ADHD and Relationships: Strengths, Triggers, Tools
Understand ADHD in relationships and use science backed tools to cut conflict, build trust, and deepen intimacy. Clear, practical strategies for couples.
24 min. read
Special Situations
Why you should read this
You love someone with ADHD, or you have ADHD yourself, and you notice that your relationship runs hotter, messier, or more tender than others. Maybe you already broke up and want to understand what happened, and whether a respectful reset is possible. This article shows what is going on psychologically and neurologically in ADHD relationships, why typical patterns emerge (from impulsivity and forgetfulness to rejection sensitivity), and how to use practical strategies to build more calm, closeness, and reliability. Every recommendation is based on research on adult ADHD, emotion regulation, attachment, and couple dynamics.
What does ADHD mean in a relationship?
ADHD (Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) is a neurodevelopmental difference. It affects not only attention and impulsivity, it also influences executive functions (planning, working memory, emotion regulation). In relationships, this often shows up as:
big emotional swings and high intensity during conflict
difficulty with punctuality, organization, and keeping agreements
hyperfocus on a partner or projects, then sudden pulling away
fast talking, interrupting, quick topic shifts
forgetting everyday things, despite real care
heightened sensitivity to rejection and criticism
Important: ADHD is not a character flaw, it affects the brain’s control center. At the same time, ADHD is not a free pass. With responsibility, tools, and mutual adjustments, ADHD relationships can be not only possible, they are often creative, lively, and deep.
2-5%
Prevalence of ADHD in adults (varies by study)
5:1
Gottman's positive to negative ratio for stable relationships
15 min
Length of a good weekly couple check-in
The science: What happens in ADHD psychologically and neurologically?
ADHD involves networks for attention, motivation, and impulse control. Studies describe differences in fronto-striatal and fronto-parietal networks that govern executive functions (Castellanos & Proal, 2012; Shaw et al., 2007). Dopamine and norepinephrine systems, which help regulate reward, motivation, and focused attention, play a central role. That explains why immediately rewarding stimuli (for example exciting chats, new ideas, digital distractions) pull strongly, while long-term, lower-stimulus tasks (household, taxes, scheduling) feel hard, even though they matter.
Emotional aspects: Beyond inattention and impulsivity, emotion regulation is key. Many adults with ADHD report more intense feelings, quicker irritability, and difficulty calming down after conflict (Shaw, Stringaris, Nigg & Leibenluft, 2014). This is not being “too sensitive”, it reflects neurobiological processing of stimuli.
Attachment and ADHD: Attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969; Hazan & Shaver, 1987) helps explain how early relationships shape internal working models. ADHD can amplify attachment insecurity if frequent criticism and failure experiences damage self-image. The flip side: a secure bond (reliable, warm, responsive) has a powerful regulating effect.
Breakups and neurochemical pain: During distancing or breakup, studies show activation in brain regions linked to physical pain and reward deprivation (Fisher et al., 2010). People with ADHD, often sensitive to rejection, can feel breakup pain especially intensely. Sbarra (2006) notes that repeated emotional contact slows healing after breakups, ADHD or not.
Couple research: John Gottman (1994; 1999) describes four escalation patterns (the “Four Horsemen”: criticism, defensiveness, contempt, stonewalling) and emphasizes a 5:1 ratio of positive to negative interactions for stability. Emotionally Focused Therapy (Johnson, 2004) centers attachment needs: anger often masks protest over lost connection.
The neurochemistry of love is comparable to a drug addiction: reward systems are heavily recruited, also during loss.
ADHD relationship strengths and challenges at a glance
Strengths
Spontaneity, humor, creativity
Deep enthusiasm and loyalty
Intense experience of closeness and romance
Hyperfocus can supercharge attention and care at times
Challenges
Time blindness, procrastination, everyday chaos
Impulsive communication, interrupting, talking too fast
Emotional waves that escalate conflict
Forgetfulness can feel like “it is not important to you”, even when it is
How typical patterns form, and how to spot them
The misinterpretation cycle: You forget your anniversary. Your partner reads it as indifference. You feel shame and defend impulsively, it lands as cold or dismissive. The fight is not about the date, it is about the feeling of not being seen.
The dopamine dilemma: You start projects with fire, then stop. Your partner feels sidelined. The message that lands: “I am not a priority.”
The escalation loop: Criticism (“You are always unreliable”), defensiveness (“That is not who I am”), contempt (eye roll), withdrawal (slamming doors). Gottman calls this a reliable path to distance.
Important: If anger over “socks on the floor” explodes, it is rarely about socks. It is about reliability, safety, and feeling seen.
The ADHD foundation in love: executive functions
Executive functions are like the project management of the brain. In relationships this means:
Working memory: “What were we just discussing?” Content drops faster. Solution: take notes during talks (keywords, not sentences), visible to-do list.
Inhibition: Not interrupting is harder. Solution: a visual speaking token, a notepad for in-between thoughts.
Cognitive flexibility: Topic switching is easy, sticking with one is hard. Solution: an agenda per conversation and a timer for each point.
Planning/prioritizing: Good intentions stall at execution. Solution: micro-steps, fixed time windows, immediate reward after the step.
Specialty: time blindness. Many people do not “feel” time reliably. This affects punctuality, and also the felt wait time for a partner or how large a miss “feels”. External timekeepers (timers, calendars with reminders, clocks in sight) are bond-relevant, not just organizational hacks.
Practical application: a relationship operating system for ADHD
Goal: resilient structures that externally support executive functions. You replace willpower (unreliable) with systems (reliable).
Visibility and external memory
Shared calendar with reminders, central weekly plan on the fridge
Task board (3 columns: Today - This Week - Later) with max 3 top priorities per day
Color codes for responsibilities
If it is visible, it is doable: do not hide action items in drawers
Micro-commitments and the “start easy” principle
Agreements in 15-25 minute units
If-then pairing: “If I unload the dishwasher, I listen to my favorite podcast.”
Body doubling: work quietly together, presence reduces procrastination
Communication formulas
X-Y-Z sentence: “When X happens, I feel Y, because Z. My request is …”
Reflect and validate: “What I heard is …, it makes sense that you feel that way.”
Meeting, not fight: move hot topics to the weekly check-in
Emotion regulation on the fly
20 minute pause if pulse is high or arousal spikes, set a timer and take space
Calm kit: breathing (4-7-8), cold water, a short walk
After the pause, return and structure the topic (max 20 minutes per topic)
Rewards and dopamine design
Gamify: collect points for recurring tasks, define rewards
Immediate mini-rewards (coffee, 5 minutes of sunshine) after mini-steps
Temptation bundling: favorite show only during boring routines
Responsibility and fairness
Clear split of duties: 3-5 core areas per person, written and visible
Failure recovery protocol: when something goes wrong, skip blame and go to solution (“What was the obstacle? How do we prevent a repeat? What reminder or tool is missing?”)
Friction design and environment
Remove unnecessary stimuli: phone garage by the door, bins for cables/adapters, one drop zone at the entrance
Increase friction for unhelpful habits: sweets on the top shelf, distracting apps on the second screen
Decrease friction for helpful habits: cleaning supplies in each room, letter opener and recycling bin by the door
Concrete scenarios: what this looks like day to day
Sarah (34) and Jake (36): Sarah has ADHD and often hyperfocuses on new ideas. Jake feels secondary. Solution: a “project parking lot” list with a weekly pick of at most one new project. Jake helps choose. Sarah feels in control, Jake feels included.
Mia (29) and Leah (31): Mia forgets plans, which Leah reads as disregard. They set up a calendar with double reminders (night before and 2 hours before). Leah gets an automated notification. Result: fewer arguments, more safety.
Tony (41) and Anna (39): Fights escalate fast. They add the 20 minute pause plus an “affect check” at the start of a topic (scale 1-10). If above 6: regulate first, then talk. Arguments halve in length.
Ben (27) and Kim (27): Both have ADHD. Ideas multiply, execution lags. Solution: “Sprint Sunday” with 90 minutes of focused work, 10 minutes planning, 10 minutes celebrating. After 8 weeks the apartment is organized.
Communication with ADHD: fast, honest, sometimes too direct
People with ADHD often talk fast, jump topics, interrupt. It is rarely disrespect, it is excess information in the mind. Interrupting still hurts. Try:
Visual speaking token (for example a “conference stone”): whoever holds it speaks
A “parking lot” note for thoughts to avoid interrupting
One idea per sentence for hot topics
Paraphrase: “If I understand you right, then …”
Example phrases:
“I notice I am speeding up. Can I finish my sentences, and can you summarize back?”
“I notice I am drifting. Let’s stick to today’s point.”
Common mistake: making big promises in high emotion (“From tomorrow on, always!”). Better: regulate first, then plan small and concrete.
Emotion regulation and rejection sensitivity
Many adults with ADHD experience rejection, criticism, or distance intensely. The clinical term “Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria” (RSD) circulates, though it is not an official diagnosis. What is well supported: emotion dysregulation is a key predictor of distress (Shaw et al., 2014). For your relationship this means:
Criticism lands harder than intended
A partner’s temporary distance is interpreted as love withdrawal
Impulsive counterattacks escalate fights
Tools:
Reality check in 3 questions: What was actually said? What evidence do I have? What is a generous alternative explanation?
Corrective micro-repair: within 5 minutes of a sharp comment, a small apology plus reframe (“That came out harsher than I wanted. What I meant was: reliability matters to me.”)
“Distance is not rejection” signal: agree on a neutral sign for “I need 10 minutes to regulate, I will come back.”
Household, money, appointments: make the invisible work visible
ADHD does not block love, it often blocks logistics. Invisible labor breeds resentment. Sit down and list recurring to-dos:
Household: trash, kitchen, groceries, laundry
Finances: rent, bills, insurance
Relationship care: plan dates, family contacts
Health: prescriptions, medical appointments
Then assign responsibilities in 3 categories:
Owner: full responsibility, standard defined, reminders set
Partner: supports with body doubling or checklist
Back-up: steps in if needed
Pro tip: define “Definition of Done”. Not “kitchen”, but “counters clear, dishwasher running, floor swept, drain clear”.
Sexuality and closeness
ADHD can heighten intimacy (spontaneity, adventure), and it can interfere (distractibility, forgetfulness, impulsivity). Common themes:
Distraction during sex: agree on eye contact or short phrases as focus anchors.
Irregular libido: schedule “intimacy windows” like dates, with no pressure for sex.
Forgotten affection in daily life: three daily micro-gestures (1. morning kiss, 2. 6-second hug, 3. evening gratitude) stabilize bonding.
Sensory needs: some want more input (music, light, scent), others less. Discuss green/yellow/red sensory preferences in the bedroom.
Aftercare: after intense moments, intentionally cuddle, hydrate, and share a quick note (“I loved when you …”). This soothes the nervous system and strengthens the bond.
When one, both, or neither has ADHD: dynamics
One partner ADHD, the other neurotypical: risk of parent-child dynamics. Antidote: clear areas of responsibility and mutual recognition of competence.
Both ADHD: dopamine fireworks plus chaos. Antidote: joint sprints, external structures, clear rituals.
Neither ADHD, but ADHD in the larger system (child, work team): load on the couple rises. Helpful: outside support and time-boxed couple time.
Medication can reduce core symptoms and ease daily dynamics (Faraone et al., 2015; Wilens & Spencer, 2010). Decisions belong with clinicians. Psychotherapy, especially CBT-based programs for adult ADHD, improves organization, prioritizing, and emotion management (Knouse & Safren, 2010; Ramsay & Rostain, 2015). For couples, EFT (Johnson, 2004) and behavioral approaches show benefits (Gottman, 1999; Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy). ADHD coaching can help implement systems.
Medical decisions are always made with licensed clinicians. This article offers guidance, it does not replace treatment.
The weekly couple check-in (15-30 minutes)
Start: 1 minute of gratitude, each names 1-2 things
Logistics: sync calendars, top 3 tasks per person
Relationship: 1 topic with the X-Y-Z formula and a speaking timer (3-5 minutes each)
Repair: what went wrong last week? identify the obstacle, add a reminder or tool
Closeness: plan a date or quality time (time, place, responsible person)
Examples:
“When you are running late (X), I feel stressed and unimportant (Y), because I rely on you (Z). Request: add a 15 minute buffer and text if delayed.”
“When you are on your phone at night, I feel distant. Request: 30 minutes phone free before sleep.”
De-escalating conflict, step by step
Step 1
Notice the stop signal
Heart racing, raised voice, fast speech means you need a pause. Name it out loud: “I am at 7/10.”
Step 2
20 minute cooldown
Leave the room and downshift (breathing, water, movement). No ruminating, no internal closing argument.
Step 3
Restart with structure
Come back, set a 20 minute timer, one idea per sentence, use the X-Y-Z formula.
Step 4
Repair and agreement
Brief apology, analyze the obstacle, add a new reminder or tool.
Advanced conflict tools
Meta-conversation: “For 10 minutes, we will not discuss the issue, only how we want to discuss it.” Goal: set rules, speaking time, pause signal.
Scale, do not polarize: “What would a 3/10 solution be that works for today?” Small compromises lower the bar.
Trigger mapping: each person names 3 phrases/behaviors that reliably escalate, and 3 that reliably soothe.
Dopamine-friendly project management for couples
“Just start” minute: start for 60 seconds and ride the momentum
“Ridiculously easy” rule: make the task so small it feels silly
Binding deadline: visible externally in the calendar, instant micro-reward after
Themed sprints: 2 weeks focused on one area (for example paperwork), then celebrate
Plan energy, not just time: important talks when both are at 6/10 energy or higher
Sleep, stress, body: underrated levers
Sleep: ADHD often co-occurs with sleep issues. Agree on a wind-down time (dim lights, devices off, warm shower). Shared sleep hygiene stabilizes mood and attention.
Movement: 10-20 minutes of brisk walking boosts executive functions short term. Add mini-walks before tough conversations.
Nutrition: consistency helps. Small protein-rich snacks to prevent blood sugar dips that can trigger irritability.
Close stress cycles: after stress, intentionally “close the loop” (stretch, laugh, short hug) before the next topic.
Common thinking traps, and better alternatives
All or nothing: “If I cannot plan perfectly, I will not do it.” Better: the 2 minute rule, any micro-step counts.
Personalizing: “You want to hurt me.” Better: “We have a systems problem, not a love problem, let’s fix the system.”
Future catastrophizing: “It will always be like this.” Better: collect evidence for change and mark small wins.
Mind reading: “You should just know that …” Better: say the wish explicitly.
ADHD and breakups: why switching off is hard
After a breakup, reward systems amplify longing (Fisher et al., 2010). Many people with ADHD report “object permanence” effects in relationships: out of sight, out of mind, or the opposite, obsessive loops. Sbarra (2006) shows repeated emotional contact slows healing. Strategies:
Stimulus control: mute on social media, put photos out of sight
Structured day plan with highly rewarding but healthy activities (exercise, social time, creative projects)
No or low contact, if possible, for at least 30 days
Emotional self care: prioritize sleep, food, movement
Writing ritual: 10 minutes a day to write feelings, then put it away
If you have a real chance to reconnect: wait until emotions are regulated. Then a brief, calm outreach with a clear intention (no blame, no pleading). Example: “In the past weeks I have built new systems (calendar, check-ins) and would like to talk for 30 minutes in two weeks if you are open.”
Restart after a breakup: 30-60-90 day plan
Days 0-30: no big decisions. Soothe the nervous system, stabilize routines, activate support.
Days 31-60: analyze patterns (what worked and what did not), test tools (check-in, pause signal), track progress.
Days 61-90: if both want to try, have a short structured talk with a concrete proposal (“8-week plan”), clear go/no-go criteria.
Parenting with ADHD in a couple
Morning and evening routines with visual checklists
“Family sprint” on Sundays: 30 minutes planning, 30 minutes tidy up together, 10 minutes celebrating
Homework: body doubling, timers, tiny tasks
Protect couple time (even a 20 minute walk counts)
School/daycare: one primary contact per parent, a communication notebook or app, fixed times to read and reply (not ad hoc)
Managing digital distractions
Phone garage: defined places and times with no smartphone use (meals, bedroom)
Lock distracting apps after 9 pm, use an allowlist rather than a blocklist
Shared media agreement: how long, when, for what, posted on the fridge
Batch notifications: 3 fixed slots per day, not constant interruptions
Trust, jealousy, and honesty
Forgetfulness quickly feels like lying, especially when promises are not kept. Prevention:
Make commitments only after checking your calendar and setting reminders
“Tentative commitment” signal (“I will check and confirm by 6 pm”)
Transparency when you slip: notify early (“I realize I will not make it on time, proposal: …”)
For jealousy:
Regular check-ins on safety (“How secure do you feel about us from 1-10?”)
Micro-signals of commitment (quick updates when plans change)
No phone searches. Replace control with agreements on availability and openness.
Neurodiversity combos: ADHD with autism, anxiety, depression
ADHD + autism: high need for structure and predictability alongside impulsivity. Solution: clear rituals, fewer last-minute plan changes, visual plans.
ADHD + anxiety: procrastination from fear of mistakes. Solution: tiny steps plus validation (“Errors are part of the plan”), safe experiments.
Note: involve professional diagnosis/treatment for comorbid conditions.
Work, career, and the relationship
ADHD can bring performance spikes and dips. Relevant for couples:
Transitions: after work, have a 15 minute buffer ritual (change clothes, shower, 5 minutes quiet) before couple topics
Working from home: focus blocks and visible boundaries (“Door closed = do not disturb”)
Evening status update: 2 questions, “What did I get done today?” and “What is blocking me?” No fixing, just visibility
Grow positivity: the 5:1 rule in action
Daily mini-scan: what went well, say one sentence or send one text
Recurring compliments: note 3 strengths of your partner and name them intentionally this week
Bids for connection (Gottman): notice and respond on purpose (eye contact, brief touch, small questions)
Micro-celebrations: 30 seconds high-five or hug after completing tasks
Case vignettes: before and after
Before: Laura criticized John’s mess daily, John shut down. After: they plan two 15 minute “chaos corridor” blocks with a timer. Criticism drops, visible order rises.
Before: Tom forgot bills, Maya panicked. After: monthly “Money Monday” with a fixed flow (bills, budgets, 10 minute celebration). Panic gives way to predictability.
Before: Jasmine escalated arguments, Luis avoided talks. After: emotion scale plus 20 minute pause plus X-Y-Z formula. Talks stay solution focused.
Before: Paige got lost on social media, Owen felt alone. After: phone garage plus 30 minutes of evening quality time. Closeness rises, screen time drops.
Tools that work well in ADHD relationships
Visual timers (Time Timer)
Shared task apps (for example to-do lists with assignment)
Background sound: focus playlists
Ritual cards: morning/evening/check-in
Post-its as visual reminders (short, bold, visible)
Hallway whiteboard: “Today/This Week/Later”
Limits: what ADHD does not explain
ADHD explains impulsivity, chaos, forgetfulness. It does not explain disrespect, deliberate cruelty, or abuse. Clear boundaries matter. If you feel unsafe or threatened, get support.
ADHD is not an excuse for hurtful behavior. Responsibility and repair are part of the deal.
Safety and crisis plan
Define and respect a clear pause signal
Emergency stop steps: leave the room, 20 minutes regulation, no messaging during that time
In strong escalation: involve a third party or a professional
In cases of violence or threats: get help immediately. Safety first.
An 8-week plan for stability and closeness
Week 1: make things visible, set up calendar, task board, and check-in time
Week 2: practice communication formulas, introduce the 20 minute pause
Week 3: define the split of duties and the Definition of Done
Week 4: dopamine design, rewards and temptation bundling
Week 5: start Money Monday, declutter digital spaces
Week 6: date ritual plus 3 daily micro-gestures
Week 7: themed sprint for household or paperwork
Week 8: review what works, sharpen tools, celebrate
Science meets everyday life: why these tools work
Executive functions need external supports (Shaw et al., 2007): visible plans, timers, checklists
Emotion regulation benefits from pauses and repair (Shaw et al., 2014; Gottman, 1999)
Attachment strengthens through consistent small safety signals (Bowlby, 1969; Johnson, 2004)
Dopamine systems respond to immediate rewards, hence gamification and mini-rewards
Common pitfalls, and how to avoid them
Starting too big: instead of “organize the apartment”, try “5 minutes on the silverware drawer”
“We talk when it blows up”: better to have fixed meetings
One partner doing everything: better to have clear responsibilities and a backup rule
Only tools, no emotions: you need both, systems and bonding signals
Only emotions, no tools: good intentions without systems fade, build structures
Mini workbook: three weeks, three changes
Week A: daily gratitude ping, one sentence by text
Week B: two 15 minute power-clean blocks daily, timer, music
Week C: Money Monday plus a 10 minute celebration
After 3 weeks: evaluate, keep what works, add one thing.
When old wounds get triggered: keep attachment in view
If you hear “I am unlovable” underneath criticism, you will self-protect. Strategy:
Name it (“This is my old not-enough trigger”)
Breathe and use the pause signal
Name the need (“I need a quick sign of good will right now”)
Partner sends a bonding signal (“You matter to me. Let’s figure this out together.”)
Living together with different standards
Define three levels: minimal-OK, good, excellent
Aim daily life at minimal-OK, do “good” once a week together
Allow a “chaos zone” (one corner or room) so perfection does not block everything
Fair division of labor
100 points of total load, distribute together
Make mental load visible (planning counts)
Re-negotiate quarterly
“Who holds the clock?” The partner without ADHD often takes time and deadline roles, the partner with ADHD handles execution with gamification, or the reverse based on strengths
Long-distance and ADHD
Fixed sync times with an agenda and max 30 minutes per call
Asynchronous closeness: voice notes with a 2 minute limit, shared photo or gratitude folder
“Visit sprints”: one organized block for chores (laundry, groceries) plus one block for fun
Culture and gender considerations
Women and gender diverse people with ADHD are often diagnosed later; inner restlessness, perfectionism, and masking can hide relationship stress. Validation and relief matter.
In cultures with high order ideals, shame about mess shows up faster. Antidote: normalize visible systems, avoid moralizing.
Involve your team and family network
An “ADHD ally” outside the relationship (coach, friend) can serve as a body double and accountability partner.
Make family rules visible, especially for visits or holidays (who plans what and what “minimal-OK” means).
How to start talks without escalation
Soft start (Gottman): “What matters to me is …”, instead of “You always …”
One concrete example, one request, one next step
Limit speaking time, ask for a summary
Examples:
“Punctuality helps me feel safe. Can you add a 15 minute buffer?”
“I would love 30 minutes phone free before bed.”
“I want us to review bills on Mondays together. 20 minutes is enough.”
When it already blew up: repair over being right
Responsibility: “I should have said that differently.”
Empathy: “I see that hurt you.”
Future: “Next time I will use our pause signal.”
Follow-up: “What reminder or tool would help us prevent this?”
Data check: what is well supported, what is not
Supported: executive function deficits and emotion dysregulation in ADHD (Shaw et al., 2007; 2014)
Shared vision: write three sentences on “Why are we together?” and keep it visible.
Top 3 values: for example honesty, humor, reliability. Define one behavior per value (for example “honesty = use the tentative commitment signal”).
Rituals of connection: morning (one kiss and one preview sentence), evening (6 second hug and one thank you), weekly (check-in and date), monthly (Money Monday and mini-celebration), quarterly (review and day trip).
Decision matrix: “fast” (budget under $X, low risk) vs “slow” (budget over $X, impacts daily life). Slow decisions always go through the check-in.
Low-friction home and organizing systems
Open shelves and clear bins instead of closed cabinets
Duplicate gear for hotspots (extra chargers, second pair of scissors, spare key)
Household: cleaning plans as photo lists, visual checklists on the fridge
Mini case: a restart that worked
After 3 months apart, Eva and Mark plan a trial restart. Conditions: Money Monday, weekly check-in, “tentative commitment” signal, 20 minute pause, phone garage after 9 pm. After 8 weeks: 6/8 check-ins done, 2 escalations with repair under 24 hours, 70% of top 3 tasks completed. Both report more safety, fewer accusations, and more ease. They extend the plan and celebrate small wins monthly.
Bottom line: hope is a strategy
ADHD does not break relationships. Invisibility, overload, and missing tools do. When you understand what is happening neurologically and psychologically, the monster in the closet gets smaller. With visible structures, fair division of labor, caring communication, and small consistent rituals, stability grows. Stability is not boring, it is the ground where spontaneity, creativity, and closeness can really thrive. If you are apart, this can be the foundation for a respectful restart. If you are together, it is your signal to make your relationship operating system ADHD friendly. Step by step, week by week. You do not need to be perfect, only consistently good enough.
What Are Your Chances of Getting Your Ex Back?
Find out in just 8-10 minutes how realistic reconciliation with your ex-partner is - based on relationship psychology and practical insights.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
Castellanos, F. X., & Proal, E. (2012). Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: Beyond the prefrontal-striatal model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(1), 17-26.
Faraone, S. V., Banaschewski, T., Coghill, D., Zheng, Y., Biederman, J., Bellgrove, M. A., ... & Wang, Y. (2015). The World Federation of ADHD international consensus statement: 208 evidence-based conclusions about the disorder. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 25(5), 1-24.
Fisher, H. E., Brown, L. L., Aron, A., Strong, G., & Mashek, D. (2010). Reward, addiction, and emotion regulation systems associated with rejection in love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 51-60.
Gottman, J. M. (1994). What Predicts Divorce? The Relationship Between Marital Processes and Marital Outcomes. Psychology Press.
Gottman, J. M. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Crown.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
Johnson, S. M. (2004). The Practice of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy: Creating Connection. Routledge.
Knouse, L. E., & Safren, S. A. (2010). Current status of cognitive behavioral therapy for adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 33(3), 497-509.
Ramsay, J. R., & Rostain, A. L. (2015). Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Adult ADHD: An Integrative Psychosocial and Medical Approach (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Shaw, P., Eckstrand, K., Sharp, W., Blumenthal, J., Lerch, J. P., Greenstein, D., ... & Rapoport, J. L. (2007). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical maturation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(49), 19649-19654.
Shaw, P., Stringaris, A., Nigg, J., & Leibenluft, E. (2014). Emotion dysregulation in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(3), 276-293.
Simon, V., Czobor, P., Bálint, S., Mészáros, Á., & Bitter, I. (2009). Prevalence and correlates of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194(3), 204-211.
Sbarra, D. A., & Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 213-232.
Sbarra, D. A. (2006). Predicting the onset of emotional recovery following nonmarital relationship dissolution: Feeling better or feeling less bad? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 298-312.
Wilens, T. E., & Spencer, T. J. (2010). Understanding attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from childhood to adulthood. Postgraduate Medicine, 122(5), 97-109.
Barkley, R. A., Murphy, K. R., & Fischer, M. (2010). ADHD in Adults: What the Science Says. Guilford Press.
Graziano, P. A., & Garcia, A. (2016). ADHD and children’s emotion dysregulation: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 46, 106-123.