdrawal. 1 to 2 short, positive team interactions.
    • Don't: Cold devaluation or ignoring that others could read as hostility.
    • Phrase: "I can hold boundaries without putting others down."
  • Disorganised or mixed insecure
    • Do: Small, predictable steps, clear exit times, zero alcohol.
    • Don't: Sudden swings (seek closeness then push away).
    • Phrase: "Small, consistent actions are safer than intense moments."

This micro adjustment boosts your sense of inner leadership, and that reads as stability to others.

Group dynamics: How to move confidently in the team

  • Positioning: Stand so you are not directly opposite your ex for long. Move naturally, that lets you control sightlines.
  • Activities: Take on small, visible but not dominant tasks (coordinate photos, sort place cards). It shows competence and gives you focus.
  • Humour: Use light, inclusive humour. Avoid insider jokes from your past, they can trigger you or confuse others.
  • Avoid coalitions: Do not ask friends to take sides. It increases group pressure and looks unprofessional.
  • No breakup debriefs: Talking about the breakup at work almost always harms your long term position and privacy, and it undermines trust, including with your ex.

Remote or hybrid events (digital company outings)

  • Camera management: Do not pin your ex’s video, use gallery view.
  • Chat hygiene: No private DMs during the event. Avoid reaction emojis to your ex.
  • Breaks: Plan mini breaks between breakout sessions for breathing and reappraisal.
  • Background: Calm, professional setting, no trigger objects in frame.
  • Early exit remains possible, inform the host briefly.

The delicate moment: When you end up side by side

These mini islands happen often at company outings, by the buffet, on the way to an activity, by the campfire.

  • Keep the window short (30 to 90 seconds).
  • Choose neutral topics: "How did your sprint review go?", "That team challenge was fun."
  • Watch the signals: if your ex is brief, respect that immediately. If they respond warmly, do not automatically extend, stick to your planned dose.
  • Take the lead in closing: "I’m grabbing some water. Catch you later!" You steer the situation.

If you are testing reconnection, the art is dosage. Secure signals are warmth, consistency, respect for boundaries and self regulation, not drama, jealousy or pressure (Gottman; Johnson).

Trigger management: scents, music, photos, insider places

Breakup and attachment research show that sensory cues strongly link to memories.

  • Scent: If perfume or aftershave triggers you, discreetly carry a calming scent of your own (for example a drop of essential oil on a tissue).
  • Music: Ask the organisers in advance for a playlist that avoids your songs if possible. Or use short music breaks with headphones during pauses.
  • Photos: When group photos happen, aim for neutrality. Do not stand right next to your ex, but do not step away dramatically either. Later, avoid narrative-making.
  • Insider places: If the location brings back memories, breathe, label it internally as "memory", then shift your gaze to new details (colour, sounds). That is reappraisal in real time.

If your ex mentions new dates or flirts

Jealousy is normal but risky. Research shows social rejection hurts and easily leads to hostile interpretations (Williams; MacDonald & Leary).

  • Immediate steps: Break eye contact, lengthen your exhale, focus on a task. No sarcastic jabs, no comparisons.
  • Inner line: "This hurts, and I will stay true to myself." Acknowledge the emotion, avoid reactive behaviour.
  • Behaviour: Stay neutral, keep distance. If needed, step away for a few minutes.

Reconnection scenario? Flirting with others is not a green light. If someone is serious about a fresh start, they signal respect. Your best response is maturity, which is, paradoxically, the most attractive.

HR and safety: When you must protect your boundaries

  • Confidentiality: Do not discuss relationship details. It protects you and your professional image.
  • Overstepping: Be clear, "I do not want to talk about that here." If boundaries are ignored, calmly involve a neutral person or inform HR later.
  • Alcohol and consent: No private advances under the influence. Professionalism first. It protects everyone.
  • Overnights: If the event includes an overnight stay, sort out rooming, seating and shuttles in advance. Clarity prevents misunderstandings.

If you are a people manager, double responsibility

  • Role model: Model boundaries (no whispering in confidence, no alcohol excess).
  • Equal treatment: No visible special attention or coldness towards the ex.
  • No performance talks: No feedback or career conversations that night.
  • Conflict prevention: Plan seating, team mix and tasks to reduce tension.
  • Documentation: If incidents occur, document them promptly and factually and pass to HR or your employee rep, without value judgements.

Mini opportunities for trust signals, without pressure

If you are testing reconnection, focus on five safe micro behaviours:

  • Consistent calm throughout the evening (no mood swings)
  • Prosocial actions with no hidden agenda (offer a seat, help out)
  • Respectful distance: you do not chase closeness, you do not refuse it either
  • No sensitive topics, no rehashing the past
  • Clean ending: friendly goodbye with no "We need to talk" anchor

Gottman’s research suggests that stable, positive micro interactions build trust. The company outing can be a stage for this, but only if you control the dose.

5:1

Positives/Negatives, the rule of thumb for stable impressions (Gottman). Aim for more positive than tricky micro moments.

10 breaths

That many deliberate breaths often help you steady yourself before you speak.

30 days

Plan a low contact phase after the event to consolidate, especially if it was emotional.

Timeline: Before, during and after

Preparation

48-72 hours before

  • Define your goal, write scripts, choose clothing
  • Inform your social anchor, set your exit plan
  • Stabilise sleep and nutrition, avoid alcohol
Arrival

First 15 minutes

  • Greet with a smile, neutral small talk
  • Scan the room: seat, exits, anchor person
  • Take on 1 to 2 micro tasks
Middle

During the activities

  • Focus on team outcomes, steer eye contact
  • Breathing breaks, short walks, drink water
  • Do not open private or historical topics
Late evening

When tiredness or alcohol kicks in

  • Clear line: no sensitive conversations, no relationship talk
  • Early, friendly exit if tension rises
Aftercare

24-72 hours after

  • Journal: what worked, what triggered
  • Do not "check in" with the ex, focus on self care
  • Consider a therapy or coaching session

Concrete scenarios and solutions

  • Cheryl, 34, Marketing: Fresh breakup (3 weeks). At the company BBQ her ex stands opposite and loudly praises the steak they used to cook together. Solution: Cheryl smiles, says "Good taste always wins" and pivots to "Who wants more salad?" Later she takes a 5 minute walk. Result: no escalation, inner pride.
  • Aaron, 41, IT: He wants distance, but the ex seeks closeness and asks, "Why don’t you text me anymore?" Solution: Aaron replies calmly, "I want to respect both sides and keep private matters out of tonight." Then he asks colleague A about the next game.
  • Priya, 29, HR: She wants to gently test reconnection. At bowling her ex sits beside her. Solution: Priya brings a neutral, positive topic ("Your team pulled off the cloud migration well, congrats"), stays 2 minutes, then changes seats. Later a friendly goodbye, no follow up.
  • Wei Jie, 38, Sales: The ex flirts with others. Jealousy rises. Solution: Wei Jie steps out briefly, drinks water, internally repeats "Accept, breathe, act". He volunteers to facilitate the next round, action focus instead of reactivity.
  • Siti, 33, Product: The group pushes for a "funny ex-couple photo". Solution: Siti laughs lightly, says "Team only tonight" and proposes an alternative group photo. Humour plus boundary.
  • Kelvin, 46, Operations: The ex starts talking about the breakup in a small circle. Solution: Kelvin says calmly, "I do not want to discuss that here. Thanks for understanding." He moves to colleagues who are discussing the new ERP.
  • Mei Ling, 27, Customer Success: Overnight event. Her room is next to the ex. Solution: She asks the organisers early for a swap ("I sleep better at the end of the corridor."). Prevention over escalation.
  • Nadia, 32, Design: Near the end a message from the ex arrives: "Want to talk quickly?" Solution: Nadia checks her goal card. She replies, "Not tonight, thanks. Let’s keep the evening professional." Then she leaves on time.

Inner work: self talk that works

  • "I am allowed to be hurt, and I will act professionally."
  • "Their behaviour says nothing about my worth, only about their current state."
  • "My goal is calm, not victory."
  • "Attractive is the person who can lead themselves."

These lines are more than mantras, they operationalise reappraisal and self regulation, both core mechanisms of effective emotion control (Gross; Nolen-Hoeksema et al.).

Micro exercise in self compassion (60 to 90 seconds)

  • Label: "This is a moment of pain or jealousy."
  • Common humanity: "Many people feel this after a breakup, I am not alone."
  • Kindness: Place a hand on chest or neck and quietly say, "I am here for me. One step at a time." Short, evidence-based and regulating for stress and shame (Neff).

What to avoid at all costs

  • Advances or intimate talks under alcohol
  • Passive aggression, jibes, insider jokes from your relationship
  • "We must sort this now", never at a company outing
  • Coalitions with colleagues against the ex
  • Social media stories with digs or hidden messages

No go: jealousy as a "tactic". Manipulation undermines trust, increases defensiveness and harms your professional standing, and you.

If you "relapse" after the event

Relapse means: messaging the ex, social media stalking, crying in the bathroom, ruminating until 3 am. It happens, you are human.

  • Stop the guilt spiral. Use a meta perspective: "I responded to a strong trigger with an old pattern. From today I adjust."
  • Concrete plan: 48 hours of social media pause, move your body, prioritise sleep, a short check in to a trusted person (not the ex).
  • Learn from it: what was the tipping point, what would you have needed. Next time plan an earlier exit or an extra anchor person.

"Win the ex back" via a company outing?

One night rarely brings a relationship back. It can deliver:

  • A first impression of stability, respect and emotional maturity
  • A check on whether minimal warmth exists both ways
  • A small correction of earlier negative impressions

It should not attempt:

  • Resolving deep conflicts
  • Ultimatums, confessions, "love negotiations"

If you are open in principle, prioritise secure bonding signals (consistency, empathy, boundaries) over pressure. Research on attachment and trust shows: safety is attractive, unpredictability is risky (Hazan & Shaver; Johnson; Gottman).

Clothing, body language, voice: subtle safety signals

  • Clothing: authentic, neat, functional. Aim for competence over glamour.
  • Body language: open shoulders, calm hands, feet grounded. No oversized gestures, no forced "instant warmth".
  • Voice: speak a little slower, finish sentences, allow pauses. You regulate yourself and the situation.

Digital hygiene before and after

  • Before: mute notifications from the ex, archive rather than delete to reduce impulses.
  • During: do not post stories about closeness or distance. No live commentary about the ex’s reactions.
  • After: 72 hours with no DM to the ex. No debriefs in the team chat. Instead, document in your journal.

Quick science notes: why small steps matter

  • Breakup recovery comes in waves. Fluctuations are normal (Sbarra & Emery). Small, controlled exposures can help form new, safer schemas if you protect yourself.
  • Social rejection shares brain networks with physical pain (Kross). Breathing, attentional shifting and reappraisal reduce the subjective pain.
  • Attachment needs remain active after a breakup (Fraley & Shaver). You can calm them by giving yourself secure signals: predictability, self care, clear boundaries.

Your personal event compass to print

  • My goal: …
  • My 3 scripts: …
  • My anchor person(s): …
  • My exit time: …
  • My self care the next day: …

Fill this in beforehand. That way you do not have to improvise at the crucial moment.

Common thinking traps and corrections

  • Mind reading: "He ignored me, he hates me." Correction: accept ambiguity, collect data, avoid interpreting.
  • Catastrophising: "This night will ruin everything." Correction: single events are rarely final, focus on the next good step.
  • Personalising: "She laughed, against me." Correction: people act mostly from their own states, not against you.

If your ex actively seeks closeness

  • Test intent and sobriety: "Let’s discuss this at another time, sober and in peace."
  • Stick to your timeline: no deep talks after 10 pm, no taxi talk, no hotel room talk.
  • If the initiative stays respectful and sober: schedule, days later if needed, a short daytime walk without expectations.

Prefer to skip? Can you say no to the company outing?

  • Professionally okay if you have good reasons and no mandatory attendance.
  • Psychologically okay if relapse risk is high. Self protection is legitimate.
  • Communicate professionally, not privately. Do not mention breakup reasons.

Last minute checklist before you go

  • Water bottle, gum, tissue with calming scent
  • Note with goal, scripts, exit time
  • Contact of a trusted, uninvolved person
  • Comfortable, stable shoes (more control, fewer mishaps)

For advanced users: shaping micro encounters (gentle reconnection)

  • 1 to 2 short, positive interactions, never longer than 2 minutes
  • Shared, neutral humour (for example about the weather or location)
  • Visible help and kindness towards everyone, not a selective glow only for the ex
  • No same night follow up. If it was good, let it stand without "capitalising" it.

The day after: stabilise rather than interpret

  • Keep notes: what is fact, what is interpretation
  • Body work: walk, light training, stretch
  • Social hygiene: 1 to 2 contacts with people outside work
  • Media hygiene: no photo rewinds, no mood music loop

Decision tree: follow up after 72 hours

  • If your goal is distance: no follow up. Only factual work notes if needed.
  • If your goal is to test reconnection AND the night was consistently respectful AND there were 1 to 2 warm, low key interactions: optionally send a short, neutral work-related note ("Thanks for the organising or the input on X, it helped.") with no question mark and no suggestion.
  • If there was friction, uncertainty or alcohol in play: no follow up. Stabilise, 2 to 3 weeks of quiet, then, if needed, factual contact in a work context.

Common pitfalls in detail, and counter moves

  • "Just a quick chat" in the dark or off to the side: increase visibility, stay in group areas.
  • "Shared ride home": pre arrange your own transport.
  • "They drank and got emotional": set boundaries kindly and clearly, never relationship talks under the influence.

Core principles to take away

  • Safety before intensity
  • Consistency before brilliance
  • Respect before being right
  • Action before rumination

These principles align with research on trust, attachment and regulation: reliability and self leadership are more attractive and healthier than short term effects.

If the breakup is very recent and you feel a high risk of relapse, skipping is legitimate. Prioritise self protection and professionalism. If attendance is required, minimise your time there and hold firm boundaries.

Acknowledge the pain but do not act impulsively. Step away briefly, regulate, focus on a task. No digs, no comparisons. Long term you win through calm.

It can build trust through small, safe signals, but it does not replace proper conversations. Use it at most as a test for mature, respectful coexistence. No pressure, no tactics.

Best is alcohol free or at most one drink. Alcohol raises impulsivity and makes relationship mistakes more likely.

Protect boundaries: stop calmly ("Not here, please"), bring in a neutral person, leave the situation. Inform HR later if needed. Document events factually.

"Thanks for the concern, but I keep private matters outside work." Keep it short, friendly, consistent.

Allow the feeling, find a private space (restroom, fresh air). Then wash your face, breathe, take a clear action (get water, take a task).

Generally no, give at least 48 to 72 hours of space. If a work-related follow up is necessary, keep it brief and neutral.

Sit near neutral people. Avoid direct line of sight to your ex. Keep exits open.

Postpone: "Not tonight. If needed, we can talk another time, sober and in peace." Hold the boundary.

Conclusion: Hope through posture

A company outing with an ex is not a night of destiny, it is a training ground for self leadership. With clear goals, scripts and emotion regulation, you turn triggers into tests, and tests into trust in yourself. Whether you need distance or you are gently keeping a door open, your posture decides. Safe signals, respect, consistency and a clean ending are always the better choice. And if something goes wrong, you learn, adjust and take the next step. That is the path that heals, and the only one that can make real closeness possible again.

What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?

Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic it is to reconcile with your ex-partner - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.

Scientific Sources

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, E. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Fisher, H. E., Xu, X., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275.

MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223.

Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213–232.

Sbarra, D. A. (2006). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 298–312.

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2009). Breakup distress in university students. Adolescence, 44(176), 705–727.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221–233.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed.). Brunner-Routledge.

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402.

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424.

Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separation contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1198–1212.

Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452.

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612.

Denson, T. F., Moulds, M. L., & Grisham, J. R. (2012). The effects of rumination on anger and aggressive behavior: An experience-sampling study. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(4), 631–639.

Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.

Eddy, B. (2014). BIFF: Quick responses to high-conflict people. HCI Press.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.

Oettingen, G. (2014). Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation. Current.

Neff, K. D. (2003). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85–101.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation. W. W. Norton.