Ex Changed Profile Picture: Meaning

Ex changed profile picture? Learn what it can signal after a breakup and how to respond. Science-based tips to stay calm, protect healing, and keep options open.

18 min. read Attachment & Psychology

Why you should read this

When your ex changes their profile picture, it can feel like a code you have to crack. "Is this a sign?" "Should I respond?" That uncertainty drains energy and hijacks your focus. In this article you get a clear, science-based orientation: what these updates can mean psychologically, what research shows about post-breakup patterns on social media, and how to make smart, composed choices, whether you want to heal or keep the door open for reconnection. We connect attachment theory, neurobiology, and breakup research to concrete action plans for your daily life.

Scientific background: Why a profile picture hits so hard

When your ex changes their profile picture, more is happening in your brain than you might like. Several research lines explain why this tiny pixel shift can move you so much.

  • Attachment system: Following Bowlby and Ainsworth, your attachment system reacts strongly to cues that signal closeness or distance. A new photo can be read as a distance marker, your inner alarm turns on.
  • Neurochemistry: Heartbreak activates reward and pain networks. fMRI studies show that rejection triggers brain areas similar to those involved in physical pain. A profile photo can feel like a mini rejection or a flicker of hope and can swing dopamine and cortisol.
  • Social signals: On social media we present a curated identity. After breakups people often intensify self-presentation to reclaim identity and signal status. The profile picture is the most prominent calling card.
  • Monitoring and rumination: Studies show that watching an ex on social media can prolong processing and raise jealousy. A new picture feeds interpretation loops.

Short version: A new profile picture is not neutral. It triggers attachment needs, meaning-making, and neurochemical waves. That is why it feels bigger than it is, and why smart strategies help.

The neurochemistry of love is comparable to a drug addiction. Withdrawal after a breakup is real.

Dr. Helen Fisher , Anthropologist, Kinsey Institute

What profile updates can mean after a breakup

Before we talk strategy, it helps to map possible meanings. Important: Any behavior can have more than one motive, and you only see the surface. Do not confuse possible with certain.

Identity reset
  • Meaning: "I am myself again." After relationships, people often switch to photos that highlight old hobbies, friend groups, or solo shots. Identity work is a normal step in healing.
  • Psychology: Self-concept reorganization, distancing from the "we" identity.
  • Signs: New styling, old hobbies, solo travel photos.
Mood regulation or performative positivity
  • Meaning: "I am fine, really!" Sometimes it is self-soothing, sometimes a signal.
  • Psychology: Emotion regulation through social validation. Likes act like small dopamine boosts.
  • Signs: Super cheerful pictures, quotes about freedom, fitness or success posts.
Romantic signaling or rebound
  • Meaning: Interest in something new or a rebound, sometimes used as an jealousy trigger.
  • Psychology: Substitute bonding and distancing, sometimes protest behavior in anxious attachment.
  • Signs: Party or dating vibes, photos with potentially romantic subtext.
Social status and self-worth
  • Meaning: Emphasizing attractiveness and social embedding.
  • Psychology: Impression management, comparison pressure.
  • Signs: Pro photos, lifestyle, success symbols.
Avoiding communication
  • Meaning: No statement. A neutral picture can be routine, a platform reminder, or seasonal change.
  • Psychology: Low investment, low symbolism.
  • Signs: Landscape, avatar, logo.
Provocation or boundary test
  • Meaning: Testing whether you still react.
  • Psychology: Protest behavior, search for control.
  • Signs: Spikes after silence, subtle jabs, innuendo.
Grief and processing
  • Meaning: Expression of loss.
  • Psychology: Grief rituals, self-disclosure.
  • Signs: Reflective photos, black and white, quotes about letting go.

Important: The platform shapes how you read it. A WhatsApp profile picture can feel more directed at you, you are definitely in the audience. An Instagram profile serves a broader audience.

Important: A profile picture is a silent cue, not proof. You see 1% of the context. Treat your hypotheses as hypotheses, not facts.

Attachment styles and social media reactions

Attachment research helps explain why people change profiles, and why you perceive it so intensely.

Secure

  • After the breakup: Moderate social media activity, consistent identity, rarely provocative.
  • Profile changes: Functional or growth-oriented ("new chapter"), few hidden messages.
  • Your best response: Stay calm, set clear contact rules, focus on your goals.

Anxious

  • Behavior: Higher posting frequency, feedback seeking, strong reactivity.
  • Profile changes: Jealousy triggers, performative happiness, indirect messages.
  • Your best response: Do not reinforce with likes or comments, set boundaries, self-soothe.

Avoidant

  • Behavior: Withdrawal, emphasis on autonomy, distant presentation.
  • Profile changes: Cool, matter-of-fact photos, "I do not care" signals.
  • Your best response: Do not chase, respect distance, communicate authentically and sparingly.

Disorganized or fearful-avoidant

  • Behavior: Switching between closeness and distance, unpredictable.
  • Profile changes: Inconsistent, contradictory signals.
  • Your best response: Be the stable one, do not react impulsively.

Post-breakup phases: What social media amplifies

Phase 1

Acute shock (0-4 weeks)

  • High stalking risk, rumination, physical stress. Profile changes feel like pinpricks. Risk: over-interpretation.
Phase 2

Reorganization (1-3 months)

  • Identity work: New styling, hobbies, friend circles. Profile photos emphasize independence and new chapters.
Phase 3

Stabilization (3-6 months)

  • Emotional distance grows. Profile updates become rarer and more functional. Communication can be more neutral.
Phase 4

Integration (6-12+ months)

  • The breakup is embedded in your story. Social media signals trigger less reactivity. Real chances for rebuilding are easier to assess.

Cognitive biases: The biggest thinking traps

  • Mind reading: You think you know what your ex means with the photo. Reality: You do not know their context or intention.
  • Confirmation bias: You search for evidence that supports your hopes or fears.
  • Catastrophizing: One photo becomes a doomsday scenario.
  • Emotional reasoning: "Because it feels bad, it must mean something bad."
  • Availability bias: You remember the posts that triggered you the most.

Strategy: Label it ("ah, that is my mind reading"), breathe, follow the 72-hour rule, then act.

Practical strategies: What to do now

Pause reactivity
  • 72-hour rule: No reaction for the first three days. Neurochemical waves settle in that time.
  • Urge surfing: When the urge to stalk or text comes up, set a 10-minute timer. Observe the wave without acting.
Social media hygiene
  • Mute or silence: Reduces triggers without dramatic signals like blocking.
  • App folders or time limits: Put social apps in a Later folder, enable app limits.
  • Log triggers: Keep a trigger list. What sets me off, what helps me.
Communication guide
  • Rule of thumb: Do not respond to a profile photo change.
  • Exception: Ongoing practical communication, for example co-parenting. Even then, do not mention the photo.
  • Text examples:
    • Wrong: "Nice new pic. Are you seeing someone?"
    • Right: "Drop-off Friday at 6 pm as agreed."
Your own posts: Intention over reaction
  • No jealousy plays. No passive-aggressive quotes.
  • Post based on values: health, friends, projects. Not too often, not aimed at one person.
Decision tree: What is your path?
  • Want to heal first? -> Mute, no reactions for 30 days, focus on routines, workouts, sleep, social support.
  • Want to keep long-term chances? -> De-escalate emotions, show stability, signal growth indirectly (no show), only after you are steady send a neutral, useful touchpoint, for example "I found an article that could help with your work." Do this no earlier than several weeks later.
Track progress
  • Journal: Trigger - thought - feeling - action - outcome.
  • Micro wins: 24 hours without checking, 72 hours without viewing stories, reward yourself in a healthy way.

72 hours

The best minimum to prevent impulsive reactions to social media triggers.

30 days

A realistic window for no contact or low contact to cut reactivity dramatically.

1-3 months

Typical time for triggers to drop significantly if you follow hygiene rules.

Real-life scenarios

  1. Sarah, 34, co-parenting, WhatsApp trigger Sarah sees her ex switch to a gym selfie on WhatsApp. First thought: "He is dating." Impulse: Ask whether their daughter will meet the new person. Strategy: 72-hour rule, then only practical co-parenting messages. Result after 2 weeks: Less urge to stalk, calmer handoffs.
  2. Daniel, 29, on-off relationship, Instagram signal His ex posts a glowing travel shot. Daniel feels replaced. He wants to post a cooler photo. Intervention: No competitive posting. Instead, workout, meet friends, put the phone away. After 10 days the ex writes casually. Daniel replies friendly and brief. The dynamic de-escalates.
  3. Leyla, 41, avoidant ex Ex switches to a landscape photo. Leyla reads it as "He is done." Therapeutic reframing: Landscape equals neutral. She stops interpreting, focuses on work and sleep. After 4 weeks her urge to check stories drops by 70%.
  4. Jonas, 33, jealousy test Ex posts a picture with a stranger in the background. Jonas wants to text. Coach advice: Do not react, wait 72 hours, then ask yourself: "Would I send this if I knew it was random?" Answer: No. He does not write and feels grateful 3 days later.
  5. Mia, 27, serious reconnection Mia wants to try again eventually. Ex switches to a business headshot. Mia spends 6 weeks on sleep, exercise, and friends, then sends a neutral check-in linked to a topic he cares about professionally. No mention of the photo. The chat is easy, they agree on coffee. Key: No rush, no photo comments, values first.

Platform-specific notes

  • WhatsApp: Audience is tighter. An update can feel more directed at you. Many updates are routine.
  • Instagram: Bigger public stage. The profile photo is shallow, stories are fleeting and often impulsive. Avoid over-reading stories.
  • Facebook: Profile photo changes are rarer and often come with comments. Do not escalate in comment sections.
  • LinkedIn: Work context. Do not read love signals into a new business photo.

Visibility and privacy: What your ex likely sees, and what they do not

  • Story views: On Instagram or WhatsApp, viewers can be visible. Frequent viewing creates patterns. Solution: Mute, avoid anonymous tools that fuel obsession.
  • Profile photo visibility: WhatsApp settings (Nobody, My contacts, Everyone) determine if you should even see the photo. Ask yourself: Does this belong in my daily life?
  • Mutual friends: Shared visibility increases misinterpretations. Strategy: No detective work through likes.
  • Algorithm: The more you look, the more the platform serves similar content. Do not take the algorithm personally, it is a mirror of your clicks, not their feelings.

30-day reset program against social media triggers

  • Week 1: Acute calming
    • Mute all relevant accounts.
    • Enforce the 72-hour rule strictly.
    • Daily 20-30 minutes of movement, 10-minute reset after each trigger.
  • Week 2: Structure and values
    • Create a values board, 3 core values, for example calm, respect, growth.
    • Post only by plan, 2-3 posts per week max, no reactive posts.
    • Social apps only in two fixed 15-minute windows.
  • Week 3: Contact clarity
    • Decide: No contact or low contact (practical only). Write your rules down.
    • Practice text templates for boundaries and practical communication.
    • One check-in with a trusted person after triggers, call instead of text.
  • Week 4: Review and adjust
    • Review: What helped, what triggers remain?
    • Optional: Extend no or low contact for another 30 days.
    • If you consider reconnecting later: Only when emotionally steady, start neutral micro interactions, no mentions of the photo.

Message templates and scripts for tricky moments

  • Practical co-parenting: "Daycare pickup tomorrow 4:30 pm. I will bring the sports gear."
  • Set a boundary, no drama: "For my stability I am on social media less. Logistics by text or email works best."
  • No reaction to photo, stay polite: "Thanks for the apartment info. I will send the meter reading tomorrow."
  • Re-engagement later, neutral, useful: "You once asked about X, here is the link or contact. Happy to share."
  • Decline an invite kindly: "I have a lot on my plate, keeping social media quiet. Thank you and have a good week."
  • If your ex comments on your photo: "Thank you. Hope you are well." Short, friendly, not flirty.

Different starting points: Left vs. leaver

  • If you were left:
    • Higher trigger risk. Priority: seatbelt, mute, 72-hour rule, support network.
    • Avoid searching for meaning in symbols. Stability before meaning.
  • If you ended it:
    • Guilt can lead to overcompensation, likes, comments, stay friendly. That sends mixed signals.
    • Clarity is fair: Do not maintain the tie through social media. If needed, agree on low contact explicitly.

Holidays, birthdays, anniversaries: Protocol for sensitive times

  • Plan ahead: Decide 48 hours before how you will use social media, or not. Tell 1-2 friends as your safety net.
  • Message yes or no? Only if it fits your current contact pattern and is not triggered by a photo. If yes, keep it short, friendly, not nostalgic.
  • Aftercare: After the occasion, do 30 minutes offline, walk, warm shower, journal.

Blocking, unblocking, removing: What it really means

  • Blocking can be self-protection, not a power move. If mute is not enough, block quietly without announcement.
  • Unblocking is not an invitation. It is a technical setting, no obligation to interact.
  • Removing contacts from your phone reduces impulsive messages. Pair with an emergency list, two people you call instead of your ex.

Self-test: Social media dependence after the breakup

Rate 0-3 (0 never, 3 often) for the past 7 days:

  1. I checked their profile multiple times a day.
  2. My sleep suffered because I scrolled at night.
  3. I posted content indirectly aimed at them.
  4. I felt worse after looking.
  5. I used friends as informants.
  6. I wanted to create fake accounts.
  7. I neglected work or school because of scrolling.
  8. A new photo ruined my day.
  9. I overinterpreted comments or stories.
  10. I texted impulsively and regretted it.

Scoring: 0-7 low, 8-15 medium, try 14-30 days of detox, 16+ high, go for strict no contact and consider professional support.

Advanced: A three-stage contact roadmap (if you want to keep chances)

  • Phase A: Decoupling (4-6 weeks)
    • Goal: Emotional discharge. Only practical topics, otherwise radio silence. No social media references.
  • Phase B: Neutral re-engagement (2-3 short touchpoints)
    • Format: Useful, appreciative, not intimate messages, for example a link to their interest area.
    • Cadence: Max 1 message every 10-14 days. No ping-pong.
  • Phase C: Light offline meetup
    • Frame: Short coffee or walk, clear timing, 45-60 minutes. No breakup debrief, no social media talk.
    • Goal: An impression of calm, maturity, and real change, lived not performed.

Gatekeeper questions before each step:

  • Am I calm even if there is no reply?
  • Would I do the same if social media did not exist?
  • Does this align with my three core values?

Safety and ethics

  • Do not guess passwords, do not log into their accounts, do not track devices. This is legally risky and psychologically harmful.
  • If you feel pulled toward online control, distance, block or detox. That is responsible to you and the other person.
  • If there are signs of control, threats, or abuse: safety first. Document incidents, lean on trusted people and local resources.

Measurable progress: Signs you are getting better

  • Longer delay between trigger and action, for example from 2 to 30 minutes.
  • Fewer social comparisons per day.
  • Better sleep and screen time down 30% in 2 weeks.
  • Your feed reflects your interests again, not your ex.

Common missteps, and what to do instead

  • Commenting under the new photo: Adds drama. Alternative: Silence.
  • Competitive posting: Looks transparent. Alternative: Post by your plan, not by reaction.
  • Vague quotes, "Some people...": Escalates. Alternative: Journal, call a friend.
  • Using friends as spies: Keeps your attachment system activated. Alternative: Information diet.

If the photo shows a new partner

  • Accept the possibility of a rebound. It is common, often unstable.
  • No DMs about the new relationship. A dignified step back protects you.
  • Communicate only if practically necessary, for example kids or contracts.

If you truly want to try again, ethically and realistically

  • Timing: Only after your reactivity is down. Earliest after several weeks of stability.
  • Signal: Not through the profile photo. Instead send calm, useful, short messages in a neutral context.
  • Behavior: Reliability, respect, no jealousy games.
  • Content: No past autopsy by chat. Keep it light, friendly, present-focused. Meet only when both seem relaxed.

What the new profile picture does not automatically mean

  • "They forgot me". No. People regulate in different ways and social media is often a facade.
  • "Hopeless". No. Dynamics shift over months, not weeks.
  • "Time to act!" Usually not. It is time to stabilize yourself.

Self-diagnosis: What role does social media play for you?

  • Questions: How often do you check their profile, what feelings arise, what do you do next, how do you feel 2 hours later?
  • If the answers often point to feeling worse, do a 14-30 day social media detox.

Micro interventions for everyday life

  • Stop sign note on your lock screen: "72 hours. Then decide."
  • Do not save passwords, add friction.
  • If-then plans: If I want to watch stories, then I go outside for 5 minutes.

Myths about social media signals

  • "Frequent profile changes mean they still love me". Myth. It is often identity searching.
  • "Neutral photo means indifference". Myth. Could be protection, professionalism, or routine.
  • "Photo with attractive people equals rejection". Myth. Context is always missing.

Red flags: When to seek help

  • Compulsive checking, sleep problems, impact on work.
  • Urge to create fake accounts to stalk.
  • Aggressive fantasies or self-worth crashes. A professional conversation can bring relief and tools.

Mini case studies: How meanings can flip

  • Case A: Ex posts party photos for weeks. Hypothesis: "Already over it." Three months later: Direct message, honest admission that it was distraction. Lesson: Social media is not an X-ray.
  • Case B: Ex switches to a couple photo. Six weeks later, they break up. Lesson: Rebounds are volatile. Do not act too fast.

An algorithmic look: Why you see everything, and still know nothing

  • Platforms show you what you stick to. Each click trains the algorithm.
  • Solution: Reduce consumption consciously, do not feed it.

Mental models that help

  • Distancing phrase: "This is a post, not a contract."
  • Time perspective: "In 6 weeks this will feel smaller."
  • Self-compassion: Talk to yourself like your best friend would.

Advanced strategy: The values board

  • Define three core values, for example calm, respect, growth.
  • Check every action against those values. Would respect comment right now? No. Then do not post.

When your ex comments on your profile picture

  • Keep it short, friendly, not flirty, unless you have planned later re-engagement and feel steady.
  • Do not mirror, no eye-for-an-eye posts. Stay you.

Context checklist before you interpret

  • How recent was your last contact, hours, days, weeks?
  • Any seasonal or work reasons for a new photo, job change, event, time of year?
  • Did the platform send auto reminders to update?
  • Does the photo fit your ex’s prior patterns, for example seasonal changes, spring sports pics?
  • Who is the platform’s primary audience, friends, coworkers, family?
  • Could the photo be mainly self-motivation, fitness, career, travel goals?
  • How would you read the photo if it were a stranger’s?
  • How certain are you on a 1-10 scale, and what two more pieces of evidence would raise that?
  • Which cognitive bias might be active, mind reading, confirmation bias?
  • What neutral alternative explanation is equally plausible?
  • What action aligns with your values even if your interpretation is wrong?
  • What does your body need right now, water, fresh air, sleep, before you decide?

Relapse protocol: If you reacted impulsively

  • Stop: Do not send more messages or comments. No long explanation.
  • Note: What was the trigger, feeling, need?
  • Repair: If you crossed practical boundaries, co-parenting, finances, send a short, neutral correction. No justifications.
  • Reset: 7-day micro detox, mute, fixed app windows, phone out of the bedroom at night.
  • Learn: Create an if-then plan for this exact trigger and put it somewhere visible.

Gender, culture, and context differences, quick view

  • Gender: Some studies suggest men after breakups perform strength or independence, women more social embeddedness or activity. Both can be mood regulation, not a message at you.
  • Culture: In collectivist contexts public signals are read more group-centered, in individualist contexts more as personal statements. Adjust your reading.
  • Age or life stage: Younger people post more, older people more selectively. A rare update with a clear occasion is often less coded than many small changes.

LGBTQIA+ and non-monogamous contexts

  • Outness and safety: Profile photos can serve protection, for example neutral images to maintain privacy. Do not read distance where protection is intended.
  • Relationship configurations: In open or polyamorous structures, public signals are often negotiated. If you had rules, continue to honor discretion and respect.

Re-engagement readiness check, if you want to keep chances

Answer yes or no:

  • I can go 14 days without profile checks.
  • I sleep 6-8 hours on average and do not use my phone in bed.
  • I can tolerate no reply without following up.
  • I have fulfilling routines without social media.
  • I do not feel pressured to talk about the profile photo.
  • My motive is connection, not validation or jealousy regulation. If you have fewer than 4 yes answers, do not text yet. Build stability first.

Values-based post ideas, not reactive

  • Health: A photo after a hike with a factual caption about the trail.
  • Learning: A short glimpse into a book or project that moves you, no jabs.
  • Community: Gratitude for friends or family, concrete and calm.
  • Creativity: A piece, instrument, DIY, focus on process, not gloss.

90-day resilience plan, short format

  • Days 1-30: Detox and stabilization, mute, sleep, movement, meals, journal. One weekly goal per area.
  • Days 31-60: Deepen values, start a course or project, cut screen time further, social media window once per day.
  • Days 61-90: Social reboot, nurture new or old friendships, 1-2 offline highlights per week. Optional: First neutral re-engagement if the readiness check is green.

When friends send screenshots

  • Script: "Thanks for thinking of me. It helps not to hear about their posts right now. Please do not send screenshots."
  • Consequence: Mute groups that regularly trigger you. Explain briefly, no drama.

Technical micro tools, device-agnostic

  • Focus or Do Not Disturb with a whitelist of 2-3 emergency contacts, ex not included.
  • Minimalist home screen, hide social apps in the app drawer.
  • Grayscale after 8 pm to lower stimulation.
  • Weekly screen time review with a small reward if you improve.

If your ex blocks or unblocks

  • If they block: Read it as a boundary. Do not switch channels. Respect the quiet.
  • If they unblock: That is not a cue to act. Stick to your plan. If you are stable and at phase B, send a neutral, useful message, no social media mentions.

Criteria for a green-light coffee invite

  • You have gone 30 days without impulsive checks or messages.
  • You have a fulfilling weekly routine independent of responses.
  • You can accept a no calmly.
  • You do not plan to talk about the profile photo.
  • The invite is light, 15-30 minutes, nearby, daytime, with an exit option.

Ethical re-engagement in one sentence

Communicate in ways that benefit both of you, even if nothing ever happens again.

Summary in three sentences

  • A profile picture is a loud but unreliable post-breakup signal.
  • Your best response is delayed, values-based, mostly silent.
  • If you stabilize yourself, you win, regardless of whether you reconcile.

Not necessarily. It often reflects identity work, mood regulation, or routine. Social media is curated, not transparent.

In 90% of cases, no. Silence is more mature and prevents escalation. Exceptions are purely practical contacts you already have, unrelated to the photo.

No. It can be a rebound, it does not have to be. Rebounds are statistically more volatile. Your rule: no jealousy reactions, focus on stability.

Yes. Studies show that monitoring your ex less supports healing. Muting is a practical option without dramatic signals.

Start with 30 days. Many report that triggers and reactivity drop significantly. Extend if needed.

Maybe, maybe not. It is often identity insecurity or a search for validation. Not reacting is usually best.

Subtle signals are often misunderstood and feel manipulative. Better: build real stability, later neutral and useful re-engagement, no mentions of social media.

Ask them kindly to stop. Explain it helps your healing. Set clear boundaries.

Yes if it fits your plan and well-being, not as a reaction. Choose something authentic that reflects your values.

If mute is not enough and you fall into compulsive patterns, blocking can be healthy. Do it quietly and for yourself.

Conclusion: Hope without illusions

When your ex changes their profile picture, it is not a code to crack. It is a test of self-leadership. Scientifically, these updates often express identity work, emotion regulation, or routine, not a clear message to you. Your strength is seeing triggers, delaying reactions, and acting by your values. That protects your healing, raises your attractiveness because calm is rare, and keeps every option open, including choosing yourself. Hope grows from stability, clarity, and respect for yourself and the person you once loved.

What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?

Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic reconciliation with your ex-partner is - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.

Scientific Sources

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.

Fisher, H. E., Xu, X., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213–232.

Sbarra, D. A. (2006). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Survival analyses of sadness and anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 298–312.

Marshall, T. C. (2012). Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: Associations with postbreakup recovery and personal growth. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 521–526.

Fox, J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2015). Romantic partner monitoring after breakups: Attachment, dependence, distress, and surveillance on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 491–498.

Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.

Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34–47.

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2010). Breakups and grief: Depression and anxiety in college students. Adolescence, 45(178), 409–427.

Kross, E., et al. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e69841.

Gottman, J. M. (2011). The science of trust: Emotional attunement for couples. W. W. Norton & Company.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection. Brunner-Routledge.

Tashiro, T., & Frazier, P. (2003). "I’ll never be in a relationship like that again": Personal growth following romantic relationship breakups. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 113–128.

Seltzer, L. J., Prososki, A. R., Ziegler, T. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2012). Instant messages vs. speech: Hormones and why we still need to hear each other. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 42–45.

Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 441–444.

Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 717–720.

Drouin, M., et al. (2017). Cyberstalking, monitoring, and perpetration in relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 296–303.

Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the Internet, and social media. Pew Research Center.

Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to Face It! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(11), 631–635.

Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2015). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Social Science Computer Review, 33(3), 300–321.