Minimum No Contact: The Absolute Baseline

What is the minimum No Contact that still works? Learn the evidence-based baseline, how your brain and attachment react, and how to implement No Contact in real life.

18 min. read No Contact

Why you should read this article

You want the clear answer: how long does No Contact need to last at minimum for it to work at all? That is exactly what this is about. You will not get a gut feel, you will get an evidence-based guideline: how your brain, your attachment dynamics, and your emotions react to contact deprivation after a breakup, and why a No Contact minimum that is too short often makes everything worse. With studies from attachment research (Bowlby, Ainsworth; Hazan & Shaver), the neurochemistry of love (Fisher; Acevedo; Young), breakup psychology (Sbarra; Field) and relationship research (Gottman; Johnson; Hendrick), we show you what the absolute minimum is for you, and how to stick to it in real life, even with kids, a shared apartment, or overlapping friend groups.

What does "minimum No Contact" even mean?

No Contact is a limited period of consistent silence: no texts, no calls, no meetups, no social media checking, unless unavoidable logistics require a short, neutral message (for example, kids handoffs, apartment lease or billing issues). The minimum No Contact means the smallest sensible window in which this distance can deliver its core effects at all: calm acute withdrawal, reduce rumination, strengthen self-control, gain perspective, and interrupt the emotional escalation loop.

Important: a "minimum NC" is not a magic timeframe that guarantees your ex comes back. It is a therapeutic recovery window for you, supported by evidence from neuroscience and attachment theory. Only once you have stabilized does gradual, strategic contact make sense at all, if your goal is a fresh start.

The neurochemistry of love is comparable to a drug addiction.

Dr. Helen Fisher , Anthropologist, Kinsey Institute

Why a minimum at all? The science in brief

  • Neurochemistry: Being in love and love loss activate reward and pain networks (Aron et al., 2005; Fisher et al., 2010; Kross et al., 2011). Every message from your ex is a cue that triggers the system, similar to withdrawal.
  • Attachment system: Breakups activate the attachment system. Depending on style (anxious, avoidant, secure) you react with protest and clinging, withdrawal, or mixed signals (Bowlby, 1969; Hazan & Shaver, 1987; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007).
  • Breakup course: Distress declines on average over weeks, not days. Contact with an ex can prolong rumination and inner stress (Sbarra & Emery, 5; Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008).
  • Digital triggers: Constant social media checking keeps the attachment system activated (Marshall et al., 2013). No Contact also needs No Checking.

The takeaway: your nervous system needs a minimum window to switch from alarm to stabilization. Reconnecting too soon often means a relapse into old patterns.

The absolute minimum: an evidence-informed guideline

After comparing neurobiological adaptation windows, emotion regulation and breakup trajectories, here is the evidence-informed minimum:

  • Standard case: 30 days of consistent No Contact (no chat, no calls, no social media checking, block if needed). For most people, this minimum duration is the most effective lower bound.
  • Mild attachment activation, short relationship (< 6 months) and low entanglement (no kids, no shared home): 21-30 days minimum NC. Under 21 days the relapse risk is very high.
  • High entanglement (kids, shared apartment, same workplace, strong ambivalent on-off dynamics): 45 days minimum NC in a "modified" form (logistics-only messages, no emotional content). Realistically 45-60 days when emotions run hot.
  • Traumatic breakup (infidelity, massive fights, devaluation): at least 45 days, ideally 60 days. Emotional homeostasis needs more time.
  • If the thought of contact sets off bodily alarm (racing heart, tingling, insomnia): aim for 45 days, regardless of other factors.

Why are 30 days the core minimum? Studies show acute heartbreak peaks in the first weeks (Sbarra & Emery, 2005). Reward and pain sensitivity starts to flatten with fewer triggers after several weeks (Fisher et al., 2010; Aron et al., 2005). Rumination decreases with distance and alternative regulation strategies (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008). Thirty days is not a dogma, but a solid lower limit for most situations.

Note: minimum does not mean optimal. Many people need longer. If your nervous system is still highly activated after 30 days, extend instead of forcing contact.

The 5 core goals of the minimum No Contact, and how to measure them

  • Cue reduction: Reduce ex-related cues (messages, photos, places). Metric: under 2 involuntary checks per day after 2 weeks.
  • Emotion regulation: Noticeably fewer waves of panic and longing. Metric: craving score drops from 8-10 out of 10 to 4-5 out of 10 after 3-4 weeks.
  • Cognitive clarity: Rumination gives way to purposeful reflection. Metric: under 15 minutes per day of rumination loops (stopped deliberately).
  • Behavioral control: Impulse and action are decoupled. Metric: zero unplanned ex contacts per week.
  • Values and boundaries: Conscious relationship criteria. Metric: 3 values plus 5 red flags written down.

What is happening inside you? Brain and attachment in withdrawal

  • Reward system: Longing for your ex is dopaminergic, similar to craving in addiction (Aron et al., 2005; Fisher et al., 2010). Every contact gives a micro hit and maintains dependence.
  • Pain overlap: Social rejection activates pain centers (Kross et al., 2011). That is why a simple "Hi" from your ex feels like relief, until the next crash hits.
  • Attachment alarm: Anxious style leans toward protest behaviors (clinging, message bursts). Avoidant style leans toward withdrawal and rationalizing. Secure style regulates more evenly (Hazan & Shaver, 1987; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007).
  • Pair-bond chemistry: Oxytocin and vasopressin stabilize bonds, but after a breakup they can amplify longing (Young & Wang, 2004). Distance helps these systems downshift.

No Contact is primarily a neuro-psychological reset, not a mind game. Without a long enough pause your system stays on alert, and you react impulsively instead of strategically.

The 4-phase roadmap for the minimum No Contact

Phase 1

Acute withdrawal (Days 1-10)

  • Symptoms: craving, sleep issues, urge to text, social media checking.
  • Tasks: temporarily block numbers, mute social feeds, write a trigger list, create a craving emergency plan.
  • Tools: 3-3-3 breathing, a short power walk, journaling, call a trusted buddy.
Phase 2

Stabilization (Days 11-21)

  • Symptoms: first relief, relapses possible.
  • Tasks: daily structure, exercise routine, sleep hygiene, social detox, start 2-3 new micro hobbies.
  • Tools: if-then plans ("If I want to check their feed, then 10 push-ups and close the app").
Phase 3

Re-integration (Days 22-30)

  • Symptoms: more clarity, triggers remain.
  • Tasks: values clarification (3 relationship values), red-flag list, prep communication scripts for later contact.
  • Tools: attachment style check, define boundaries, first mini self-efficacy experiment.
Phase 4

Optional extension (Days 31-45+)

  • Indication: strong triggers, co-parenting, on-off pattern.
  • Tasks: deeper schema coaching, clear co-parenting protocols, strengthen new social ties.
  • Tools: weekly review, progress metrics, decision: extend or test a cautious contact.

The barrier stack: four layers that support you

  • Digital: block or mute, app limits, focus mode, email filters.
  • Social: buddy system, evening plans, accountability check-ins.
  • Spatial: new routes, different grocery stores or cafes, put reminders out of sight.
  • Cognitive: if-then plans, self-compassion statements, reframing ("I pause to choose, not to wait").

The minimum explained in three scenarios

  • Sarah, 34, two kids, breakup after 7 years: intense emotions at every handoff. Solution: 45 days of modified No Contact (logistics-only messages). Format: "Pickup Friday 6:00 PM as agreed."
  • Jake, 29, anxious attachment, 1.5-year relationship: panic and urge to explain himself. Solution: 30 days full NC, strong behavior scaffolding (blocking, app restrictions, daily workout). After 30 days, check in only if stable.
  • Layla, 41, avoidant ex, on-off relationship: sporadic replies that still trigger. Solution: 45 days full NC to break the pursuer-distancer loop. After that, only structured, brief first contact.

How to put minimum NC into practice

  • Blocking is not dramatic, it is a crutch: if every ping triggers you, temporarily block numbers and socials.
  • Social media rule: unfollow or mute. No checking mutual friends' stories.
  • Trigger cards: note typical triggers (evenings alone, shared places, music) and one concrete counter move.
  • If-then plans: "If I start typing, I put the phone in another room and walk for 5 minutes."
  • Regulate your body too: daily movement for 20-30 minutes lowers stress and craving.
  • Sleep before everything else: regular bedtimes and no screens for 60 minutes beforehand.
  • Social substitution: two reliable people as emergency contacts, fixed check-in times.

Do: implement the minimum NC the right way

  • 21-30 days as an absolute lower bound. With high activation, 45 days.
  • Logistics-only communication if unavoidable.
  • Social media detox: mute, unfollow.
  • Clear daily structure, movement, sleep hygiene.
  • If-then plans and trigger lists.

Don't: common mistakes

  • "Just checking in" (hidden closeness).
  • "Let’s be friends" as a pretext for constant contact.
  • Online stalking, checking stories, rereading chats.
  • Alcohol or late-night texting.
  • Quitting after 7-10 days because it "feels better".

How attachment style changes your minimum

  • Anxious: high protest, FOMO, strong rumination. Recommendation: 30-45 days, strict blocking, daily social support, clear self-soothing techniques.
  • Avoidant: rationalizes, but still triggered by contact. Recommendation: 30 days minimum, watch avoidant defenses (pseudo indifference), focus on values and honest emotional work.
  • Disorganized or mixed: swings between closeness and withdrawal. Recommendation: 45+ days, consider professional support.
  • Secure: better self-regulation, still hurts. Recommendation: 21-30 days can suffice, focus on meaning rather than control impulses.

Minimum No Contact with family and work in the mix

If kids, work, or contracts force some contact, use a "modified No Contact":

  • Only brief, neutral logistics, no small talk, no emojis, no nostalgia.
  • Clear subject lines or info formats: "Subject: Friday 6:00 PM pickup - Yes/No".
  • Reduce channels (email or a co-parenting app only). No voice notes.
  • No in-person meetings unless necessary. Use third parties or neutral locations for handoffs.

Sample wording:

  • Wrong: "Hey, how are you? The kids miss you so much."
  • Right: "Pickup Friday 6:00 PM as agreed. Please confirm."

Important: modified No Contact is not "softer". It is just as strict, only limited to essential logistics.

Social media: the underrated minimum

  • Muting or unfollowing reduces triggers. "Just a quick look" reactivates the reward loop.
  • No indirect contact attempts (posts designed to be seen by your ex).
  • No comments with mutual friends. No passive-aggressive storytelling.

Rule: anything intended to elicit a reaction from your ex is contact, even if it is "just" a post.

The NC compass: decision tree for your minimum

  1. Are there kids, lease or job ties, or safety issues? Yes -> modified, 45 days. No -> next.
  2. Relationship under 6 months, low entanglement? Yes -> 21-30 days. No -> 30-45 days.
  3. Anxious style or on-off? Yes -> 45 days. No -> 30 days.
  4. Bodily alarm when you imagine contact? Yes -> 45 days. No -> 30 days.
  5. After 30 days: 6-criteria check met? Yes -> cautious first contact. No -> add 15 days.

How to test the end of your minimum: 6-criteria check

End minimum NC only when you largely meet these criteria:

  1. Emotional stability: you can imagine contact without a bodily alarm.
  2. Rumination is clearly reduced: you no longer obsess.
  3. Self-control: you can say no if they want to meet immediately.
  4. Values clarity: you know what you want and do not want in a relationship.
  5. Script ready: you have 2-3 neutral, short first-contact options.
  6. No rescue fantasy: you are not searching for a magic sentence that fixes everything.

If two or more points are not met yet, extend. It is not a race.

Numbers to help you stay realistic

30 days

A solid lower bound for most cases, below that relapse risk is high.

3-4 weeks

Typical time until acute symptoms noticeably ease, varies by person.

+15 days

With high entanglement or on-off, adding 15 more days often helps a lot.

Note: these are practical benchmarks, not rigid laws. The literature supports the logic (withdrawal and attachment regulation), not an exact day count.

Case examples: decisions at the minimum

  • Tom, 26: after 10 days his ex texts "How are you?" Tom feels his heart race. Decision: do not reply, 20 more days of NC, do a workout and journal instead. Result: after 30 days Tom is calmer and sends a neutral note without clinging.
  • Mia, 32: co-parenting, ex texts at night about old issues. Solution: communication window 8 AM to 6 PM, ignore everything else. For violations, standard reply: "Please keep logistics to 8 AM to 6 PM via the app."
  • Alex, 38: avoidant ex, on-off. Minimum: 45 days full NC. After 45 days, first contact in two sentences, no meetup until week 9, after boundaries are clear.

Common myths about minimum NC

  • "If I do 14 days then text, that shows strength." Not really. It shows you could not calm your system yet.
  • "Blocking is immature." Blocking is self-protection. Maturity means knowing and keeping your boundaries.
  • "No Contact is manipulative." Not when the goal is self-regulation and clear conditions for respectful contact.

Mini program for 30 days of minimum NC

  • Morning: 10 minutes of movement, 5 minutes of breathing, 5 minutes of values journaling.
  • Midday: 10 minutes of daylight, 5 minutes of gratitude.
  • Evening: 15 minutes of learning or a hobby, 30 minutes screen free before bed.
  • Digital: app limits (15 minutes per day for socials), mute or block the ex.
  • Weekly: one friend meetup, one new activity, weekly review (what worked?).

When to extend

  • You still secretly check socials.
  • The thought of contact makes you panic.
  • You keep searching for "hidden messages".
  • You work together or have kids, logistics conflicts heat up.

In these cases, 45-60 days are more realistic, a gift to your future self-control.

First contact after the minimum: if at all, do it like this

If you meet all criteria and choose to reach out, start minimally:

  • Example 1 (neutral): "Hey, hope you are well. If you are open to it, we could grab a coffee next week and talk briefly."
  • Example 2 (logistics-only): "If a quick exchange makes sense, Wednesday evening works for me."
  • Example 3 (co-parenting): "Logistics are set. Everything else another time."

What to avoid:

  • Blame, long explanations, tests, jealousy plays.
  • "I have changed so much" essays. Show stability through behavior, not words.

Why shorter almost never works

  • Neuro: under 21 days the reward system stays highly sensitive. Every micro-contact is a cue.
  • Psychology: rumination and obsession do not sustainably decrease in 1-2 weeks.
  • Behavior: new routines are not established yet. Old patterns take over fast.

Therefore, minimum No Contact does not mean "barely enough to count", it means "just enough to give your system a real chance".

Emotional first aid for the first 14 days

  • Crisis card: "I call X, go outside for 5 minutes, drink water, do 30 squats."
  • 3-3-3 breathing: inhale 3 seconds, hold 3, exhale 3, for 3 minutes.
  • Cold splash: cold water on your face for 20-30 seconds.
  • Radical acceptance: "It is okay that it hurts. Pain is a wave, not my identity."

Values and boundaries, what the pause is really for

  • Define your 3 relationship values.
  • Note 5 red flags from the past.
  • Write 3 boundaries (for example, "No yelling in conflict", "Transparency about messages with ex-partners once exclusive").

This clarity makes later contact meaningful or protects you from a repeat.

The minimum NC in on-off relationships

On-off patterns are often attachment dynamics: anxious chases avoidant, avoidant signals independence, anxious protests. The minimum NC needs to be longer here (45+ days) to break the pursuer-distancer cycle. Only then start a controlled, very slow contact build.

Handling trigger moments in daily life

  • Places: change routes, new cafes, new running path.
  • Times: build evening rituals (reading, bath, call with a friend).
  • Objects: move the memory box out of sight.
  • Music: curated playlist without your shared songs in phases 1-2.

What if the ex texts during the minimum?

  • Check: is it necessary logistics? Yes -> reply briefly and neutrally. No -> ignore.
  • If you want to reply but should not: write it in a notes app. Do not send.
  • If boundaries are crossed: set a short boundary, "Please respect that I need distance right now. I will reach out when I am ready."

Measurable progress during the minimum

  • Sleep: from 5-6 to 7-8 hours.
  • Social checking: from 20 times per day to under 2 per day.
  • Craving intensity: from 9 out of 10 to 3-4 out of 10.
  • Training metaphor: progress means fewer and less intense relapses.

Safety and exceptions: when you must do it differently

  • Acute violence or stalking: safety is the priority. Document incidents, consider protective steps, contact trusted people or hotlines. No Contact can be part of a safety plan (block channels, do not react), but do nothing that puts you at risk.
  • Joint therapy or mediation: if professionally guided, a shortened modified pause between sessions can be reasonable, always with clear rules and protocols.
  • Acute crises (serious illness or a death in the immediate circle): allow a brief, purely compassionate, non-attachment message, then return to NC.

Special cases: how to adapt your minimum

  • Tight-knit or LGBTQIA+ community: set neutral zones, ask mutuals not to pass along updates, choose alternate event days.
  • Shared apartment or roommates: set handoff times, move messaging to email, temporarily split kitchen or living zones.
  • Workplace: use work channels only, work topics only, consider CC'ing a third person, no private meetups at work.
  • Shared pets: fixed exchange plans, use a third party or pet sitter for handoffs, no ad hoc chats.
  • College or club: change seats or sections, inform a TA or coach, plan breaks.
  • Holidays or birthdays: plan in advance (who is with you, what you do at a set time), prepare an auto-reply: "Thanks for the message, I am offline right now."

Scripts and templates: 15 sentences for tricky moments

  • Boundary: "I need distance to get steady. I will reach out when I am ready."
  • Logistics-only: "Please confirm Friday 6:00 PM."
  • Delay: "I will reply tomorrow between 8 AM and 6 PM."
  • Decline meetup: "Thanks for the invite. Now is not a good time for me."
  • Co-parenting update: "Got it. Decision by Wednesday."
  • Boundary breach: "No messages after 6 PM. Please respect this."
  • Rumors or indirects: "I do not take part in indirect messaging."
  • Social media reaction: do not respond, note it privately, continue NC.
  • Birthday thanks during NC: "Thanks."
  • Email auto-responder: "I am only responding to logistics right now."
  • To friends: "Please no updates about X."
  • Neutral handoff: "On time, 6:00 PM, front door."
  • After a slip: "I take responsibility. I need distance again."
  • Clarify a misunderstanding (brief): "Here is one fact, the rest later."
  • Work: "For this topic please open a ticket or use the Slack channel."

Tool stack: tech that protects you

  • App limits or focus mode: iOS or Android Screen Time, app blockers.
  • Filters: email rules to a "Later" folder, turn off push notifications.
  • Emergency locks: temporary block apps that only a buddy can unlock.
  • Journal prompts: 3 daily questions, what did I feel, what helped, what did I learn?
  • Progress tracker: craving 0-10, sleep hours, social checks per day.

Contact after the minimum: a clean protocol

  • Week 1 after NC: one short, neutral ping (two sentences). Do not propose a meetup yet.
  • Wait for the reaction: if nothing or evasive -> 7-14 more days of quiet. If neutral or open -> step 2.
  • Step 2: 2-3 brief exchanges, then suggest a short meetup in a neutral spot (30-45 minutes, daytime).
  • At the meetup: no relationship autopsy. Keep it light, present, appreciative, do not rehash the past.
  • After the meetup: 24 hours of silence. Then a brief, clear follow-up.
  • 2-2-2 rule (optional): 2 messages, wait 2 days, then the second message, then consider a meetup. Keep the pace slow.

Alternative path: closure instead of reconnection

  • Farewell ritual: a letter to yourself (do not send), seal the memory box, a symbolic act (for example, a walk at a new place).
  • New bonds: gradually build routines, hobbies, friendships.
  • Perspective shift: "I am not only losing something, I am gaining agency and calm."

Cognitive traps and how to stop them

  • Mind reading: "They probably want..." -> fact check: "What do I know for sure?"
  • Catastrophizing: "Alone forever" -> collect counter evidence.
  • Rosy retrospection: only remembering highlights -> full picture, include the costs.
  • Personalizing: making everything about you -> include systems and patterns (attachment dynamics).

Self-compassion in 3 steps (60 seconds)

  • Mindfulness: "This hurts."
  • Common humanity: "Others go through this too."
  • Kindness: "What would I tell a good friend right now?" Then say exactly that to yourself.

Co-parenting: micro agreements that avoid drama

  • Channels: app or email only. No private messengers.
  • Time window: 8 AM to 6 PM. No night communication.
  • Format: bullet points, yes or no questions, clear deadlines.
  • Escalation: if conflict spikes, pause 24 hours, then offer two options.

Workplace: boundaries that hold

  • Written only, neutral, CC team or HR when appropriate.
  • Meetings: with a third person, clear agenda, time limit.
  • No private hallway chats. Standard reply: "Let’s keep this professional."

FAQ: minimum No Contact, the most common questions

Usually not. Neuro and attachment triggers are still highly active at day 14. A solid lower bound is 21-30 days, with 30 days as the standard.

Yes, as modified No Contact: logistics-only, clear windows and channels, no emotional content. The goal is still minimal cues, maximum stability.

Usually no. The pursuer-distancer pattern needs a longer pause (about 45 days) so both nervous systems settle and real choice becomes possible.

No. Blocking is a temporary self-protection measure to prevent relapses, like taking candy out of the kitchen when you go sugar free.

If you are still in the minimum, either do not reply or respond neutral and brief ("Thanks"). Do not start a conversation, you would risk your stabilization.

No Contact stops the cue loop, not genuine bond. If there is substance, it will survive a mature pause, and it will benefit from it.

No drama, learn from it. What triggered you? Adjust your plan (more barriers, more support). Extend your minimum by 7-10 days.

Only if it is not an avoidance strategy. Rebounds often numb and delay processing. In the first 30 days, focus on yourself.

If you get stuck in the same mental loops and it affects your mood, sleep, or daily life, that is rumination. Aim for lower frequency and intensity.

In phases 1-2, hide or archive, do not keep looking. Deleting is fine if it gives you safety. It is not betrayal, it is self-protection.

Thank them and decline kindly: "Thanks, I need some quiet first. I will reach out myself when I am ready." Ask them not to send updates or stories.

If it triggers you, pause or mute temporarily. Inform the group briefly, no details.

Breakup pain often brings waves of guilt or shame. Use self-compassion, check facts, and apologize later if needed, not in the middle of withdrawal.

Boundary clearly: "I need distance and will not respond for now." No further discussion. If they persist, block channels, seek help for boundary violations.

Science corner: why distance works

  • Rumination decreases when attention is occupied (routine, exercise, social tasks). That frees cognitive resources, a self-reinforcing effect.
  • Reward systems need low-cue periods to dampen sensitivity. Every unpredictable contact is a variable reward, the strongest conditioner. Consistency of abstinence matters more than heroic single days.

Why the minimum matters even if you want a fresh start

If you want a true restart, you need more than longing: a regulated nervous system, stable boundaries, and a clear vision. Without minimum NC you enter contact with pressure and recreate old conflicts. The minimum is the price of admission for adult communication.

A word on hope and reality

Hope is valuable. It loses power when tied to compulsion. No Contact gives hope room to mature, either toward a grounded reunion or toward a new chapter without constant alarm. Either way, you win.

Mini checklist: ready to start the minimum?

  • I understand NC is not a game, it is self-protection.
  • I have apps and numbers ready to block or mute.
  • I have two emergency contacts and set check-in times.
  • I have if-then plans for typical triggers.
  • I have decided: 30 days minimum, 45 if activation is high.

Mini checklist: ready to end the minimum?

  • I can imagine contact without an alarm response.
  • I do not need my ex to validate me to feel okay.
  • I have neutral first-contact scripts.
  • I know the conditions under which I would continue No Contact.

Final thought: the minimum as an invitation to your life

Minimum No Contact is not a punishment, it is an invitation to clarity, calm, and choice. You stop the spiral of impulse, contact, crash. Whether it leads to a new chance together or a good letting go, 30 or 45 days are the best investment in your self-respect. You are making time with yourself again, and that is what makes you a better partner later, with your ex or with someone new.

What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?

Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic reconciliation with your ex-partner is - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.

Scientific Sources

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, E. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Erlbaum.

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.

Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(1), 327–337.

Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51–60.

Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2011). Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 145–159.

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding: Insights from prairie voles. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.

Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E. E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275.

Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213–232.

Field, T., Diego, M., Pelaez, M., Deeds, O., & Delgado, J. (2009). Breakup distress and loss of intimacy, contact, and sexual intimacy. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 14(2), 92–100.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400–424.

Marshall, T. C., Bejanyan, K., Di Castro, G., & Lee, R. A. (2013). Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 20(1), 1–22.

Tashiro, T., & Frazier, P. (2003). "I'll never be in a relationship like that again": Personal growth following romantic relationship breakups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20(5), 801–823.

Sbarra, D. A., Briskin, J. L., & Slatcher, R. B. (2019). Smartphones and close relationships: The case for an evolutionary mismatch. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 596–618.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221–233.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection. Brunner-Routledge.

Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98.

Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Adult attachment and the suppression of unwanted thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 219–232.