Texting Your Ex: Old School, but Surprisingly Effective?

Should you text your ex? Learn timing, templates, and psychology behind No Contact and first texts. Make a calm, respectful move with higher odds of a good reply.

18 min. read Communication & Contact

Why you should read this

You are thinking about texting your ex, but you are not sure if this old school channel still makes sense today. This article shows you how to use texts strategically: what happens in your brain after a breakup, how attachment styles matter, and how to craft messages that are respectful, clear, and effective. Based on research in attachment theory, the neurochemistry of love, and breakup psychology, you will get step-by-step plans, scenarios, and text templates for your first message, including warning signs, timing, and alternatives.

Texting an ex: Old school, still effective?

A plain text can feel old fashioned in the age of messaging apps, and that can be an advantage. Texting is:

  • stripped down: no colorful status, no reaction stickers, fewer online triggers.
  • less invasive: read receipts vary by device, fewer social media dynamics.
  • reliable: works without app updates or profile photos.

For many exes, a text feels more neutral than WhatsApp, Instagram, or DMs. Neutrality lowers reactivity, which is exactly what you need when emotions run high. Neutral does not mean automatically better though. It depends on timing, content, context (for example No Contact, kids, life circumstances), and most of all your internal state. In some cases, no contact is the best next step. In others, a short, clear text beats a call or voice note.

In this guide you will learn when texting makes sense, how to use it deliberately, and how to increase your odds of a respectful, constructive reply without pushing, manipulating, or pretending.

The science: Why a single text can trigger you

1Attachment systems on high alert

After a breakup, your attachment system activates. Work by Bowlby, Ainsworth, and Hazan & Shaver shows different attachment styles (secure, anxious, avoidant, disorganized). A text from you, or no reply, can trigger strong reactions by style:

  • anxious: rumination, urge to reconnect fast, overreading silence.
  • avoidant: pullback, reactance to bids for closeness, feeling crowded.
  • secure: better emotion regulation, more patience, clearer communication.

When you text an ex (or they text you), it unconsciously tests perceived attachment safety. Even a preview banner can activate your autonomic nervous system. Heart rate and cortisol rise, which is one reason a short text can feel so disproportionate.

2Neurochemistry of love and breakup

fMRI studies show romantic rejection activates reward and pain networks. Fisher and colleagues found that areas like the ventral striatum and anterior cingulate light up during rejection. This explains why a short text from an ex can feel like a high (dopamine) or like a sting. Social exclusion is processed in the brain similarly to physical pain. At the same time, memories of reward in the relationship can trigger craving. A message becomes a cue that ramps up wanting. This is why you need a deliberate texting plan.

3Breakup psychology: Contact can heal, or delay

Several studies show unstructured post-breakup contact often prolongs distress, especially for anxious styles and high rumination. Respectful, structured communication (for example in co-parenting) and clear, predictable contact are linked to less escalation. It is not “contact = bad”, it is “unclear, needy, conflictual contact = risk”. Texting is a double-edged sword: it can reduce escalation (asynchronous and brief), or it can amplify misunderstandings (no nonverbal cues).

4Communication psychology: Risk of misreading

Text is a lean channel. Tone, facial cues, timing get misread easily. Research shows readers tend to interpret neutral messages more negatively when the relationship is tense. Emojis can help, but with exes they often feel like too much. Texting wins because it is short. Brevity forces clarity, and that is your advantage.

5Intermittent reinforcement and push-pull

Unpredictable responses, warm then cold, intensify attachment in unhealthy ways. If you text impulsively, then disappear, then text again, you train both of you into a dopamine rollercoaster. A clear texting plan (for example fixed windows, topics, boundaries) reduces this pattern and raises the chance of steady, real re-engagement.

6Emotional safety as the base for reconnecting

Emotionally Focused Therapy (Johnson) and couple research (Gottman) emphasize: repair works when both feel safe. In text form that means: avoid blame, own your part, send small bids for connection that are easy to accept. A first message should open a door, not force the whole conversation.

The neurochemistry of love is comparable to drug addiction.

Dr. Helen Fisher , Anthropologist, Kinsey Institute

Old school vs. modern messengers: When text wins, and when not

  • Texting advantages:
    • less social noise: no profile photos, statuses, stories.
    • less pressure: read receipts vary, fewer signals to overread.
    • more formal: good for neutral first contact and logistics.
  • Texting drawbacks:
    • no formatting, keep it short anyway.
    • possible costs or international issues.
    • some see texts as distant. With very close exes, a voice note or call may fit later.

Recommendation: For first contact after No Contact or for sensitive topics, a text is often the safest option. Later, when the connection warms, move to a short call or video. Let the richness of the medium match the closeness.

Important: If there is a history of violence, stalking, legal orders, or a clear request for no contact, do not text. Safety and boundaries come first.

The 4-phase texting strategy (with timelines)

Goal: Build respectful, low-reactance contact that opens a door to dialogue.

Phase 1

Reset (No Contact and stabilization)

  • Duration: 21 to 35 days (based on breakup intensity and attachment style).
  • Focus: sleep, movement, social support, journaling, lower stress, stabilize self-worth.
  • No profile checking, no indirect messages.
  • Prep: list neutral shared reference points, write 3 to 5 text templates.
Phase 2

First text (low stakes, neutral)

  • Timing: weekday between 5 and 7 pm, not on holidays or anniversaries.
  • Content: short, specific, no pressure, no questions about feelings.
  • Goal: raise reply odds, invite a positive or neutral response.
Phase 3

Light follow-up exchanges

  • If they reply: 1 to 3 back-and-forth messages, then end kindly.
  • Topics: neutral updates, shared interests, non-pushy appreciation.
  • Pace: at most 1 to 2 contacts per week at the start.
Phase 4

Bridge to a call or brief meet

  • After 2 to 3 small, successful exchanges: suggest a 20-minute coffee or a short call.
  • Clear, light, no blame: “If not, totally okay.”

First message: Structure and examples

Your first text to your ex should make a yes easy and a no easy. Elements:

  • Subject-like opener: what is this about?
  • One sentence, two max.
  • No emotional weight, no “We need to talk”.
  • No questions about relationship, blame, or future.
  • Optional: a light pattern interrupt (unexpected but harmless).

Example templates:

  • Neutral logistics: “Hey Tom, I still have your book ‘Sapiens’. Want me to drop it in your mailbox tomorrow?”
  • Positive neutral: “Hey Jenna, I was walking along the riverfront and smiled because the food trucks are back. Tiny update: the espresso cart survived.”
  • Competence and respect: “Hey Alex, quick heads-up: your email to the property management office also came to me, I forwarded it. Done.”
  • Small ask with a bit of value: “Hey Leah, do you remember that vegan curry recipe? Do you still have the link? No rush, only if you find it fast.”

What not to do in the first text:

  • “I miss you so much, please answer.”
  • “Why are you ignoring me?”
  • “We need to fix this.”
  • “I met someone…” (Jealousy as a tactic is unethical and usually backfires.)

Do - first text

  • short, specific, friendly
  • no blame
  • no feelings talk
  • clear topic or reason
  • easy to answer

Don't - first text

  • text walls
  • urgency or ultimatums
  • ambiguous emojis 😢😡💔
  • late night or drunk texting
  • pushing on anniversaries

Timing, dosage, tone: The 6 golden rules

  1. Timing: pick calm windows (weekday, late afternoon). Not great: late at night (fatigue), Monday morning (stress), holidays (emotional charge).
  2. Length: 1 to 2 sentences. If you cannot say it in two, it is not a first text.
  3. Frequency: after your first message, wait 48 to 72 hours. No double texting unless there is a clear logistical reason (for example a time change), and label it clearly (“Quick update: …”).
  4. Tone: friendly, neutral, respectful. No sarcasm, no passive-aggressive edge.
  5. Topics: logistics, light appreciation, shared interests. No relationship processing by text.
  6. Exit: end a short exchange on purpose: “Thanks, I will text you next week.” It signals stability and self-regulation.

48 to 72 hrs

Spacing after the first text reduces impulsive reactions and improves follow-up quality.

1 to 2 sentences

Compact messages reduce misreads and reactance.

2 to 3 mini exchanges

Only then suggest a brief call or meet, not earlier.

Response matrix: How to reply to different reactions

  • No reply (after 72 hours):
    • Option A: let it go and try again in 7 to 10 days with a different, small reason.
    • Option B (if it is logistical): one factual reminder (“Quick reminder about the book: I will put it in your mailbox Friday.”). Then pause.
  • Neutral reply (“Okay”, “Thanks”):
    • Mirror the brevity, answer kindly, end early.
  • Positive reply (emojis, questions):
    • 1 to 3 exchanges, then close politely. No relationship turbo.
  • Negative or sharp reply:
    • De-escalate: “Got it. Thanks for being clear. I will not follow up.” Keep your word.

Examples:

  • No reply: “All good, I will handle it another way. Thanks anyway.” (Only if needed.)
  • Neutral reply: “Perfect, thanks. Hope you have a calm evening.”
  • Positive reply: “Sounds good! Happy to hear that. I am heading to the gym later, I will reach out next week.”
  • Negative reply: “Thanks for the feedback. I respect that. All the best.”

Tailoring to attachment styles

  • If your ex seems more anxious:
    • Emphasize reliability and predictability. Do not disappear after warm messages. Use small, planned contacts.
    • Example: “I will text you next Wednesday about the key handoff, so it is set.”
  • If your ex seems more avoidant:
    • Respect autonomy, keep things light. Avoid check-ins that feel like control.
    • Example: “No action needed, just info: package arrives Tuesday, I will leave it by the door.”
  • With a secure style:
    • More leeway. Still, no relationship talks by text.

If you share kids: texting as a co-parenting tool

For co-parenting, texting is often best: short, documented, neutral.

  • Tone: factual, friendly, no comments about the relationship.
  • Structure:
    • Subject: “Handoff Friday 6:00 pm”
    • Body: “Doctor appointment moved to 4:30. I will send the insurance card.”
  • Example:
    • “Handoff today at 6:00 pm at the South lot. I have the vaccine card with me.”

No mixing topics: never add emotional content to kid logistics (“By the way, I miss you”). Keep it separate.

Old school text vs. call, voice note, email

  • Call: rich signals, higher escalation risk, no time to think.
  • Voice note: tone is audible, good once things are warmer. Risky for a first reach-out, too intimate and too long.
  • Email: too formal and long, can feel like a letter and emotionally heavy.
  • Text: lean, contained, a solid choice for first careful steps.

Combination strategy: Start with text, then after 2 to 3 small successful exchanges suggest a short call (“10 minutes?”). This mirrors growing safety and reduces misreads.

Common mistakes, and how to avoid them

  • Text wall: reads as needy and overwhelming. Fix: two-sentence rule.
  • Hidden agenda: using logistics as a cover to actually process feelings. Fix: be honest, or do not send it.
  • Timing errors: late night, weekends, anniversaries. Fix: neutral windows.
  • Escalation triggers: blame, sarcasm, comparisons (“You always…”). Fix: observations, not accusations.
  • Urgency or ultimatums: “Right now!” Fix: “If it works for you, …”
  • Double texts: rarely needed. If you must, label clearly (“Quick update:”).

Self-regulation before you text: a 5-minute check

Before any text to your ex:

  • 10 deep breaths, inhale 4 to 6 seconds, exhale 6 to 8 seconds.
  • Body scan: jaw, hands, belly, release tension.
  • Read the message out loud: does it sound blaming or needy?
  • “Why now?” test: am I writing from clarity or fear?
  • Worst-case check: if there is no reply, will I stay steady?

If you answer no twice, do not send it.

Real-life scenarios with templates

Scenario 1: Sarah (34), anxious style; ex is avoidant

Background: 6-year relationship, he pulled back last year. Breakup 5 weeks ago, 28 days No Contact. Sarah wants to explain herself.

  • Goal: light, neutral reopening without pressure.
  • First text: “Hey Ryan, I still have the hand cream you left. Want me to put it in your mailbox tomorrow?”
  • If he replies “Yes, thanks”: “Will do. Have a good evening.” End.
  • 7 days later: “Quick heads-up: your package arrived today, I will set it out Thursday.”
  • After two factual exchanges: “If you want, I am near Northside Cafe Monday at 5:30. 10 minutes to say hi, super casual. If not, totally fine.”

Why it works: autonomy, predictability, no emotional pressure. Lower reactance for avoidant styles.

Scenario 2: Jason (29), co-parenting, high conflict

Background: 2 kids, conflicts escalate fast. Goal: safety and documentation.

  • Text structure: “Topic - Fact - Next step”
  • Example: “Handoff Friday 6:00 pm. Daycare closes at 1:00 pm (strike). I will pick up and bring the backpacks.”
  • If attacked (“You are late again!”): “I get that punctuality matters. Today 6:05 because of traffic, next time I will plan a 10-minute buffer.”

Scenario 3: Mia (41), he ended it, he is proud

Background: 2 years together, good times, then distance. Mia feels like sending a love letter.

  • First text: “Hey Ben, quick question: did you have the link to the bouldering gym on 5th? I cannot find the class schedule.”
  • If he replies warmly, she keeps it short, then closes: “Thanks! Good luck with your pitch tomorrow.”
  • Later: “I will be in your area next week. If you have 15 minutes, let me know. If not, totally fine.”

Scenario 4: Kevin (26), long distance, social media triggers

Background: After the breakup he checks her profile and reacts impulsively.

  • Fix: social media detox, text only.
  • First text after 21 days: “Hey Lisa, quick logistics: I am sending the electric bill adjustment today. Does the amount still look right?”
  • After a neutral exchange: 10 days pause, then a light shared memory without pathos: “You were right, that pho place in Prague was unbeatable. Found a similar one yesterday, almost as good.”

Scenario 5: Ava (38), high conflict, wants fairness

Background: Raw breakup, both hurt. Ava wants to show accountability without self-blame.

  • Text: “I want to apologize for my tone last week. That was not fair. I will not reach out further for now. All the best.”
  • Effect: ownership without demands. Lowers defenses, raises odds he opens later.

Scenario 6: Paul (45), long marriage, divorce in progress

Background: Much to settle legally. Paul writes long explanations.

  • Text frame: “Legal by email, logistics by text, emotional topics by call, but only if we both want that.”
  • Example: “Attorney appointment is confirmed for Tuesday at 3:00 pm. I will bring the documents.”
  • Later, if the tone is good: “Thanks for the cooperative meeting today. I appreciate it.”

Micro wording: small words, big effect

  • “If it works for you…” instead of “You need to…”
  • “Quick heads-up:” signals logistics.
  • “No rush” eases time pressure.
  • Concrete verbs (“leave it in your mailbox”) instead of vague ones (“let me know”).
  • No mind reading (“You probably do not want to…”). Leave space.

When not to text

  • You are acutely triggered (racing heart, shaking, anger, tears). Regulate first, then write, or do not send it.
  • You want to process blame or the past. Not for text.
  • You want to test jealousy. Unethical and damages trust.
  • There are clear requests for space or legal restrictions.

Respecting boundaries is not only a legal necessity, it is attachment-smart: safety grows from predictability and respect.

If you messed up: a reset text

  • Own it briefly, no counter-demands.
  • No “but”.
  • Example: “My message yesterday was unfair. I am sorry. I will not follow up for now.”
  • Then pause 14 to 21 days. Prove consistency.

From text to talk: building the bridge

When to suggest it?

  • After 2 to 3 light, positive exchanges.
  • When your ex asks questions or shows initiative.
  • When you are emotionally steady, even if they say no.

Phrasing:

  • “Would you want a 10-minute call next week? If not, no problem.”
  • “I am near the park Wednesday. If 15 minutes works for you, great. If not, all good.”

Why short? Short, clear proposals lower decision stress. Open-ended “sometime” is harder to accept.

Advanced: read subtext without overinterpreting

  • Response time: slow does not equal no interest. People have jobs, lives, emotions. Watch patterns, not one-offs.
  • Tone: neutral brevity can be politeness, not a slight.
  • Emojis: go light early on. Mirror later if it fits.
  • Questions: one question mark per message is enough.

Self-protection: build your life in parallel

The best texting plan fails if your life is on hold. Research shows self-compassion, social support, movement, and sleep improve emotion regulation and reduce rumination. When you stabilize, you write better texts and you can handle no and yes.

Templates for common situations

  • Returning items:
    • “Hey …, I will put your … in your mailbox Friday at 6:00 pm. Does that work?”
  • Money or contracts:
    • “Quick heads-up: I am sending half the utilities today. Can you confirm the amount?”
  • Neutral reminder:
    • “Reminder about the keys: I will be there tomorrow at 5:30.”
  • Light connection (shared memory, no pressure):
    • “The cinnamon roll stand is back. Made me think of the holiday market. That was nice.”
  • Respectful pullback after reactance:
    • “Thanks for being clear. I respect that and will not follow up.”

Short bridge lines

  • “No rush.”
  • “If it works.”
  • “Quick heads-up:”
  • “I will handle it.”
  • “I will drop it off.”

Avoid these triggers

  • “We need to talk.”
  • “Always or never”
  • “You made me…”
  • Blame or armchair diagnoses
  • Ambiguous sarcasm

Tech and practice: delivery reality, devices, privacy

  • iMessage, RCS, SMS mix: stay on the channel you started with. Switching channels out of the blue can send meta-signals. Consistency calms.
  • Delivery or read receipts: do not rely on them. Devices and networks vary. Your plan matters more than status icons.
  • New number? No surprise numbers. If your number changed, reintroduce yourself: “Hey, this is … (new number). Quick heads-up: …”
  • Blocked? Respect it. No workarounds through friends or other channels. Trust starts with boundaries.
  • Privacy: do not text sensitive legal or health info. Use secure channels (email or letter) and stick to agreements.
  • Screenshots: do not write anything you would not want to see in a screenshot tomorrow. It keeps you factual.

12 more templates by context

  • Status update without expectation:
    • “Quick update: the security deposit arrived today. I will forward it tomorrow.”
  • Appreciation without heaviness:
    • “Thanks for your quick reply the other day. Made the logistics easier.”
  • Shared resource:
    • “I will upload the moving photos to the folder by Friday. Link via email.”
  • Mini bid with space:
    • “I am by the bakery at 5:10 tomorrow. 10 minutes to say hi? If not, totally okay.”
  • Clear close after a mini exchange:
    • “Thanks, that is all from me. Have a calm evening.”
  • After a cool phase (7 to 10 days later):
    • “Hey, quick check: this Friday or next week for the handoff, which works better?”
  • After a small conflict:
    • “I can see the tone was not great yesterday. I will own my part and keep it brief now.”
  • After a positive exchange, do not overdo it:
    • “Nice chatting. I will reach out next week, have a good one!”
  • After your ex says they have little time:
    • “Thanks for the heads-up. I will keep it brief and coordinate by text.”
  • After a long hiatus (months):
    • “Hey …, hope it is okay that I text. Quick logistical thing: forwarding the mail, does c/o still work?”
  • With a shared hobby:
    • “Concert dates for fall just dropped. Your pick (Venue X) was great, acoustics were top.”
  • Resource-wise step back:
    • “I am taking time for myself now and will not reach out for a while. Wishing you well.”

More scenarios, nuanced thinking

Scenario 7: After a breach of trust (for example, infidelity)

Goal: safety, no justification battles by text.

  • First text (only if contact is wanted and safe): “I respect your space. If logistics come up, I will keep it short and factual here. Otherwise I will not reach out.”
  • Later: brief ownership, no detail debate: “I am owning my part. Details are better in a conversation, if you ever want that.”

Scenario 8: LGBTQ+ with a shared friend group

Goal: avoid friend-group drama, set boundaries.

  • “I am keeping our stuff out of the friend group and I am asking you to do the same. For logistics, we will keep it short here.”
  • For a party or event: “I will arrive around 8:30. I will keep my distance to keep it low-key.”

Scenario 9: Your ex is already dating

Goal: respect, protect yourself.

  • “I heard you are seeing someone. I respect that and will keep it short and factual for logistics.”
  • No jabs, no comparisons. If it hurts too much, name a longer pause.

Fine-tuning by breakup reason

  • Lots of fights or poor patterns: use I-statements and observations: “I notice we talk past each other by text. I will keep my texts short.”
  • Distance or overwhelm: emphasize autonomy: “No action needed, just info.”
  • Different life goals: do not debate big life choices by text. Focus on respectful wrap-up and small, real bids without pressure.

14-day stabilization plan before the first text

  • Days 1 to 3: prioritize sleep, reduce caffeine and alcohol, 30 minutes of movement daily.
  • Days 4 to 6: social media diet, fixed phone windows (for example twice a day for 15 minutes).
  • Days 7 to 9: clarify values. What do you want your message to express (respect, clarity, calm)? Note 3 keywords.
  • Days 10 to 12: draft templates, read them out loud, sanity-check with a neutral person.
  • Day 13: rehearsal, do not send, observe your body’s reaction.
  • Day 14: send in your chosen window, then no checking for 24 hours.

Week-by-week plan for the first 6 weeks after contact

  • Week 1: 1 neutral text, at most 1 short exchange. No meetup.
  • Week 2: 1 to 2 brief contacts, if positive, close kindly. No deep topics.
  • Week 3: after 2 successful mini exchanges, suggest a micro meet (10 to 20 minutes).
  • Week 4: if going well, one short call (10 minutes) on a clear topic.
  • Week 5: a casual, short coffee (max 45 minutes), no “processing the past”.
  • Week 6: re-assess. Is this good for you? Is initiative mutual? If not, reduce dosage.

Quality checklist for good texts

  • Clarity: can a neutral person grasp it in 5 seconds?
  • Respect: does it include choice (“if it works”)?
  • Honesty: is the reason real, no backdoor?
  • Stability: can you feel okay without a reply?

Special case: your ex texts you first

If they text first:

  • Do not reply instantly (unless it is a logistics emergency). Wait 30 to 120 minutes.
  • Mirror their level: neutral and brief, then end kindly.
  • If they clearly open up (“How are you really?”): answer thoughtfully but briefly, then suggest a later phone call instead of more texting.

Examples:

  • “Good to hear from you. I am on the go, I will text back later today.”
  • “Thanks for asking. I am okay. Want a 10-minute call tomorrow?”

Common myths about texting your ex

  • “If I do not reply right away, it is over.” False. A calm, steady tone is more attractive than urgency.
  • “Long means honest.” False. Honesty needs safety, which grows from calm and respect, not length.
  • “Jealousy creates interest.” Maybe briefly, at the cost of trust and self-respect.
  • “No reply means no interest.” Not always. Work, stress, attachment style, and timing matter. Watch patterns.

Metrics: how to know you are on track

  • Your heart rate stays steady when you send or get no reply.
  • You keep pauses without falling apart.
  • Replies get a bit warmer or more predictable.
  • You do not need pretexts, you can ask directly and kindly.

Pitfalls of going deep too soon

Why you should not process the relationship by text:

  • High complexity and high misread risk.
  • Emotional overwhelm, your ex may shut down.
  • Missing repair frame (no nonverbal cues, no co-regulation).

Instead: use text for bridges, calls or meets for depth.

When the reply hurts: handling rejection by text

  • Name it internally: “That hurts, and that is normal.”
  • Soothe your body: breathe, walk, cold water.
  • Do not send a countertext. 24-hour rule.
  • Next time: increase distance, focus on your healing.

Mini checklists to print

Short text checklist:

  • Clear goal? (logistics, mini update, bridge)
  • 1 to 2 sentences?
  • No blame, no diagnosis?
  • Neutral timing?
  • Steady even if no reply?

Reply checklist:

  • Mirror (tone and length)
  • Max 1 to 3 exchanges
  • End kindly
  • Do not open a new topic

Ethics and respect: no games, no tricks

This guide avoids tactics like jealousy plays, weaponized ghosting, or tests. Research and experience show: short-term wins cost long-term trust. Respect, consistency, and clarity are the base, even if the outcome is uncertain.

Bottom line: hope with both feet on the ground

Old school does not mean outdated. Used well, a text to your ex is a precise, respectful tool. It opens doors without pushing. It protects you from impulsive escalation and gives your ex room without feeling controlled. Research suggests this style of communication lowers attachment triggers, reduces misreads, and sets the stage for genuine reconnection, if both want it. If not, you still learned to communicate clearly, calmly, and kindly when it is hard. That stays with you.

What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?

Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic reconciliation with your ex-partner is - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.

Scientific Sources

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, G. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290–292.

Sbarra, D. A. (2006). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Survival analyses of sadness and anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 298–312.

Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213–232.

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2011). Breakup distress in university students. Adolescence, 46(182), 405–420.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221–233.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed.). Brunner-Routledge.

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402.

Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.

Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., & Ng, Z.-W. (2005). Egocentrism over e-mail: Can we communicate as well as we think? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 925–936.

Byron, K. (2008). Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 309–327.

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

Slotter, E. B., Gardner, W. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Who am I without you? The influence of romantic breakup on the self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 147–160.

Rains, S. A., Brunner, S. R., Akers, C., Pavlich, C. A., & Goktas, S. (2017). Computer-mediated communication (CMC) and social support: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 518–563.

Drouin, M., & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students' romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 444–449.