How long should No Contact last after 1 year together?

How long should No Contact be after a 1-year relationship? Get a science-backed 30-60 day plan with tools to heal, reset, and reconnect wisely.

20 min. read No Contact

Why this article matters

You are asking how long No Contact should last after a 1-year relationship, so you do not lose your ex or yourself. This guide gives you a clear, science-backed answer and a practical step-by-step plan. Research in attachment, neurobiology, and breakup psychology explains why planned silence accelerates healing, reduces relapses, and, if you want a second chance, increases your odds in a realistic way. No empty promises and no push-pull, just an honest strategy you can use.

Why the length of No Contact depends on relationship length

A relationship of about one year sits in a transition zone. You likely built strong emotions and routines, but often not deep life entanglements like kids, shared mortgages, or decades of overlapping networks. That means:

  • Your attachment system is activated enough that any message can trigger strong pain or hope (Bowlby; Ainsworth).
  • Your window for sustainable reset is realistic. Patterns are not yet cemented for years, and conditioning (like daily good-morning texts) can be unlearned more quickly (extinction in learning psychology).

For No Contact, you need long enough to lower physiological withdrawal and mental rumination, but not so long that all warmth fades if you hope to reconnect later. In practice, for 1-year relationships a range of 30 to 60 days often works, depending on attachment style, breakup reason, and logistics. Here is why.

The science: What happens in your brain and body

No Contact is not magic. It targets specific psychobiological processes.

  • Attachment system: Following Bowlby and Ainsworth, our bonding system reacts to loss with protest, despair, then reorientation. Early and frequent contact keeps protest active, prolongs despair, and delays reorientation.
  • Reward and withdrawal: fMRI studies show that romantic rejection activates reward and craving circuits, similar to addictive processes (Fisher et al., 2010). Every ping from an ex can feel rewarding short term, but it reinforces dependency long term.
  • Pain networks: Social rejection and breakup pain recruit physical pain regions, which is why it feels bodily (Kross et al., 2011). No Contact reduces constant re-triggering of this loop.
  • Stress axis: Cortisol and autonomic stress markers are elevated after breakups (Sbarra, 2006/2008). Quiet periods without triggers help downshift your stress axis, normalize sleep, and restore cognitive control.
  • Identity and self-concept: Breakups often shake identity (Slotter, Gardner & Finkel, 2010). Silence creates space to stabilize a self without the ex, a key predictor of better adjustment.
  • Rumination: What-if loops keep pain alive and correlate with depressive symptoms (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2001). No Contact removes fuel for rumination, fewer new clues means fewer trigger-response spirals.
  • Long-term love is possible, but different: Strong romantic love can exist in long relationships, with less obsession and more secure bonding (Acevedo et al., 2012). After about a year, your system has learned bonding. No Contact lets over-activated, addictive elements settle while keeping your capacity for attachment.

The neurochemistry of love overlaps with addiction, withdrawal feels real. A period of distance is often necessary for the brain to recalibrate.

Dr. Helen Fisher , Anthropologist, Kinsey Institute

The core answer: How long is No Contact after a 1-year relationship?

Short answer with nuance: 30-60 days. The exact duration depends on

  • your attachment style (anxious, secure, avoidant),
  • the breakup reason (overwhelm vs. ongoing disrespect),
  • logistical entanglements (kids, work),
  • current stress level and emotional reactivity.

30-45 days

Common baseline for 1-year relationships without big entanglements

45-60 days

If you are highly reactive, have on-off history, or anxious-avoidant dynamics

No classic NC

Violence, stalking, severe codependency: prioritize safety and professional help, not reconnection

Why these windows?

  • 21-30 days: notable drop in acute physiological reactivity, sleep, appetite, and focus start to stabilize (Sbarra, 2008; Field, 2011).
  • 30-45 days: enough distance to reduce rumination and reorder self-concept (Slotter et al., 2010) without fully drying out the bond.
  • 45-60 days: useful if any contact strongly triggers you, or if patterns like criticism/defensiveness (Gottman) burdened the relationship and you need more inner work.

Phased plan: What actually happens during No Contact

Phase 1

Acute stabilization (Day 0-7)

  • Immediate stop after a clear, respectful announcement (see templates below).
  • Goals: protect sleep, lower stress, set emergency routines.
  • No social media stalking; start a digital diet.
Phase 2

Neuro-emotional reset (Day 8-21)

  • Interrupt reward and pain loops by reducing all triggers.
  • Daily self-care: movement, nutrition, social support, expressive writing.
  • First sober review of why you broke up.
Phase 3

Identity and pattern work (Day 22-45)

  • Work on attachment triggers (like anxious protest behaviors).
  • Learn communication skills (soft startups, owning your part, Gottman).
  • Build a realistic vision for a second chapter or a clean ending.
Phase 4

Strategic reorientation (Day 46-60)

  • Extend NC only if you still get strongly triggered.
  • Otherwise, prep re-entry with clear goals, neutral first touchpoints, and firm boundaries.
Phase 5

Re-entry or closure (from Day 45/60)

  • Low-stakes first contact, no blame at all.
  • Or: intentional closure, a small ritual, focus on the future.

Tailoring the length to your attachment style

Secure

  • Recommendation: 30-40 days often suffice.
  • Traits: you regulate emotions well, avoid drama, are accessible and direct.
  • Goal: brief reset, reflect, then a respectful first contact.

Anxious-ambivalent

  • Recommendation: 45-60 days, because protest behaviors (calling, pleading, engineered "coincidences") are more common.
  • Focus: self-soothing, boundaries, rebuilding a life outside the relationship.

Avoidant

  • Recommendation: 30-45 days. Risk: cutting off too early instead of integrating emotions.
  • Focus: allow feelings, later engage in real dialogue instead of retreat.

Anxious-avoidant (mixed)

  • Recommendation: 45-60 days, plus coaching/therapy is useful.
  • Focus: understand triggers, plan communication windows, do not react impulsively.

Note: Attachment styles are tendencies, not destiny. Use NC to gain flexibility, not to label yourself.

Practical application: Your 6-step plan for 30-60 days

Announce the boundary, respectful and clear
  • Formula: appreciation + purpose of distance + clear frame.
  • Example: "I need space to process the breakup. I will reach out when I am more stable. Please respect that. Thank you."
  • If kids/work: "I am reachable by email for logistics on Wednesdays, 12-1 pm. Otherwise, please do not message me."
Implement digital hygiene right away
  • Mute, do not necessarily block unless there are boundary violations.
  • No story views, no "accidental" likes.
  • Go cold turkey on late-night scrolling: remove apps from the home screen, set time limits.
Regulate the body first
  • 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week, strength training twice. Movement lowers stress hormones and improves sleep.
  • Sleep: consistent bedtime, 30 minutes screen-free, discuss melatonin with your healthcare provider, otherwise lean on sleep hygiene.
  • Nutrition: protein, complex carbs, omega-3s, low alcohol. Alcohol amplifies rumination.
Offload your mind, in writing and socially
  • Expressive writing (Pennebaker): 15-20 minutes per day, 3-4 days per week, not endless.
  • Social net: 2-3 trusted people, clear ask: "I need listening, not advice."
  • Mindfulness 10 minutes per day (Keng et al., 2011): attention on breath, notice thoughts without following them.
Review the relationship, but with structure
  • Which patterns were changeable? (for example, criticism/defensiveness, Gottman)
  • What is non-negotiable? Respect, core values.
  • Your part vs. their part, without self-destruction or blame.
Plan re-entry, if it makes sense
  • First contact: neutral, brief, positive, no demands.
  • 1-2 low-investment interactions, then suggest a conversation without pressure.
  • Go deeper only after clear signals of willingness to change.

Caution with violence, stalking, coercive control, or severe codependency: safety comes first, not reconnection. No Contact may need to be long term or guided by professionals. In immediate danger: call the police/911.

Real-life examples: 5 scenarios

  • Sarah, 34, together 1 year, anxious: After the breakup she sends daily "Just checking in" texts. Result: quick pings, then silence. Recommendation: 45 days NC. Actions: social media diet, weekly movement plan, daily writing. After 3 weeks she feels less urge and more clarity. Day 47: neutral first contact, two short friendly exchanges, then a coffee meet-up without relationship talk.
  • Daniel, 29, together 1 year, on-off pattern: Both trigger each other. Recommendation: 60 days NC. Focus: pattern work (why does criticism escalate so fast?). After 6 weeks: first text, then a call with clear boundaries.
  • Mia, 41, together 1 year, shared project at work: Pure NC is not possible. Solution: strict business-only communication (BIFF: brief, informative, friendly, firm), weekly summary email, no ad-hoc chats. Duration: 45 days. After that: neutral small talk in the team, no private topics.
  • Jake, 27, avoidant: After the breakup he withdraws and feels guilty. He wants to text "as friends" to soothe her. Recommendation: 30-40 days NC, then an honest check-in. Goal: act from clarity, not guilt.
  • Lauren, 33, anxious-avoidant, ex sends breadcrumbs: NC 60 days to break the push-pull cycle. Response rule: no reaction to vague emojis or "How are you?" without substance. Later, re-enter with a clear, purpose-driven message.

What counts as contact, and what does not?

  • Contact is anything that reactivates you: texts, calls, surprise visits, story views, DMs, "accidental" likes, indirect messages via friends.
  • Exceptions: kids/work/finances. Stay strictly factual, time-boxed, written if possible, no small talk, no emojis.
  • Logistics: need to exchange items? Fixed time slots, neutral location, bring a third person if helpful, 15 minutes max, no "How are you really?"

Social media strategy during NC

  • Unfollow or mute? Muting often suffices. If the urge to check is high, temporarily unfriend to protect yourself.
  • No status games: no flirty revenge posts, no quote subtweets. This hurts you and any chance of reconnection (Marshall, 2012).
  • Digital detox window: 30 days of zero ex-related clicks, 10 minutes per day max on social media, use a timer.

If you have kids or pets: limited-contact rules

  • Channel: email or a co-parenting app with clear history.
  • Time blocks: for example, Mondays 8-9 am, Thursdays 5-6 pm.
  • Format: BIFF, brief, informative, friendly, firm.
  • Hand-offs: set time, place, and duration; no relationship talk at the door.
  • Emergencies: define what counts as an emergency (medical, school, accident).

Wrong/right example:

Wrong: "Hey, how are you? The kids miss you."
Right: "Hand-off Friday 6 pm as agreed. Shoes are in the backpack."

How to set the right length for you: the 5R checklist

Extend NC if the following five Rs are still strong. Shorten only after they fade.

  • Reactivity: your heart races or palms sweat when their name pops up.
  • Rumination: you spend more than 60 minutes per day thinking about the breakup.
  • Relapse impulses: urge to text, "accidentally" show up, reread old chats.
  • Reality loss: you idealize or demonize them in extremes.
  • Rule-breaking: you have not kept your own NC rules for two consecutive weeks.

If 4-5 are strong: closer to 60 days. If 1-2 and you are stable: 30-45 days may suffice.

Re-entry after NC: the smart way

  • Goal: test connection quality, not "get back together now".
  • First-contact templates:
    • "Hey, I walked by that cafe you like and thought of their great flat white. How have you been?"
    • "Quick question: do you remember the name of that podcast you recommended?"
  • Rules: brief, kind, no blame, no heavy "We need to talk" energy.
  • Rhythm: if they reply kindly, send another short message after 24-48 hours. No message cascades.
  • Next step: after 2-3 positive exchanges, suggest a casual meet at a neutral spot for 45-60 minutes. No past battles.
  • Conversation guardrails: 80% light/neutral, 20% reflection ("I noticed I withdraw under stress, I am working to do that differently."). No demands, only self-responsibility.

What if NC "does not work"?

Common reasons:

  • Micro-breaks you do not notice: story views, indirect messages via friends, likes.
  • You confuse silence with waiting and do not work on yourself.
  • You choose a duration that is too short given your reactivity.
  • You use NC to punish, not to care for yourself, which sabotages later talks.

Fixes:

  • Write down your rules, involve a buddy.
  • Daily routines for movement, sleep, writing, social support.
  • Mindfulness/CBT tools against rumination (Keng et al., 2011).
  • Consider professional support if grief or anxiety is very high.

Why 30-60 days often fits everyday life

  • Neuro time: reward and stress circuits need weeks to calm (Fisher; Sbarra).
  • Learning time: extinction and reconditioning need repeated non-reward, so consistent zero contact.
  • Identity time: self-concept and goals do not snap into place overnight (Slotter).
  • Communication time: new skills like I-statements and soft startups require practice (Gottman; Johnson).

Common mistakes and how to avoid them

  • NC as a power play: triggers pushback and guilt loops. Instead, communicate NC as self-protection and an honest boundary.
  • Hope spike equals break: one little ping and you stop NC. Tip: wait until your agreed date, set a 24-hour delay window if needed.
  • Over-analysis: "What does this emoji mean?" Keep out of the pain loop. Rule: do not interpret texts during NC, if unclear, do not respond.
  • Dry drunk: you hold NC, but reread chats constantly. Keep a digital hygiene log.

Ethics and respect

  • No jealousy maneuvers, fake stories, or engineered "coincidences".
  • Respect a clear no. Aim for dignity in connection, whether again or in goodbye.

Advanced: if you must see each other (college, work, friend group)

  • Micro-NC: only minimal, polite communication, no personal topics.
  • Protocols: greet - work - say goodbye, no "How are you really?"
  • Adjust seats/routes so you do not constantly re-trigger.

Mini-manual: message templates

Announcing NC (no kids):

  • "I need some space to get clear. I will reach out in a few weeks. Please do not message me until then, I am focusing on my own work."

Announcing NC (with kids/work):

  • "For logistics I am reachable by email Mondays 8-9 am. Personally I need space to process this. Thanks for respecting that."

Responding to boundary violations:

  • "I asked for space and I am keeping that boundary. Please respect it."

First contact after NC:

  • "Your book recommendation really helped this week. Thank you. How are you?"

Do not respond during NC to:

  • "Hey" or "What are you up to?" without context. Those are breadcrumbs. Later you can say you prefer substantive exchanges.

When to extend NC

  • You feel panic when imagining a meeting.
  • Your day rises and falls with their last story.
  • You cannot calmly express what you will do differently next time. Choose 15 more days instead. That improves the chance of real quality later.

What if you do not want them back?

NC still helps, now as a closing ritual. Invest the same energy in self-care and future plans, with the goal of letting go instead of reconnecting. Write a closure letter (do not send), return small items symbolically, start new routines.

Communication tools after NC

  • Gottman: soft startups, responsibility, recognizing repair attempts.
  • Johnson (EFT): name emotions, express attachment needs without blame.
  • Hendrick: love as style, know yours and theirs to reduce misunderstandings.

Quick example after NC:

  • "I realized I get demanding under stress and that hurts you. I want to practice connecting first, then sharing my ask. Are you open to trying that with me?"

Readiness check for first contact

  • You can imagine a possible no without panicking.
  • You sleep well for 5-6 nights in a row.
  • You reactivated a life beyond the relationship (sports, friends, projects).
  • You can name 2-3 concrete behaviors you will do differently, regardless of their response. If you check 3-4, go ahead. If 0-1, wait.

Understand the why behind the breakup

  • Overload/timing? NC reduces pressure.
  • Deep injuries (criticism, contempt, defensiveness, stonewalling - the Four Horsemen, Gottman)? You will need structural changes and probably willingness for couples therapy.
  • Values clash (kids, lifestyle)? NC clarifies if compromise is possible.

Specific traps around the 1-year mark

  • Too fast, too much: intense fusion, low autonomy.
  • On-off in short cycles: drama becomes rewarding. NC breaks the reinforcement loop.
  • Vague expectations: months of "It is fine" until it explodes. NC creates room for an honest status check.

From theory to practice

  • Bowlby/Ainsworth: accept attachment pain as normal, do not give it new triggers.
  • Fisher/Young: give your reward system real nourishment (movement, nature, friends) instead of micro-doses of your ex.
  • Sbarra/Field: daily routines beat waiting, contact with an ex correlates with slower emotional regulation.
  • Slotter: use the time to strengthen your self. It also makes any possible reconnection more attractive.

Long view: what you do after NC matters more than the exact day count

Whether it is 35 or 52 days matters less than the quality of your growth. Use NC as a program:

  • Body: sleep, movement, nutrition.
  • Mind: writing, mindfulness, reflection without self-harm.
  • Communication: practice tools now, not later.
  • Boundaries: set and keep them respectfully.

No Contact vs. Low Contact: when each makes sense

  • Full No Contact is best when there are no necessary logistics and your emotional reactivity is high.
  • Low Contact is better if you work together, attend the same college, co-parent, share a dog, or have a tight friend group.
  • Decision tree:
    • Are there unavoidable logistics? Yes → Low Contact with firm rules (channel, times, BIFF format). No → No Contact.
    • Do you stay emotionally stable for more than 24 hours after factual contact? Yes → Low Contact can continue. No → reduce interactions, consider a third person for hand-offs.
  • Low Contact rules: purely factual, written, no reply obligation under 24 hours, no emojis, no personal topics.

14-day acute plan (Day 1-14) for fresh breakups

  • Day 1: announce NC, mute numbers, start social media detox, set a sleep plan.
  • Day 2: 45 minutes brisk walking, 15 minutes writing "What do I feel?" Stock the fridge with basics.
  • Day 3: tell your buddy ("If I wobble, I will call you."). Evening: no binge-watching.
  • Day 4: first list "What was in my control? What was not?" Bullet points only, no self-bashing.
  • Day 5: micro-joy: 30 minutes of something you loved before the relationship (music, drawing, cooking).
  • Day 6: de-trigger your space: put visible reminders in a box. Do not toss them, just out of sight.
  • Day 7: weekly review: sleep, movement, social media, any NC breaks? Tweak your plan.
  • Day 8: mindfulness 10 minutes, then read for 20 minutes (not breakup content).
  • Day 9: full-body strength session (squats, pushups, rows/bands).
  • Day 10: values check: pick 3 values to guide your next relationship (for example, honesty, humor, teamwork).
  • Day 11: meet a trusted friend, state in advance: "No ex deep-dive, let us walk and laugh."
  • Day 12: digital spring cleaning: turn off auto photo backups, cut notifications in half.
  • Day 13: creativity outlet: write a letter to yourself in 6 months (not to your ex).
  • Day 14: mini-celebration of progress, lock in your plan for weeks 3-4.

Special cases and fine-tuning

If your ex is already dating or in a new relationship

  • Keep NC. Double down on social media detox (unfollow/mute).
  • No counter-dating for revenge. It increases pain and muddies signals.
  • Re-enter only if you are not comparing or competing and there are real reasons for a new chapter.

Birthdays, holidays, bereavement

  • During NC, do not send birthday or holiday messages, except for close family bereavement: send a short, dignified note ("I am very sorry for your loss. My condolences."), with no questions or emojis.
  • After NC: birthdays are not a re-entry hack. Use neutral everyday cues instead.

Shared home, furniture, contracts

  • Micro-NC with hand-off slots (15-30 minutes), witnesses or video inventory.
  • Emotional safety before efficiency. Two short appointments beat one long, tearful marathon.
  • Prioritize contracts/finances: settle those first, then small talk, or better, no small talk.

Mental health and NC

  • Depression/anxiety/ADHD: structure and external supports (coach/therapy, medication as prescribed) increase NC success.
  • Polyvagal mini-exercises (Porges): longer exhales, humming, cool water on your face 3 times per day to calm your nervous system.

LGBTQ+, age, culture

  • Principles are universal: reduce triggers, strengthen self-concept, communicate clearly.
  • Community overlap can be higher: keep Low Contact rules tight so gossip does not steer you.

No Contact by breakup reason: subtle differences

  • Infidelity (single incident, remorseful): lean 45-60 days. After that, only continue with clear structures (transparency, therapy willingness, specific agreements).
  • Chronic criticism/defensiveness (Gottman’s Four Horsemen): 45-60 days plus communication work. Re-enter only with concrete tools.
  • Burnout/overwhelm: 30-45 days, focus on relief, sleep, workload. No heavy relationship debates under exhaustion.
  • Values mismatch (for example, kids): NC clarifies whether real compromise is possible, otherwise choose closure instead of a loop.

Measuring progress: your NC scorecard (weekly)

  • Sleep: 0-2 (poor) to 8-10 (stable).
  • Rumination: minutes per day (target under 30).
  • Trigger reaction: heart rate/sweat/urge when thinking of your ex (0-10).
  • Rule adherence: percent of your NC rules kept (target over 90%).
  • Life re-activation: number of social/professional activities per week.
  • Communication clarity: have you written 3 changed behaviors? Yes/No.

Cognitive tools against relapse urges

  • Delay: "If I want to text, I will wait 24 hours and walk for 10 minutes."
  • Reframe: "Contact eases pain short term, but keeps it alive long term."
  • Thought log (ABC): antecedent - belief - consequence, add an alternative belief.
  • If-then plans: "If I feel lonely at night, I will call X and go outside for 15 minutes."

Low-drama re-entry: the 3-meet protocol

  • Meeting 1 (45-60 min): neutral place, small talk plus light sharing of your insights, no past battles.
  • Meeting 2 (60-75 min): interests/everyday life, one concrete change point, celebrate a mini win ("I learned to connect first, then ask.").
  • Meeting 3 (90 min): only now, carefully explore relationship questions ("What would we need so this feels good?"). Clear stop rule if it escalates.

Roles: leaver vs. left

  • You ended it: NC protects you from guilt-driven contact. Check whether you want to return from longing or from guilt.
  • You were left: NC protects you from pleading and chasing. Work on self-worth, skills, and social support in parallel.

Do’s and don’ts in brief

  • Do: announce, follow through, work on yourself, stay respectful, no hidden messages.
  • Don’t: respond to breadcrumbs, play status games, engineer "chance" meetings, reread chat archives together, text late at night.

Decision guide: 30/45/60 days

  • Low reactivity, no entanglements, secure style → 30-40 days.
  • Medium reactivity, some logistics → 45 days.
  • High reactivity, on-off history, anxious-avoidant → 60 days.
  • Violence, addiction, control → do not plan reconnection; prioritize protection and help.

Extended FAQs

Is 30 days of NC enough after a 1-year relationship?

Often yes, if your emotional reactivity is moderate and there are no big entanglements. If rumination and triggers are high, aim for 45-60 days.

Will I ruin my chances if I say nothing for 60 days?

No, not if you announced NC respectfully. Silence signals self-regulation, not disinterest. Many exes appreciate the calmer quality of later conversations.

What if they text during NC?

In true NC, do not reply. Exception: kids/work/emergency, then keep it short and factual (BIFF). For repeated boundary crossings, restate your boundary clearly.

Can you do NC while sharing a home?

If possible, move out temporarily or define hand-off times. Otherwise, micro-NC: only logistical statements, headphones, separate rooms, no evening talks. Time-limit it, like 30-45 days, while you create a housing plan.

Does social media break NC?

Yes, if stories/posts trigger you. Mute or unfollow to protect yourself. No revenge posts.

How do I know I am ready to reach out?

If a possible rejection does not derail you, your sleep is good, routines are stable, and you can name 2-3 changes that are in your control.

What if I break NC several times?

It happens. Start again, analyze your trigger (time, place, emotion), replace the cue (evening jog instead of scrolling), use a buddy and timers. After a third break, professional help often makes the difference.

Can NC be manipulative?

Yes, if used as punishment or as a tactic. Used correctly, it is a self-care boundary with honest communication, not a game.

How do I end NC respectfully?

Short message: appreciation, note on your own work, low-pressure invitation for light contact. No pressure, no blame.

What if I realize after NC that I do not want to get back together?

Use the clarity for a clean closure. You can say so or leave it quietly if no contact is needed. Focus on the future.

Can I return or pick up gifts during NC?

Only in planned 15-minute slots, neutral location, bring someone if helpful. No small talk, no "How are you?", no memory lane.

Bottom line: hope with grounding

No Contact after a 1-year relationship is not a trick. It is a reset for your nervous system, your self, and, if you both want it, your communication. Thirty to sixty days is a robust range, long enough to ease physiology and psychology, short enough to keep a bridge. You will not convince anyone by waiting, but by inner stability, clarity, and respectful behavior. Whether you reconnect or part peacefully, this time can be one of the best investments in your emotional future.

What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?

Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic reconciliation with your ex-partner is - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.

Scientific Sources

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E. E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275.

Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213–232.

Sbarra, D. A. (2008). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Rumination, depressive symptoms, and social contact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(3), 309–322.

Field, T. (2011). Romantic breakup distress in university students. College Student Journal, 45(3), 461–466.

Slotter, E. B., Gardner, W. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). Who am I without you? The influence of romantic breakup on the self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 147–160.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection. Brunner-Routledge.

Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392–402.

Marshall, T. C. (2012). Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: Associations with postbreakup recovery and personal growth. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 521–526.

Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2016). Neurobiology of addiction: A neurocircuitry analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), 760–773.

Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Ruminative coping and the development of depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(2), 211–221.

Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299.

Harvey, J. H., & Fine, M. A. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Pennebaker, J. W., & Chung, C. K. (2011). Expressive writing: Connections to physical and mental health. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology (pp. 417–437). Oxford University Press.

Eddy, B. (2014). BIFF: Quick Responses to High-Conflict People, Their Personal Attacks, Hostile Email and Social Media Meltdowns. HCI Press.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton.

Keng, S.-L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1041–1056.